Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T04:22:24.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficiency of utilization of energy for egg production in feed-restricted single comb White Leghorn hens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. A. Degen ,
M. Kam  and
A. Rosenstrauch
A. A. Degen
Affiliation:
Isan Center for Comparative Medicine and Desert Animal Research, Jacob Blaustein Institute for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
M. Kam
Affiliation:
Isan Center for Comparative Medicine and Desert Animal Research, Jacob Blaustein Institute for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
A. Rosenstrauch
Affiliation:
Isan Center for Comparative Medicine and Desert Animal Research, Jacob Blaustein Institute for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel Poultry Extension Service, Ministry of Agriculture, P.O. Box 48, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Egg production and body mass changes were measured in six groups, each containing 10 single comb White Leghorn (SCWL) hens, in which each group received decreasing amounts of dry matter (D.M.) in decrements of 10%. Group 1 received 101·2 g D.M./day (100%), an amount normally offered these hens, whereas group 6 received 52·8 g D.M./day (50%). Egg production remained relatively high but body mass declined rapidly in the feed-restricted groups when compared with group 1 in the first 4 weeks (period I); in the second 4 weeks (period II), egg production declined to a great extent but body mass remained constant. Egg production and egg mass were significantly lower in period II than in period I in the feed-restricted birds. In period I egg production did not decrease significantly until the hens were restricted in feed by 30%; in period II this occurred at 20% feed restriction. Energy of eggs produced as a fraction of metabolizable energy intake (MEI) tended to increase in the feed-restricted groups when compared with group I in period I, but decreased significantly at the 40% and 50% group in period II. Maintenance energy requirements for the hens were 569·2 kJ/kg0·75 per day and the efficiency of utilization of energy for egg production was 88·2% in period I; these values were 551·6 kJ/kg0·75 per day and 74·0%, respectively, in period II. Energy yielded from the catabolism of body tissue per gram body mass loss was 23·08 kJ.

It was concluded that the hens initially maintained near-normal egg production at the expense of body energy reserves and then at the expense of egg mass. The efficiency of utilization of energy for egg production was higher when the energy source was mainly from body energy reserves than from MEI (88·2% v. 74·0%). The level of feed restriction and its length of imposition, the body energy reserves of the hen and the source of energy for egg production can explain many of the different responses reported in feed-restricted laying hens. In addition, reduction of 20 to 30 % feed intake in laying hens had little effect on egg production for a short period (4 weeks) during which time the hens mobilized body energy reserves. If these hens were to be sold, then this would add an additional option to this enterprise; that is, reduce feed cost at the expense of body mass prior to the sale of the hens.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 111 , Issue 2 , October 1988 , pp. 303 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bondi, A. (1982). Nutrition and animal productivity. In Handbook of Agricultural Productivity, vol. II (ed. Rechcigl, M.), pp. 195–212. Boca Raton, Florida, U.S.A.: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth, with Special Reference to the Efficiency Complex in Domestic Animals. New York: Reinhold Publishing.Google Scholar
Burlacu, G. & Baltac, M. (1971). Efficiency of the utilization of the energy of food in laying hens. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 405–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, R. M. & Robel, R. J. (1974). Bioenergetics of the bobwhite. Journal of Wildlife Management 38, 638–652.Google Scholar
Chwalibog, A. (1982). Energy efficiency for egg production. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, European Association for Animal Production, Publication No. 29 (ed. Ekern, A. and Sundstol, F.), pp. 270–273.Google Scholar
Combs, G. F., Gattis, B. & Shaffner, C. S. (1961). Studies with laying hens. 2. Energy restriction. Poultry Science 40, 220–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Groote, G. (1974). Utilisation of metabolisable energy. In Energy Requirements of Poultry (ed. Morris, T. R. and Freeman, B. M.), pp. 113–133. Edinburgh: British Poultry Science Limited.Google Scholar
Donaldson, W. E. & Millar, R. I. (1962). Effects of energy restriction on laying hens. Poultry Science 41, 353–359.Google Scholar
El-Wally, A. J. (1966). Energy requirements for egg laying and incubation in the zebra finch, Taeniopygia castanotis. Condor 68, 582–594.Google Scholar
Glatz, P. C., Polkinghorne, R. W. & Howard, B. (1987). Physiological relationships with production measures in White Leghorns subjected to restricted feeding from 18 weeks of age. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38, 445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimbergen, A. H. M. (1970). The energy requirement for maintenance and production of laying hens. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 18, 195–206.Google Scholar
Heywang, B. W. (1940). The effect of restricted food intake on egg weight, egg production and body weight. Poultry Science 19, 29–34.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, L. & Schiemann, R. (1973). Utilization of dietary energy in laying hens. Archives of Animal Nutrition 23, 105–132 (in German with English summary).Google Scholar
Jackson, N. (1970). The effect of restricting the individual daily energy intake of caged layers on the efficiency of egg production. British Poultry Science 11, 93–102.Google Scholar
Kam, M. & Degen, A. A. (1987). Effects of dry-matter intake and egg production on water influx in single comb White Leghorn hens. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109, 453–458.Google Scholar
Kirchgessner, M. (1982). Efficiency of utilization of dietary energy by the laying hen in relation to different energy and protein supply. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, European Association for Animal Production, Publication No. 29 (ed. Ekern, A. and Sundstol, F.), pp. 266–269.Google Scholar
Leclercq, B. (1986). Energy requirements of avian species. In Nutrient Requirements of Poultry and Nutritional Research (ed. Fisher, C. and Boorman, K. N.), pp. 125–138. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Leclercq, B. & Blum, J. C. (1980). Etude du rationnement de la poule pondeuse avec des regimes a teneurs differentes en proteines. Annales de Zootechnie 29, 13–21.Google Scholar
MacLeod, M. G. & Shannon, D. W. F. (1978). Effects of food intake regulation on the energy metabolism of laying hens. British Poultry Science 19, 349–363.Google Scholar
MgGinnis, J. & Dronawat, N. (1967). Do laying hens need all of the feed they consume? Feedstuffs, Minneapolis 39, 1–22.Google Scholar
Matsoukas, J., Skoglund, W. C. & Whittaker, D. (1980). Feed restriction in laying hens. Poultry Science 59, 693–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, P. W. & Tyrrell, H. F. (1974). Observations on the efficiency of metabolizable energy for meat and milk production. In Nutritional Conference for Feed Manufacturers (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 27–36. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Singsen, E. P., Matterson, L. D., Tlustohowitz, J. & Potter, L. M. (1959). The effect of controlled feeding, energy intake and type of diet on the performance of heavy-type laying hens. Bulletin of Storrs Agricultural Experimental Station, No. 346.Google Scholar
Snetsinger, D. C. & Zimmerman, R. A. (1974). Limiting the energy of laying hens. In Energy Requirements of Poultry (ed. Morris, T. R. and Freeman, B. M.), pp. 185–199. Edinburgh: British Poultry Science Limited.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. H. (1972). The energy cost of egg production. In Egg Formation and Production (ed. Freeman, B. M. and Lake, P. E.), pp. 187–196. Edinburgh: British Poultry Science Limited.Google Scholar
Tasaki, I. & Sasa, Y. (1970). Energy metabolism in laying hens. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals (ed. Schurch, A. and Wenk, C.), pp. 197–200. Zurich: Juris, Druck Verlag.Google Scholar
Van Es, A. J. H., Vik-Mo, L., Jansen, H., Bosch, A., Spreeuwenberg, W., Vogt, J. E. & Nijkamp, H. J. (1970). Balance trials in laying hens. In Energy metabolism of Farm Animals (ed. Schurch, A. and Wenk, C.), pp. 201–204. Zurich: Juris, Druck Verlag.Google Scholar
Walter, E. D. & Aitken, J. R. (1961). Performance of laying hens subjected to restricted feeding during rearing and laying period. Poultry Science 40, 345–354.Google Scholar
Waring, J. J. & Brown, W. O. (1967). Calorimetric studies in the utilization studies of dietary energy by the laying White Leghorn hen in relation to plane of nutrition and environmental temperature. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 68, 149–155.Google Scholar