Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-25T11:54:09.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The interaction between liming and forms of nitrogen fertilizer on established grassland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. N. Adams
S. N. Adams
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Chemistry Department, The Queen's University of Belfast and Department of Agriculture, Northern Irland, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Four factorial experiments made in 1982 and 1983 tested the effect of 10 t CaCO3/ha, applied either in autumn 1981 or spring 1982, on the response of established grassland to 360 kg N/ha per year applied either as ammonium sulphate, calcium nitrate, urea or a mixture of ammonium nitrate and calcium carbonate.

Lime did not increase yield in the short term. It also reduced herbage Mn and, to a lesser extent, herbage N, P and Mg. The mixture of ammonium nitrate and calcium carbonate gave about 0·5 t D.M./ha per year more herbage than did the other forms of N.

Lime had no effect on the recovery in the herbage of N from calcium nitrate, but it reduced N recovery from the other three fertilizers in 1982, and from urea also in 1983. Soil pH, which initially ranged from 4·9 to 5·7 at the four sites, was raised by lime to almost 7·0 in the top 5 cm soil. This pH is probably not high enough to cause serious losses due to NH3-volatilization.

Application of fertilizer prone to loss from NH3-volatilization is not recommended soon after liming. However, the practice is not likely to cause detectable yield loss in established grassland in Northern Ireland.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 106 , Issue 3 , June 1986 , pp. 509 - 513
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, S. N. (1973). The response of pastures in Northern Ireland to N, P and K fertilizers and to animal alurries. I. Effects on dry-matter yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 411–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, S. N. (1984). Some effects of lime, nitrogen and soluble and insoluble phosphate on the yield and mineral composition of established grassland. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 219–226.Google Scholar
Ferguson, R. B., Kissell, D. E., Koelliker, J. K. & Basel, W. (1984). Ammonia volatilization from surface-applied urea: effect of hydrogen ion buffering capacity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48, 578–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1981). The Analysis of Agricultural Materials. RB 427; London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1983). Lime and Fertiliser Recommendations. Booklet 2430; London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Morrison, J., Jackson, M. V. & Sparrow, P. F. (1980). The response of perennial ryegrass to fertiliser nitrogen in relation to climate and soil. Grassland Research Institute, Technical Report No. 27.Google Scholar
Murphy, W. R. (1978). Testing urea as a source of nitrogen. Farm and Food Research 9, 118–119.Google Scholar
Stumpe, J. M., Vlek, P. L. G. & Lindsay, W. L. (1984). Ammonia volatilization from urea and urea phosphates in calcareous soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48, 921–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Burg, P. F. J., Dilz, K. & Prins, W. N. (1982). Agricultural value of various nitrogen fertilizers. Technical Bulletin No. 13; Netherlands Nitrogen Bureau.Google Scholar
Volk, G. M. (1961). Gaseous losses of ammonia from surface-applied nitrogenous fertilizers. Agricultural and Food Chemistry 9, 280–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar