Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T02:09:41.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digestion by sheep of silages prepared from mixtures of tropical grasses and legumes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. Tjandraatmadja ,
I. C. MacRae  and
B. W. Norton
M. Tjandraatmadja
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
I. C. MacRae
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
B. W. Norton
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Four silage diets were prepared from tropical grass and legume mixtures and fed to intestinally fistulated sheep to determine the sites and extent of digestion of the different silage components in the digestive tract. Pangola grass (Digitaria decumbens) was ensiled either alone or with the addition, 33% (w/w), of leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala cv. Cunningham), gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium) or cowpea (Vigna unguiculata cv. Caloona). All forages were grown at the University of Queensland farm in 1985. All silages were well preserved as indicated by low pH (< 4·1), ammonia N (< 9% total N), acetic acid (< 13 g/kg dry matter (DM)) and ethanol (< 19 g/kg DM) contents, and high DM (> 290 g/kg) and lactic acid (> 41 g/kg DM) contents. The inclusion of leucaena and gliricidia significantly increased the total N content of the silages. The addition of legumes at ensiling significantly increased rumen ammonia N (pangola 59 mg N/l, legume diets 110–115 mg N/l) and the proportion of propionic acid in rumen fluid. Sheep given pangola + leucaena silages had significantly higher DM intakes (66·3 g/kg W0·75 per day) than sheep given pangola and pangola + cowpea silages (52·4 and 53·2 g/kg W0·75 per day respectively). The inclusion of gliricidia significantly depressed silage intake (43·1 g/kg W0·75 per day). There were no significant effects of diet on DM (551–609 g/kg) and organic matter (550–612 g/rkg) digestibility. Sheep given pangola + leucaena silages had higher N intakes, N balances, rates and efficiencies of microbial N synthesis and total non-ammonia N (NAN) flows to the small intestine than did sheep given the other silages. Apparent degradabilities of silage N in the rumen were similar for all diets (0·491–0·559 g N/kg N intake), but sheep given pangola + leucaena silages had lower true (corrected for endogenous N) N degradabilities (0·648 g N/kg N intake) than those given the other diets (0·751–0·775 g N/kg N intake). The values obtained in this experiment were compared with those reported for temperate grass silages, and it was concluded that whilst the digestibility of tropical grass/legume silages was low, intakes and rumen fermentation characteristics were similar to those found for temperate grass silages.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 120 , Issue 3 , June 1993 , pp. 407 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council (1984). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Supplement No. 1. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Ahn, J. H., Robertson, B. M., Elliott, R., Gutteridge, R. C. & Ford, C. W. (1989). Quality assessment of tropical browse legumes: tannin content and protein degradation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 27, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, D. E. (1980). The utilisation of protein in conserved forage. In Forage Conservation in the 80's (Ed. Thomas, C.), pp. 131–143. Hurley, Maidenhead: British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Gill, E. M., Evans, R. T., Gale, D. L. & Wilton, J. C. (1987). The effect of fishmeal supplementation of grass silage on nitrogen metabolism in growing cattle. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 46, 38A.Google Scholar
Catchpoole, V. R. (1970). Laboratory ensilage of three tropical pasture legumes – Phaseolus atropurpureus, Desmodium intortum and Lotononis bainsii. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 10, 568–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Thomas, P. C. & Wait, M. K. (1982). The rate of addition of formic acid to grass at ensilage and the subsequent digestion of the silage in the rumen and intestines of sheep. Grass and Forage Science 37, 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Thomas, P. C. & Quig, J. (1986). Utilization of silage nitrogen in sheep and cows: amino acid composition of duodenal digesta and rumen microbes. Grass and Forage Science 41, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, P. G. (1985). Protein degradation in the rumen of sheep fed pangola grass and siratro hay. MAS thesis, The University of Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs, 2nd edn.New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. M., Bruce, C. I., Buttery, P. J., Gill, M. & Beever, D. E. (1988). Protein metabolism in the rumen of silage-fed steers: effect of fishmeal supplementation. British Journal of Nutrition 60, 339–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downes, A. M. & McDonald, L. W. (1964). Thechromium- 51 complex of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid as a soluble rumen marker. British Journal of Nutrition 18, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliott, R. & Armstrong, D. G. (1982). The effect of urea and urea plus sodium sulphate on microbial protein production in the rumens of sheep given diets high in alkali-treated straw. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1980). The use of markers to measure digesta flow from the stomach of sheep fed once daily. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. & White, G. A. (1977). Formaldehyde treatment of concentrate diets for sheep. 1. Partition of the digestion of organic matter and nitrogen between the stomach and intestines. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 1055–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J. P. & Weston, R. H. (1967). The digestion of chopped and ground roughages by sheep. II. The digestion of nitrogen and some carbohydrate fractions in the stomach and intestines. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 18, 803–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. M., Larsen, R. E. & Lanning, N. M. (1980). Prediction of silage digestibility and intake by chemical analyses or in vitro fermentation techniques. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 579–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarrick, R. B. (1962). Effect of additives on silages made from different herbages. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 1, 267–282.Google Scholar
McDonald, P. (1981). The Biochemistry of Silage. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Morrison, I. M. (1980). Hemicellulosic contamination of acid-detergent residues and their replacement by cellulose residues in cell wall analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 39, 70A.Google Scholar
Moss, R. J., Byford, I. J. R., Winks, L., Chambers, G. & O'Grady, P. (1984). In vivo digestibility of tropical grass-legume pastures conserved as silage or hay. In Silage in the 80's (Eds Kempton, T. J., Kaiser, A. G. & Trigg, T. E.), pp. 137–140. Armidale: University of New England Press.Google Scholar
Norton, B. W. (1982). Differences between species in forage quality. In Nutritional Limits to Animal Production from Pastures (Ed. Hacker, J. B.), pp. 89–110. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Reed, J. D. (1986). Relationships among soluble phenolics, insoluble proanthocyanidins and fiber in East African browse species. Journal of Range Management 39, 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooke, J. A., Greife, H. A. & Armstrong, D. G. (1983). The digestion by cattle of grass silages made with no additive or with the application of formic acid or formic acid and formaldehyde. Grass and Forage Science 38, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooke, J. A., Brett, P. A., Overend, M. A. & Armstrong, D. G. (1985). The energetic efficiency of rumen microbial protein synthesis in cattle given silage-based diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 13, 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddons, R. C., Nolan, J. V., Beever, D. E. & MacRae, J. C. (1985). Nitrogen digestion and metabolism in sheep consuming diets containing contrasting forms and levels of N. British Journal of Nutrition 54, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, P. C., Chamberlain, D. G. & Alwash, A. H. (1976). Digestion in the stomach and intestines of sheep receiving diets of red clover silage with various supplements. Journal of the British Grassland Society 31, 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P. C., Kelly, N. C., Chamberlain, D. G. & Wait, M. K. (1980 a). The nutritive value of silages. Digestion of organic matter, gross energy and carbohydrate constituents in the rumen of sheep receiving diets of grass silage or grass silage and barley. British Journal of Nutrition 43, 481–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, C., Gill, M. & Austin, A. R. (1980 b). The effects of supplements of fishmeal and lactic acid on voluntary intake of silage by calves. Grass and Forage Science 35, 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D. J., Beever, D. E., Lonsdale, C. R., Haines, M. J., Cammell, S. B. & Austin, A. R. (1981). The digestion by cattle of grass silage made with formic acid and formic acid-formaldehyde. British Journal of Nutrition 46, 193–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tjandraatmadja, M., MacRae, I. C. & Norton, B. W. (1993). Effect of the inclusion of tropical tree legumes, Gliricidia sepium and Leucaena leucocephala, on the nutritive value of silages prepared from tropical grasses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 120, 397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Conklin, N. L. & Horvarth, P. J. (1987). Tannins in foods and feeds. In Proceedings of the Cornell Nutrition Conference, Ithaca, 1987, pp. 115–122.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J., Hutchinson, K. J., Wllson, R. F. & Harris, C. E. (1971). The voluntary intake of silage by sheep. I. Interrelationships between silage composition and intake. Journal of Agricultural Science. Cambridge, 11, 531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar