Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-23T15:22:31.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of site of seed production on seed yields and regrowth of progeny tubers in potatoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. J. O'Brien  and
E. J. Allen
P. J. O'Brien
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture (Crop Husbandry), University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed
E. J. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture (Crop Husbandry), University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Nine experiments are reported in which effects of site of seed production on dormancy, sprout and field growth of progeny tubers were recorded. The experiments used early varieties, Home Guard (four experiments), Red Craigs Royal (three experiments) and Arran Comet (two experiments) and in each, seed crops were grown with similar husbandry at sites differing in altitude and location in western England and Wales. There was no consistent effect of site of seed production on the timing of the end of dormancy, and the maximum effect in any year was 11 ± 1·2 (S.E.) days. The small effects of site on dormancy influenced initial sprout lengths, and this effect usually persisted up to planting in Home Guard and Red Craigs Royal, although the effects were small in magnitude. There was no effect of site of seed production on sprout lengths at planting or on field growth and yields in Arran Comet. In the other two varieties there was no effect of site of seed production on yield at early harvests, but at later harvests seed from cooler upland sites sometimes significantly outyielded lowland seed. There was, therefore, no evidence to support the view that locally produced seed was advantageous for early potato production. The results, together with those of the concurrent series with maincrop varieties reported by Wurr (1979), show that on half the occasions on which yields were measured covering the whole of the harvesting period, site of seed production had no effect on yields. In these experiments with early varieties effects of site occurred only at harvests later than the commercial harvesting of such old seed. It is therefore suggested that site of seed production is a much less important determinant of tuber yield than hitherto suggested, and of little practical significance.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 107 , Issue 1 , August 1986 , pp. 83 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E. J. (1977). Effects of date of planting on growth and yield of contrasting potato varieties in Pembrokeshire. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 711–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, E. J., Bean, J. N., Griffith, R. L. & O'Brien, P. J. (1979). Effects of length of sprouting period on growth and yield of contrasting early potato varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, E. J. & Scott, R. K. (1980). An analysis of growth of the potato crop. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 583–606.Google Scholar
Al-Rawi, A. W. (1981). Effect of storage temperature on the growth and development of contrasting varieties of potatoes. Ph.D. thesis, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Asfary, A. F., Wild, A. & Harris, P. M. (1983). Growth, mineral nutrition and water use by potato crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 87–101.Google Scholar
Bean, J. N. (1981). Density studies with early potato cultivars. Ph.D. thesis, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Broadbent, L., Brown, P. H. & Wright, R. C. M. (1961). Home production of seed for early potatoes. 2. Comparison of home produced and imported seed. Experimental Horticulture 5, 37–39.Google Scholar
Burton, W. G. (1966). Effect of source of seed upon yield. In The Potato, pp. 130–131. Wageningen: European Association for Potato Research.Google Scholar
Chase, R. W. (1974). Harvesting date and yielding potential on Onaway and Sebago seed potatoes. American Potato Journal 5, 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, A. E. (1972). Effects of seed source and size on bulking in the early potato crop. Experimental Husbandry 21, 40–41.Google Scholar
Goodwin, P. B., Brown, A., Lennard, J. H. & Milthorpe, F. L. (1969a). Effect of centre of production, maturity and storage treatment of seed tubers on growth of early potatoes. I. Sprout development in storage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 73, 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, P. B.Brown, A., Lennard, J. H. & Milthorpe, F. L. (1969b). Effect of centre of production, maturity and storage treatment of seed tubers on growth of early potatoes. II. Field growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 73, 167–176.Google Scholar
Griffith, R. L., Allen, E. J., O'Brien, S. A. & O'Brien, P. J. (1984). Comparison of growth and early yields of potato varieties of contrasting maturity classification at three sites. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103, 443–458.Google Scholar
Jones, J. L. (1981). Effect of date of planting on contrasting potato varieties. Ph.D. thesis, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Jones, J. L. & Allen, E. J. (1983). Effects of date of planting on plant emergence, leaf growth, and yield in contrasting potato varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. J. A. (1972). The measurement of mean temperatures by the sucrose inversion method. Soils and Fertilizers 35 (6), 615–669.Google Scholar
Kawakami, K. (1952). Physiological aspects of potato seed tubers. Memoirs of the Hyogo University of Agriculture 2, 1–114.Google Scholar
Kozlowska, A. (1963). Differences in growth and metabolism of potatoes grown in the mountains and in the lowlands. European Potato Journal 6 (3), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesozynski, D. B. & Tanner, C. B. (1976). Seasonal variation of root distribution of irrigated field-grown Russet Burbank potatoes. American Potato Journal 53, 69–78.Google Scholar
Madec, P. & Perennec, P. (1956). Influence of the ‘origin’ on the behaviour of potato plants. Annales de l' Amélioration des Plantes 1, 5–26 (translation).Google Scholar
Murphy, H. J., Manzer, F. E., Govern, M. J. & Merriman, D. C. (1967). Effect of physiological maturity and storage temperature on emergence and yield of potatoes. American Potato Journal 44, 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, P. J. (1981). Effects of seed crop treatments on the growth and yield of progeny tubers of early potato cultivars. Ph.D. thesis, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
O'Brien, P. J., Allen, E. J., Bean, J. N., Griffith, R. L., Jones, S. A. & Jones, J. L. (1983). Accumulated day-degrees as a measure of physiological age and the relationships with growth and yield in early potatoes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 613–631.Google Scholar
Ronsen, K. (1971). Seed potatoes grown at different altitudes and different temperatures. Forskning og forsok i landbruket 22, 241–266.Google Scholar
Scott, R. K. & Younger, A. (1973). Growth, development and yield following different pre-treatments of seed potatoes. Proceedings of the 5th Triennial Conference of the European Association for Potato Research, Norwich 1972, p. 113.Google Scholar
Soil Survey of England and Wales (1984). Soils of England and Wales, Bulletin No. 11. Soil Survey Unit, Rothamsted, Harpenden.Google Scholar
Steckel, J. R. A. & Gray, D. (1979). Drought tolerance in potatoes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 375–381.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. L. & Eyre, R. W. (1950). Early Potatoes. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Thow, R. F. (1970). Second generation effects of N, P and K on the potato. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Toosey, R. D. (1964 a). The pre-sprouting of seed potatoes: factors affecting sprout growth and subsequent yield. Part I. Field Crop Abstracts 17 (3), 161–168.Google Scholar
Toosey, R. D. (1964 b). The pre-sprouting of seed potatoes: factors affecting sprout growth and subsequent yield. Part II. Field Crop Abstracts 17 (4), 239–244.Google Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. (1978 a). The effects of the date of defoliation of the seed potato crop and the storage temperature of the seed on subsequent growth. I. Sprout growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 737–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. (1978 b). The effeots of the date of defoliation of the seed potato crop and the storage temperature of the seed on subsequent growth. II. Field growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 747–756.Google Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. (1979). The effect of the site of seed potato production on subsequent sprout growth and tuber yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. & Allen, E. J. (1976). Effects of cold treatments on the sprout growth of three potato varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 221–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar