Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T04:14:49.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of breed, breeding system and other factors on lamb mortality: 2. Factors influencing the incidence of delayed birth, dystokia, congenital defects and miscellaneous causes of early death

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Carol Woolliams ,
G. Wiener  and
N. S. M. Macleod
Carol Woolliams
Affiliation:
gricultural Research Council Animal Breeding Research Organisation, King's Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JQ
G. Wiener
Affiliation:
gricultural Research Council Animal Breeding Research Organisation, King's Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JQ
N. S. M. Macleod
Affiliation:
Veterinary Investigation Centre, East of Scotland College of Agriculture, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0QE
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The incidence of a number of causes of death of lambs around the time of birth was examined in relation to breed, inbreeding, birth weight, birth type, sex of lamb, week of birth and parity. Data were from a grazing flock on an upland farm over a 6-year period. The breeds were the Scottish Blackface, Cheviot, and Welsh Mountain and the crosses among them. Each breed and cross was maintained at five levels of inbreeding ranging from zero to 59% inbreeding coefficient.

The incidence of delayed birth varied significantly among the breeds and crosses with the Welsh having the lowest incidence. Compared with the pure breeds the crosses showed a lower incidence of both delayed birth and preparturient deaths, but significantly only for the latter.

Dystokia was classified according to whether it arose from the relative dimensions of lamb and dam or from malpresentation. For both types the heaviest lambs had the highest incidence but the association with birth weight was much stronger for dystokia involving dimensions. Breed variation was not significant, but cross-breds had the highest frequency for the dimensions category and the lowest for malpresentation. Singles were at greater risk than twins as were lambs born to a first parity.

Congenital defects as a cause of death were divided into six categories. Only skeletal defects varied significantly among breeds and the incidence increased with inbreeding, but crosses of inbred lines did not have the lowest frequency. For congenital defects overall and for hydrocephalus and hydronephrosis in particular, line crosses (noninbred) had the lowest incidence and 25% inbred lambs the highest, the frequency declining with further inbreeding. None of the other factors considered affected variation in the incidence of any of these defects to a significant extent.

Liver rupture and brain haemorrhage were most frequent in heavy lambs, singles and lambs born to a first parity dam.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 100 , Issue 3 , June 1983 , pp. 553 - 561
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bekedam, M. (1974). A crossbreeding experiment with Texel and Flemish sheep, preliminary results. In Proceedings of the Working Symposium on Breed Evaluation and Grossing Experiments with Farm Animals, Zeist, 1974, pp. 407–419. Research Institute for Animal Husbandry ‘Schoonoord’, Zeist, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Dalton, D. C, Knight, T. W. & Johnson, D. L. (1980). Lamb survival in sheep breeds on New Zealand hill country. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, S. M. (1965). Congenital abnormalities in sheep in Western Australia. Journal of the Department of Agriculture of Western Australia 6, 691–693.Google Scholar
Doney, J. M. (1966). Inbreeding depression in grazing Blackface sheep. Animal Production 8, 261–266.Google Scholar
Ercanbrack, S. K. & Knight, A. D. (1978). Frequencies of various birth defects of Targhee and Columbia sheep. Journal of Heredity 69, 237–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fogarty, N. M. (1971). Some aspects of lamb losses in Dorset and Border Leicester sheep. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 18, 20–22.Google Scholar
Fogarty, N. M. & Thompson, J. M. (1974). Relationship between pelvic dimensions, other body measurements and dystokia in Dorset Horn ewes. Australian Veterinary Journal 50, 502–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, R. G. (1968). A note on difficult birth in Scottish hill flocks. Animal Production 10, 213–215.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. G. & Robinson, J. F. (1963). Lamb mortality in Scottish hill flocks. Animal Production 5, 67–76.Google Scholar
Hughes, K. L., Hartley, W. J., Haughey, K. G. & McFarlane, D. (1964). A study of perinatal mortality of lambs from the Oberon and Monaro districts of N.S.W. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 5, 92–99.Google Scholar
Johnston, W. S. (1977). Caithness sheep loss survey: perinatal lamb losses. In Perinatal Losses in Lambs. A collection of papers from a symposium at Stirling University, 02 1975. Publication of the Bast of Scotland College of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Johnston, W. S., Maclachlan, G. K. & Murray, I. S. (1980). A survey of sheep losses and their causes on commercial farms in the north of Scotland. Veterinary Record 106, 238–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leech, F. B., Vessey, M. P. & Menzies, D. W. (1964). An analysis of the results of post-mortem examinations of sheep. 11 1959–October 1961. In Animal Diseases Surveys: Report No. 3. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
McFarlane, D. (1965). Perinatal lamb losses. I. An autopsy method for the investigation of perinatal losses. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 13, 116–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGloughlin, P. & Curran, S. (1969). A comparison of 4 breeds of sheep as dams for fat lamb production. 1. Reproductive performance and fleece weight. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 67–79.Google Scholar
McGuirk, B. J. (1977). Heterosis in crosses between sheep breeds. In 3rd International Congress of the Society for the Advancement of Breeding Researches in Asia and Oceania. Canberra, Australia, February 1977, pp. 6–19 to 6–22.Google Scholar
Purser, A. F. & Young, G. B. (1964). Mortality among twin and single lambs. Animal Production 6, 321–329.Google Scholar
Saunders, R. W. (1977). Perinatal lamb mortality associated with lowland grassland systems. In Perinatal Losses in Lambs. A collection of papers from a symposium at Stirling University, February 1975. Publication of the East of Scotland College of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Sidwell, G. M. & Miller, L. R. (1971). Production in some pure breeds of sheep and their crosses. 1. Reproductive efficiency in ewes. Journal of Animal Science 32, 1084–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slee, J., Griffiths, R. G. & Samson, D. E. (1980). Hypothermia in newborn lambs induced by experimental immersion in a water bath and by natural exposure outdoors. Research in Veterinary Science 28, 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamp, J. T. (1967). Perinatal loss in lambs with particular reference to diagnosis. Veterinary Record 81, 530–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiener, G. (1967). A comparison of the body size, fleece weight and maternal performance of five breeds of sheep kept in one environment. Animal Production 9, 177–195.Google Scholar
Wiener, G., Woolliams, C. & Macleod, N. S. M. (1983). The effects of breed, breeding system and other factors on lamb mortality. 1. Causes of death and effects on the incidence of losses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 539–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, G. B. (1967). Hereditary diseases in livestock. Veterinary Record 81, 606–617.Google ScholarPubMed