Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T15:37:18.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of height of pasture and concentrate composition on dairy cows grazed on continuously stocked pastures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. Kibon  and
W. Holmes
A. Kibon
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of LondonAshford, Kent, TN25 5AH
W. Holmes
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of LondonAshford, Kent, TN25 5AH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of pasture height and of a cereal-based concentrate or a sugar-beet pulp supplement were studied with 30 spring-calving cows on continuously stocked, perennial ryegrass dominant pasture in a 3 × 3 latin-square design with periods of 4 weeks. Pastures were maintained at heights of about 5·0 cm (short) or 6·5 cm (control). On the short pasture, the two supplements had similar effects and were additive but on the control pasture, compared with sugar-beet pulp, the cereal concentrate depressed herbage intake. Average fat-corrected milk yields were 26·3 and 28·1 kg/day on short and control areas respectively. Both supplements increased milk yields by about 0·7 kg per kg OM supplied. Cows on the short pasture tended to lose weight. Supplements slightly increased live weight and sugar-beet pulp tended to increase body condition score. In observations continued after the conclusion of the main experiment the short pasture was more productive and of slightly higher nutritive value. Cows receiving the concentrate supplements increased total intake but this was reflected only in live weight. The total utilized metabolizable energy for the whole season was about 130 GJ/ha.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 109 , Issue 2 , October 1987 , pp. 293 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arriaga-Jordan, C. M. & Holmes, W. (1986 a). The effects of cereal concentrate supplementation on the digestibility of herbage-based diets for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 106, 581–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arriaga-Jordan, C. M. & Holmes, W. (1986 b). The effect of concentrate supplementation on high yielding dairy cows under two systems of grazing. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 453–461.Google Scholar
A-M. C., Baker & Leaver, J. D. (1986). Effect of stocking rate in early season on dairy cows performance and sward characteristics. Grass and Forage Science 41, 333–340.Google Scholar
Bircham, J. S. & Hodgson, J. (1983). The influence of sward condition on rates of herbage growth and senescence in mixed swards under continuous stocking management. Grass and Forage Science 38, 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hijink, J. W. F., Le Du, Y. L. P., Meijs, J. A. C. & Meijer, A. B. (1981). Supplementation of the grazing dairy cow. Paper for the IV European Grazing Workshop. Institute for Livestock Feeding and Nutrition Research, Lelystad, (Holland), Report No. 141, 12 pp.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J., Arosteguy, J. C. & Forbes, T. D. A. (1985). Mixed grazing by sheep and cattle: effects on herbage production and utilization. 15th International Grassland Congress, Tokyo, Japan 1984, pp. 82–93.Google Scholar
Jennings, P. G. (1983). Studies on the influence of supplementary feeding on the performance of grazing dairy cows. Ph.D. thesis, Wye College, University of London.Google Scholar
Jennings, P. G. & Holmes, W. (1984). Supplementary feeding of dairy cows on continuously stocked pasture. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103, 161–170.Google Scholar
Journet, M. & Demarquilly, C. (1979). Grazing. In Feeding Strategy for the High Yielding Dairy Cow (ed. Broster, W. H. and Swan, H.), pp. 225–231. European Association of Animal Production Publication 25. London: Granada.Google Scholar
Kibon, A. (1986). Studies on the response to supplementary feeds by dairy cattle at pasture. Ph.D. thesis, Wye College, University of London.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D., Campling, R. C. & Holmes, W. (1968). Use of supplementary feeds for grazing dairy cows. Dairy Science Abstracts 30, 355–361.Google Scholar
Meijs, J. A. C. (1986). Comparison of starchy and fibrous concentrates for grazing dairy cows. In Grazing (ed. Frame, J.), British Grassland Society Occasional Symposium No. 19, pp. 129–137.Google Scholar
Meijs, J. A. C. & Hoekstra, J. A. (1984). Concentrate supplementation of dairy cows. I. Effect of concentrate intake and herbage allowance on herbage intake. Grass and Forage Science 39, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, J. A., Maxwell, T. J. & Souter, W. (1981). Effect of supplementary feeding and herbage mass on the intake and performance of grazing ewes in early lactation. Animal Production 32, 185–195.Google Scholar
Moe, P. W., Tyrrell, H. F. & Flatt, W. P. (1971). Energetics of body tissue metabolism. Journal of Dairy Science 54, 548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, A. J., Leafe, E. L. & Penning, P. D. (1983). Crop physiological limitations to production under continuous and rotational grazing. In Efficient Grassland Farming (ed. Corrall, A. J.), pp. 145–148. Proceedings of the 9th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation Occasional Symposium No. 14. Hurley: British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
Stuth, J. W., Kibby, D. R. & Chmielewski, R. E. (1981). Effect of herbage allowance on the efficiency of defoliation by the grazing animal. Grass and Forage Science 36, 9–16.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D. (1981). Concentrate feeding and milk production. In Recent Advances in Ruminant Nutrition (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 35–48. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar