Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-13T16:54:37.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dry-matter content, leaf water potential and digestibility of three grasses in the early stages of regrowth after defoliation with and without applied nitrogen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Wilman
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
P. T. Wright
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth

Summary

The regrowth of Aberystwyth S. 22 Italian ryegrass, S. 24 perennial ryegrass and S. 37 cocksfoot was studied in field swards with and without applied nitrogen during the 21 days following a cut or grazing, there being a total of five periods of study at different times of year and in different years.

The dry-matter content of the harvested herbage deoreased by 4–8 percentage units on average from day 6 to day 18 of regrowth, supporting the evidence of earlier experiments with ryegrass and suggesting that a decrease at about this stage is typical. In the present experiments the same trend was evident after removal of surface moisture. Dry-matter content before removal of surface moisture was sometimes as low as 10%, which could adversely affect animal production. The water potential of fully expanded leaf blades was typically more negative on days 2 and 5 of regrowth than subsequently, so that the moderately high dry-matter content during the first week of regrowth seems to indicate some degree of moisture stress. Emerging leaves were less stressed than fully expanded ones during the very early stages of regrowth. Leaf water potential tended to be rather less negative in the cooksfoot than in the ryegrasses. The application of N reduced dry-matter content, but did not affect leaf water potential.

The digestibility of the harvested herbage was little affected by the stage of regrowth. The cocksfoot was less digestible than the ryegrasses. The application of N generally increased digestibility, particularly in cocksfoot.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agbiculturai, Reseabch Cotjncil (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, No. 2. Ruminants, pp. 264. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Barrs, H. D. (1968). Determination of water deficits in plant tissues. In Water Deficits and Plant Growth, vol. I (ed. Kozlowski, T. T.), pp. 235368. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Crlder, F. J. (1956). Root-growth stoppage resulting from defoliation of grass. Technical Bulletin No. 1102, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., pp. 23.Google Scholar
Dent, J. W., Aldrich, D. T. A. & Silvey, V. (1967). Systematic testing of quality in grass varieties. I. An assessment of the degree of precision obtainable in comparing in vitro digestibility figures. Journal of the British Grassland Society 22, 270276.Google Scholar
Garwood, E. A. & Tyson, K. C. (1975). The response of S.24 perennial ryegrass swards to irrigation. 2. Variation in soil- and plant-water status. Journal of grassthe British Grassland Society 30, 5162.Google Scholar
Goode, J. E. & Higgs, K. H. (1973). Water, osmotic and pressure potential relationships in apple leaves. Journal of Horticultural Science 48, 203215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halevy, A. H. (1960). The influence of progressive increase in soil moisture tension on growth and water balance of gladiolus leaves and the development of physiological indicators for irrigation. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science 76, 620630.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. K. (1974). The course and magnitude of water stress in Lolium perenne and Dactylis glomerata. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 1927.Google Scholar
Jäntti, A. &Kramer, P. J. (1956). Regrowth of pastures in relation to soil moisture and defoliation. Proceedings VII International Grassland Congress, Palmerston North, 3344.Google Scholar
Morton, A. G. & Watson, D. J. (1948). A physiological study of leaf growth. Annals of Botany New Series 12, 281310.Google Scholar
Ojuederie, B. M. (1974). Effects of nitrogenous fertilizer on grass growth. Ph.D. thesis, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Rudeforth, C. C. (1970). Soils of North Cardiganshire. Harpenden: Soil Survey of England and Wales.Google Scholar
Terry, R. A. & Tilley, J. M. A. (1964). The digestibility of the leaves and stems of perennial ryegrass, cocksfoot, timothy, tall fescue, lucerne and sanfoin, as measured by an in vitro procedure. Journal of the British Grassland Society 19, 363372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104111.Google Scholar
Whitehead, D. C. (1970). The role of nitrogen in grassthe land productivity. Bulletin 48, Commonwealth Bureau of Pastures and Field Crops. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Wilman, D. (1970). The effect of nitrogenous fertilizer on the rate of growth of Italian ryegrass. 2. Growth up to 10 weeks: dry-matter yield and digestibility. Journal of the British Grassland Society 25, 154161.Google Scholar
Wilman, D. (1975). Nitrogen and Italian ryegrass. 1. Growth up to 14 weeks: dry-matter yield and digestibility. Journal of the British Grassland Society 30, 141147.Google Scholar
Wright, P. T. (1977). Studies of regrowth after defoliation and of response to nitrogen in grasses. Ph.D. thesis, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar