Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T09:09:42.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of various hand-weeding programmes on yield and components of yield of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) grown in the tropical lowlands of Papua New Guinea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. P. Levett
M. P. Levett
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Industry, Laloki Plant Quarantine and Horticultural Research Station, Central Province, Papua New Guinea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of weed competition, harvest date and cultivar on sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas(L.) Lam.) yield and components of yield were investigated in three factorial experiments planted during the wet seasons of 1984 (Expt 1) and 1986 (Expts 2 and 3) in the tropical lowlands In Expts 1 and 2, the commencement of regular hand-weeding (every 14 days) was delayed for varying lengths of time following planting. In Expt 3, the duration of hand-weeding from planting onwards was varied. The main competing weed species following planting were Cyperus rotundus, C. brevifolius, Euphorbia geniculata and Portulaca oleracea. After canopy closure, E. hirta, Imperata cylindrica, Eleusine indica, Sida rhombifolia, Mollugo pentaphylla and Mimosa invisa were the predominant weeds to emerge and persist. Cultivars differed in their sensitivity to weed competition. In L431 both mean marketable root tuber weight and number of tubers/plant were severely reduced. However, in L44, tuber number was more sensitive than tuber weight: marketable tuber weight was significantly reduced only by prolonged weed competition (no weeding until 56 days after planting (DAP)). In Expts 1 and 2, delaying the commencement of weeding beyond 14 DAP significantly decreased vine weight, total yield and mean number of tubers/plant. In Expt 3, prolonging regular weeding until 14 DAP and longer significantly increased total and marketable tuber yield and mean number of tubers/plant.

Effects of weed competition in the early part of the season during the first 28–42 DAP substantially reduced crop production in the later part of the growth cycle (after 110 DAP). This was probably due to a partial suppression of vine growth early on, which reduced tuberous root initiation and thus limited the number of root tubers that could develop in the later stages of crop growth. Hand-weeding during the period 28–42 DAP also appeared to have a detrimental effect on tuber initiation as a result of mechanical root disturbance at this sensitive period of root differentiation. There was also a trend towards lower yields when the crop was regularly hand-weeded after 56 DAP, probably due to disturbance of the vine canopy.

The critical period for weed competition commenced at or before 14 DAP, possibly as early as 7 DAP, and did not continue beyond 56 DAP. In order to avoid weed competition and the detrimental mechanical effects of hand-weeding, an optimum hand-weeding programme for sweet potato in the tropical lowlands of will probably involve (i) keeping the crop weedfree for the first 14–21 DAP; (ii) no crop disturbance during the period of maximum tuberous root initiation (from c. 21–28 DAP until 42–56 DAP); (iii) clean weeding at c. 56 DAP; and (iv) minimal or no weeding after 56 DAP. Weeding during the period 7–14 DAP is particularly important.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 118 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 63 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bourke, R. M. (1985). Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) production and research in Papua New Guinea. Papua New Guinea Journal of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 33, 89–108.Google Scholar
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (1973). 1972 Report, Ibadan: IITA.Google Scholar
Kasasian, L. & Seeyave, J. (1969). Critical periods for weed competition. Pest Articles and News Summaries 15, 208–212.Google Scholar
King, G. A. (1985). The effect of time of planting on yield of six varieties of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) in the southern coastal lowlands of Papua New Guinea. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 62, 225–228.Google Scholar
Koch, W., Beshir, M. E. & Unterladstatter, R. (1983). Crop loss due to weeds. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin 30, 103–111.Google Scholar
Le Clerk, E. L. (1971). Field experiments for assessment of crop losses. In Crop Loss Assessment Methods (Ed. Chiarappa, L.), pp. 2.1/1–11. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Nieto H, J., Brondo, M. A. & Gonzalez, J. T. (1968). Critical periods of the crop growth cycle for competition from weeds. Pest Articles and News Summaries (C) 14, 159–166.Google Scholar
Parker, C. & Fryer, J. D. (1975). Weed control problems causing major reductions in world food supplies. Food and Agriculture Organisation Plant Protection Bulletin 23, 83–95.Google Scholar
Talatala, R. L., Mariscal, A. M. & Secreto, A. L. (1978). Critical periods for weed control in sweet potatoes. Philippine Journal of Weed Science 5, 1–6.Google Scholar
Unamma, R. P. A., Enyinnia, T. & Emezie, J. F. (1985). Critical period of weed interference in cocoyam/ maize/sweet potato intercrop. Tropical Pest Management 31, 21–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Heemst, H. D. J. (1985). The influence of weed competition on crop yield. Agricultural Systems 18, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, S. E. (1984). Critical period of weed competition in three vegetable crops in relation to management practices. Weed Research 24, 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, L. A. (1982). Tuberization in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam). In Sweet Potato. Proceedings of the First International Symposium (Eds Villareal, R. L. & Griggs, T. D.), pp. 79–94. Shanhua, Tainan, Taiwan: Asian Vegetable Research and Development Centre.Google Scholar