Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T08:36:40.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The growth of maize. I. The effect of plant density on yield of digestible dry matter and grain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. O. Adelana
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent
G. M. Milbourn
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent

Summary

Three maize hybrids (Kelvedon 75A, Kelvedon 33, and Anjou 210) were grown under irrigated conditions at a wide range of density from 5·4 to 21·6 seeds/m2 at a rectangularity of 1:1. For yield of digestible dry matter at the time of silage harvest (7 October) a seed rate of 10·8 seeds/m2 (44000/acre) appeared adequate, as doubling the density to 21·6/m2 only resulted in 7% higher yield. K 33, which is a late·maturing hybrid bred for silage in south-east England (50·5–52·5 °N) produced the highest total yield of digestible dry matter due to a high yield of digestible stem. However, the dry matter % of this material would be too low for good ensilage and for a high level of feed intake. In the early grain hybrid K 75 A, 62% of the digestible dry matter was contained in the ear at the silage stage which improved the digestibility and dry matter % of the whole crop with only a 12% lower yield than K 33.

The optimum density for grain was 10·8 seeds/m2. This is a higher response to density than is believed to occur in field crops in Britain as in these experiments the seed was planted on the square and irrigation was applied at moisture sensitive stages. The parabolic relationship between grain yield and density was closely related to grain number per unit area. At 10·8 seeds/m2 all three hybrids were of similar yield and grain number per unit area. In Anjou 210 this was achieved with one large ear per plant, whilst for the two Kelvedon hybrids mean ear production was 1·34/plant but with 27% fewer grains per ear.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bunting, E. S. (1966). Maize – an alternative fodder crop in Britain. Outl. Agric. 5, 104–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunting, E. S. & Willey, L. A. (1959). The cultivation of maize for fodder and ensilage. II. The effect of changes in plant density. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 52, 313–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dent, J. W. (1963). Digestibility tests on varieties of fodder crops in trial. J. natn. Inst. agric. Bot. 9, 395401.Google Scholar
Donald, C. M. (1963). Competition among crop and pasture plants. Adv. Agron. 15, 1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, R. (1960). Plant population and crop yield. Fid Crop Abstr. 13, 159.Google Scholar
Kieby, E. J. M. (1967). The effect of plant density upon the growth and yield of barley. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68, 317–24.Google Scholar
Milbourn, G. M. (1971). Maize for Grain: A Growers' Handbook, 2nd ed.London: Home-Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
Thomson, A. J. & Rogers, H. H. (1968). Yield and quality components in maize grown for silage. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 71, 393403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar