Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T11:49:30.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fertilizer utilization studies in cotton using 15N and 32P labeled fertilizers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

V. Skarlou ,
E. Papanicolaou ,
C. Nobeli  and
N. Katranis
V. Skarlou
Affiliation:
Nuclear Reseearch Center ‘Democitos’, Department of Soils and Plant Nutrition Aghia Paraskevi, Attiki, Greece
E. Papanicolaou
Affiliation:
Nuclear Reseearch Center ‘Democitos’, Department of Soils and Plant Nutrition Aghia Paraskevi, Attiki, Greece
C. Nobeli
Affiliation:
Nuclear Reseearch Center ‘Democitos’, Department of Soils and Plant Nutrition Aghia Paraskevi, Attiki, Greece
N. Katranis
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Station, Vardates Fthiotis, Greece
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two field experiments with cotton were conducted over two growing seasons on calcareous, heavy to medium textured, alluvial soils, to study the influence of N and P fertilizer rates, the method of fertilizer placement and the time of N fertilizer application on cotton yield, product quality and fertilizer utilization.

Nitrogen application up to 50 kg/ha in the first experiment and up to 120 kg/ha in the second experiment increased seed cotton yield; higher nitrogen rates in the first experiment had an adverse effect on seed production due to abnormal rainfall which caused an intense vegetative growth and delayed the time of maturity.

Split application of N at sowing and at early flowering was slightly superior to a single application at sowing or to split applications at sowing, early flowering and initiation of fruiting. Addition of nitrogen during the flowering stage failed to influence cotton production significantly.

Banding P and N fertilizers increased plant height significantly, compared with the broadcasting method; placement methods, however, did not significantly affect seed yield.

Increasing amounts of N and P fertilizers had essentially no effect on lint quality.

The phosphate concentrations in the tops derived from fertilizer phosphate, were low ranging from 1–2 to 2–4 % of the P concentration in the tops and it was not affected by the different treatments.

The utilization coefficients of the nitrogen fertilizer sources by cotton were high, nitrate N being utilized much more efficiently than ammonium N.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 93 , Issue 2 , October 1979 , pp. 371 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ameb, F. & Abuamin, H. (1969). Evaluation of cotton response to rates, sources and timing of nitrogen application by petiole analysis. Agronomy Journal 61, 635–637.Google Scholar
Argybiadis, G. A. & Polyzopoulos, N. A. (1977). Foliar diagnosis on ootton in Macedonia. Experimental Agriculture 13, 395–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Btjbhan, H. O. (1972). Post sowing application of fertilizer nitrogen to cotton in Sudan Gezira. Cotton Orowing Review 49, 216–223.Google Scholar
Heabn, A. B. (1975). Response of cotton to water and nitrogen in a tropical environment. I. Frequency of watering and application of nitrogen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 84, 407–417.Google Scholar
Gabdnee, B. B. & Tucker, T. C. (1967a). Nitrogen effects on cotton. I. Vegetative and fruiting characteristics. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 31, 780–785.Google Scholar
Gabdneb, B. R. & Tuckeb, T. C. (1967b). Nitrogen effects on ootton. II. Soil and petiole analyses. Soil Science Society of. dmenca. Proceedwig's 31, 785–791.Google Scholar
Murray, J. C., Reed, R. M. & Oswalt, E. S. (1965). Effect Of fertilizer treatments on the fiber properties of cotton. Agronomy Journal 57, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, M. N. & Bains, S. S. (1971). Studies on fertilization of some field crops by using radiotracer technique. In Radiation and Radioisotopes in Soil Studies and Plant Nutrition, pp. 291–299. Proceedings of a Symposium held at Hebbal, Bangalore.Google Scholar
Sinha, M. N. & Pandey, S. L. (1969). Investigation of the dose and method of phosphorus application to cotton. Indian Journal of Agronomy 14, 218–221.Google Scholar
Singh, C., Khan, M. S. & Katti, G. (1972). Timings of nitrogen application to rain-fed American cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in black cotton soils of Madhya Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 42, 307–313.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Singh, K. & Brar, K. S. (1973). The effect of time and the method of fertilizer application on cotton yield. Journal of Research, Punjab Agricultural Vniversity 10, 167–170.Google Scholar
Terman, G. L. & Hunt, C. M. (1964). Volatilization losses of nitrogen from surface applied fertilizers, as measured by crop response. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 28, 667–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velyswamy, P., Marappan, P. V. & Nabayanan, S. S. (1970). Response of irrigated Cambodia cotton to fractional application of nitrogen. Madras Agricultural Journal 57, 541–545.Google Scholar
Yassoglou, N., Afostolakis, C, Nobeli, C. & Dottka, C. (1968). Investigation of phosphorus fertilization problems of Greek soils by use of 88P labelled materials. N. R. C. ‘Democritos’ Edition. Soils and Plant Nutrition Laboratory. (Greek/English).Google Scholar