Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-29T13:55:09.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intravaginal oestradiol-progestagen treatments in the induction of early breeding in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

I. Gordon
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University College, Dublin

Summary

Six hundred and sixty-two sheep in twenty-two farm flocks were treated in June/July (period of late anoestrus) with intravaginal sponges impregnated with 30 mg ‘Cronolone’ (9α-fluoro-11β-hydroxy-17α-acetoxy-progesterone; G. D. Searle) or ‘Cronolone’ plus 400 mg progesterone and incorporating doses of 0-800 μg oestradiol-17β. Treatment was for 12 days; a single dose of 500 i.u. PMS (Burrough's Wellcome) was injected at pessary withdrawal. Seventy rams were joined to breed the ewes at first and second heats.

Oestradiol treatment resulted in a significantly higher incidence of sponge loss, a lower mating response, a lower conception rate and a lower number of lambs/conception. There was also a tendency for onset of oestrus to be delayed. Such effects were confined to first services and were much less evident in sheep receiving doses of 50 μg oestradiol or below. Data indicate that an intravaginal treatment for the induction of early breeding should consist of progestagen alone rather than progestagen in combination with oestradiol. The addition of 400 mg progesterone to the ‘Cronolone’ sponges appeared to reduce the adverse oestrogenic effects. Sheep treated with ‘Cronolone’/progesterone pessaries in the absence of oestradiol showed a mating response of 97%, a conception rate of 64% and 1·7 lambs/conception at the controlled oestrus.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gordon, I. (1958). Studies in the extra-seasonal production of lambs. J. agric Sci., Gamb. 50, 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, I. (1963). The induction of pregnancy in the anoestrous ewe by hormonal therapy. J. agric. Sci., Gamb. 60, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, I. (1971). Induction of early breeding in sheep by standard and modified progestagen-PMS treatments. J. agric Sci., Gamb. 76, 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, I. & Keane, M. G. (1967). Hormonal induction of early breeding in sheep. Ir. vet. J. 21, 122.Google Scholar
Gordon, I., Caffrey, W. & Morrin, P. (1969). Induction of early breeding in sheep following treatment with progestagen impregnated pessaries and PMS. J. Dept. Agric. Republ. Ire. 66, 212.Google Scholar
Robinson, T.J. (1965). Use of progestagen-impregnated sponges inserted intravaginally or subcutaneously for the control of the oestrous cycle in the sheep. Nature, Lond. 206, 39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, T. J. (1968). Synchronisation of the oestrous cycle and fertility. Proc. 6th int. Congr. Anim. Reprod. A. I. (Paris) 2, 1347.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. J. & Moore, N. W. (1967). The evaluation of progesterone and SC-9880 impregnated intravaginal sponges for the synchronisation of oestrus for large scale A.I. of Merino ewes in Spring. In Control of the Ovarian Cycle in the Sheep, Ed. Robinson, T. J.. Sydney University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, R. V., McDonald, M. F. & Rowson, L. E. (1963). Steroids in the ovarian blood of ewes before and after gonadotrophic stimulation. J. Endocr. 26, 155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed