Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T20:17:11.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In vivo and in sacco digestibility and rumen microbial degradation of cell walls of soyabean and rape integuments and of dehydrated beet pulp in sheep, observed by scanning electron microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. Grenet  and
P. Barry
E. Grenet
Affiliation:
Station de Recherches sur la Nutrition des Herbivores, Unité de l'Ingestion, INRA, Centre de Recherches de Clermont-Ferrand-Theix, 63122 Ceyrat, France
P. Barry
Affiliation:
Station de Recherches sur la Nutrition des Herbivores, Unité de l'Ingestion, INRA, Centre de Recherches de Clermont-Ferrand-Theix, 63122 Ceyrat, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The in vivo digestibility of soyabean integuments, rape integuments and dehydrated beet pulp was determined in sheep in the Centre de Recherches de Clermont-Ferrand-Theix, in 1985. Organic matter digestibility was 83·5, 59·6 and 85·0%, respectively, for the three feeds. The nylon bag method was used to determine the disappearance of dry matter (DM) in the rumen. After 72 h, 89 and 96% DM had disappeared for soyabean integuments and beet pulp, respectively, but only 61% for rape integuments. The DM disappearance rate was slowest (P < 0·05) for soyabean integuments. Microscopic examination showed that the different layers of the soyabean integument could be ranked in increasing order of resistance to microbial degradation as follows: parenchyma, aleurone layer, column cell layer, palisade layer and epidermis. The hilum area was the most resistant and the only one lignified. The cell layers of the rape integument could be ranked in increasing order of resistance as follows: epidermis, aleurone layer and palisade layer. The last was highly lignified and not degradable. Degradation of beet pulp was fast, occurring first in the parenchyma. The vessels resisted degradation but were only a small part of the feed. This study shows why beet pulp has a low fill value and allows high intake. The soyabean integument is very digestible and is degraded slowly, whereas almost half of the rape integument is made up of a cell layer that is not degradable.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 115 , Issue 3 , December 1990 , pp. 429 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akin, D. E. & Barton, F. E. (1983). Rumen microbial attachment and degradation of plant cell walls. Federation Proceedings 42, 114–121.Google ScholarPubMed
Akin, D. E., Barton, F. E. & Coleman, S. W. (1983). Structural factors affecting leaf degradation of old world bluestem and weeping love grass. Journal of Animal Science 56, 1434–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artschwager, E. (1926). Anatomy of the vegetative organs of the sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Research 33, 143–176.Google Scholar
Carré, B. & Brillouet, J. M. (1986). Yield and composition of cell wall residues isolated from various feedstuffs used for non-ruminant farm animals. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 37, 341–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demarquilly, C. & Chenost, M. (1969). Etude de la digestion des fourrages dans le rumen par la methode des sachets de nylon; liaisons avec la valeur alimentaire. Annales de Zootechnie 18, 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demarquilly, C. & Weiss, P. (1970). Tableaux de la valeur alimentaire des fourrages verts. Etude S.E.I. No. 42. Versailles: Institut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueGoogle Scholar
Dop, P. & Gautié, A. (1928). Manuel de Technique Botanique. Paris: J. Lamarre.Google Scholar
Grenet, E. & Demarquilly, C. (1987). Rappels sur la digestion des fourrages dans le rumen (parois) et ses conséquences. In Les Fourrages Secs: Récolte, Traitement, Utilisation (Ed. Demarquilly, C.), pp. 141–162. Paris: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.Google Scholar
Grenet, E. & Barry, P. (1988). Colonization of thickwalled plant tissues by anaerobic fungi. Animal Feed Science and Technology 19, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillon, F. (1984). Dégradation en jus de rumen et analyse cytochimique de déchets lignocellulosiques. Mémoire de D.E.A. de Biologie et Physiologie Végétates appliquées aux Ressources Agricoles et Alimentaires. Nantes: Université de Nantes.Google Scholar
Jarrige, R. (1988). Alimentation des Bovins, Ovinset Caprins. Paris: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.Google Scholar
Johansen, D. A. (1940). Plant Microtechnique. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Juillet, A. (1955). Les Oléagineux et leurs Tourteaux. Paris: P. Lechevalier.Google Scholar
Langeron, M. (1949). Précis de Microscopie. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
ørskov, E. R. & McDonald, I. (1979). Estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thivend, P. (1981). Les constituants glucidiques des aliments concentrés et des sous-produits. In Prévision de la Valeur Nutritive des Aliments des Ruminants. Versailles: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.Google Scholar