Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:26:51.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of three different growth rates on empty body weight, carcass weight and dissected carcass composition of cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. M. Murray ,
N. M. Tulloh  and
W. H. Winter
D. M. Murray
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia
N. M. Tulloh
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia
W. H. Winter
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A study was made of the effect on body composition of growing Angus steers from 300 to 440 kg at three different rates. The rates were: High (H) 0·8 kg/day, Low (L) 0·4 kg/day and High-Maintenance (HM) 0·8 kg/day followed by a period during which body weight was maintained constant.

The animals were individually penned and the different growth rates were achieved by controlling intakes of a pelleted feed. Two animals (part of H treatment) were killed at 300 kg and the remaining 27 animals (nine in each treatment), were killed at common body weights of 330, 363, 400 and 440 kg.

Analyses of covariance were used to compare linear regression equations representing results from each treatment. In order to do this, the logarithmic transformation of the allometric equation, y = axb, was used. As a proportion of empty body weight (EBW), hot carcass weight (HCW) was greater in both the HM and L groups than in the H group, indicating a greater offal component of EBW in the H animals. The loss in weight of the dressed carcass during storage at 2 °C for 24 h was similar in all three groups and was 0·98% of HCW. The proportions of HCW in the fore- and hind-quarters were similar in each group.

At the same dissected side weight (DSW), the weight of bone was significantly greater in both the HM and L groups than in the H group indicating that bone development was related to both age and carcass weight. There were no significant differences between the groups in the proportions of either muscle or total fat. However, the proportion of kidney and channel fat in the H group was greater than in the HM and L groups and the proportion of subcutaneous fat was also greater in the H than in the L group. The amount of connective tissue in the three groups followed, in general, group differences in bone. Analyses of the dissected components of the separate fore- and hind-quarters showed that the difference between the H and L groups in the proportion of subcutaneous fat in the DSW was due to a relatively greater development of this fat in the fore-quarter of the H animals.

No differences were found between treatments in the proportion of ‘expensive muscles’ relative to total side muscle (TSM). However, there were treatment effects on the proportions of TSM formed by certain groups of muscles; two examples are: the proportion of group 4 muscles (abdominal muscles) was higher and the proportion of group 6 muscles (distal muscles of the fore-leg) was lower in the H than in the L treatments. Bone weight distribution was similar in all treatments.

There were differences between the H and HM groups in the relative growth ratios for all fat tissues (subcutaneous, intermuscular and kidney and channel fat) compared with total side fat. However, in the H and L groups, the relative growth ratios for corresponding fat categories were similar. The weight of kidney and channel fat in the left side of the carcass was significantly greater than in the right side of the carcass in all treatments.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 82 , Issue 3 , June 1974 , pp. 535 - 547
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allden, W. G. (1970). The effects of nutritional deprivation on the subsequent productivity of sheep and cattle. Nutrition Abstract and Reviews 40, 1167–84.Google Scholar
Brannang, E. (1966). Studies on monozygous cattle twins. XVIII. The effect of castration on the growth rate, feed conversion and carcass traits of Swedish Red and White cattle. Lantbrukshögskolans Annaler, 32, 329–415.Google Scholar
Brungardt, V. H. & Bray, R. W. (1963). Variation between sides in the beef carcass for certain wholesale and retail yields and linear carcass measurements. Journal of Animal Science 22, 746–8.Google Scholar
Butler, O. D., Garber, M. J. & Smith, R. L. (1956). Beef carcass composition and yield of wholesale cuts as estimated from left and right sides. Journal of Animal Science 15, 891–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. (1963). Estimation of carcass composition; the anatomical approach. In Symposium on Carcass Composition and Appraisal of Meat Animals (ed. Tribe, D. E.), 4–1 to 4–13. Melbourne, Australia: C.S.I.R.O.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. (1965). The relationship of carcass measurements and dissection data to beef carcass composition. Research in Veterinary Science 6, 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. (1966). The effect of nutritional stress and recovery on the body composition of cattle. Research in Veterinary Science 7, 168–79.Google Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1944). The food value of beef from steers and heifers, and its relation to dressing-out percentage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 34, 177–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1961). Comparative studies of meat VII. A comparison between Hereford, Dairy Shorthorn and Friesian steers on four levels of nutrition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 56, 265–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, D. J., Leng, R. A. & Corbett, J. L. (1972). Undernutrition in grazing sheep. I. Changes in the body composition of the body, blood and rumen contents. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 483–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goll, D. E., Kline, E. A. & Hazel, L. N. (1961). Influence of beef carcass grade and weight on yield of wholesale cuts and carcass measurements. Journal of Animal Science 20, 260–3.Google Scholar
Guenther, J. J., Bushman, D. H., Pope, L. S. & Morrison, R. D. (1965). Growth and development of the major carcass tissues in beef calves from weaning to slaughter weight, with reference to the effect of plane of nutrition. Journal of Animal Science 24, 1184–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, R. G. (1965). Levels of first winter feeding in relation to performance of Cheviot hill ewes. III. Tissue and joint development to 12 and 18 months of age. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 64, 311–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilbert, H. R., Hart, G. H., Wagnon, K. A. & Goss, H. (1944). The importance of continuous growth in beef cattle. University of California Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin No. 688.Google Scholar
Henrickson, R. L., Pope, L. S. & Hendrickson, R. F. (1965). Effect of rate of gain of fattening beef calves on carcass composition. Journal of Animal Science 24, 507–13.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. S. (1932). Problems of Relative Growth. London: Methuen Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. R., Butterfield, R. M. & Pryor, W. J. (1972). Studies of fat distribution in the bovine carcass. I. The partition of fatty tissues between depots. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 381–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, D. M., McManus, W. R. & Freer, M. (1969). Changes in the body composition and efficiency of mature sheep during loss and regain of liveweight. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 139–47.Google Scholar
Kruger, T. H. (1968). Developmental changes in beef cattle. Agriculture Research (South African Department of Agriculture Technical Service Report) Part I, 249–53.Google Scholar
Lawes, J. B. & Gilbert, J. H. (1859). Experimental inquiry into the composition of some of the animals fed and slaughtered as human food. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 149, 493–578.Google Scholar
Matthews, D. J. & Bennett, J. A. (1962). Effect of preslaughter rate of gain upon tenderness and other carcass characteristics of beef. Journal of Animal Science 21, 738–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940). Growth and development in the pig with special reference to carcass quality. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 30, 276–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, C. R., Trowbridge, P. F. & Haigh, L. D. (1921). Studies in animal nutrition. I. Changes in form and weight on different planes of nutrition. University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin No. 43.Google Scholar
Moulton, C. R., Trowbridge, P. F. & Haigh, L. D. (1922 a). Studies in animal nutrition. II. Changes in the proportions of the carcass and offal on different planes of nutrition. University of Minnesota Agricultural Experimental Station Research Bulletin No. 34.Google Scholar
Moulton, C. R., Trowbridge, P. F. & Haigh, L. D. (1922 b). Studies in animal nutrition. III. Changes in chemical composition on different planes of nutrition. University of Minnesota agricultural Experimental Station Research Bulletin No. 55.Google Scholar
Murray, D. M. (1971). Growth rate and body composition of cattle. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Palsson, H. & Verges, J. B. (1952 a). Effects of the plane of nutrition on growth and the development of carcass quality in lambs. I. The effect of high and low planes of nutrition at different ages. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 42, 1–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palsson, H. & Verges, J. B. (1952 b). Effects of plane of nutrition on growth and the development of carcass quality in lambs. II. Effects on lambs of 30 lb carcass weight. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 42, 93–149.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, R. W. (1941). The effect of a submaintenance diet on the composition of the pig. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 31, 50–73.Google Scholar
Prescott, J. H. D. (1965). The influence of different systems of beef production on carcass characteristics and meat quality. British Grassland Society, Occasional Symposium No. 2, 99–109.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. (1967). Developmental growth and body weight loss of cattle. I. Experimental design, body weight growth, and the effects of developmental growth and body weight loss on the dressed carcass and the offal. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 18, 1015–31.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. & Tulloh, N. M. (1968). Developmental growth and body weight loss of cattle. III. Dissected components of the commercially dressed carcass, following anatomical boundaries. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 673–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical methods. 6th ed.Iowa State Univ. Press: Ames.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. (1964). The relationship between growth and carcass quality in cattle and sheep. A review. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 32, 191–204.Google Scholar
Trowbridge, P. F., Moulton, C. R. & Haigh, L. D. (1918). The effect of limited food on the growth of young beef animals. Univeisity of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin No. 28.Google Scholar
Tulloh, N. M. (1964). The carcass composition of sheep, cattle and pigs as functions of body weight. In Symposium on Carcass Composition and Appraisal of Meat Animals(ed.Tribe, D. E.), 5–1 to 5–16. C.S.I.R.O., Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Verbeek, W. A. (1961). The effect of nutritional plane on the composition of the beef calf. South African Journal of Agricultural Science 4, 71–82.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1948 a). The growth of lambs before and after birth in relation to the level of nutrition. Part I. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 38, 93–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1948 b). The growth of lambs before and after birth in relation to the level of nutrition. Parts II and III. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 38, 243–302.Google Scholar
Warwick, E. J., Davis, R. E. & Hiner, R. L. (1964). Response of monozygotic bovine twins to high and low concentrate rations. Journal of Animal Science 23, 78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B. R. (1968). Performance and carcass characteristics of pigs grown along three growth curves to bacon weight. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture Animal Husbandry 8, 162–7.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. N. & Osbourn, D. F. (1960). Compensatory growth after undernutrition in mammals and birds. Biological Reviews 35, 324–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winchester, C. F., Davis, R. E. & Hiner, R. L. (1967). Malnutrition of young cattle: effect on feed utilization, eventual body size, and meat quality. Technical Bulletin U.S. Department of Agriculture No. 1374.Google Scholar
Winchester, C. F. & Ellis, N. R. (1956). Delayed growth of beef cattle. Technical Bulletin U.S. Department of Agriculture No. 1159.Google Scholar
Winchester, C. F. & Howe, P. E. (1955). Relative effects of continuous and interrupted growth on beef steers. Technical Bulletin U.S. Department of Agriculture No. 1108.Google Scholar