Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:37:59.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mean velocity and velocity distributions of normal bull spermatozoa at different hydrogen-ion concentrations, derived from photo-electric measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. van Duijn  and
R. Rikmenspoel
C. van Duijn
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Animal Husbandry ‘Schoonoord’, Hoogt 10, Utrecht, Netherlands
R. Rikmenspoel
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Animal Husbandry ‘Schoonoord’, Hoogt 10, Utrecht, Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The mean velocity ῡ and the velocity frequency distribution f(υ) of bull spermatozoa with normal motility have been determined in standardized eggyolk—citrate buffers at different pH values, ranging frompH 5·70 to 8·35.

Under assumed approximately anaerobic conditions at37·0 ± 0·1° C. the mean velocity was found to show a straight-line relationship -with pH in the physiological region pH 5·70–7·50, according to the general equation

Statistically, k was shown to be a linear function of a, namely,

Consequently, the dependence of the mean velocity of the spermatozoa from any ejaculate can be characterized by the one parameter a = dῡ/dpH. (dimension μ/sec./pH), determining the slope of the ῡ υs. pH curve.

The mean velocity of all individual spermatozoa (measurements of all ejaculates at the same pH value pooled together) could be described accurately by the equation:

For some ejaculates the linear relationship was found to hold up to pH 8·00.

2. The velocity frequency distribution curves were found to change with pH. At pH 5·70 the curves are skew with a relatively high top value. At increasing pH values both the top value and skewness decrease. The mean standard deviation of the velocity distribution f(υ) was found to be proportional to pH and could be described by the equation

This means that the variability in swimming speeds of the individual spermatozoa of any ejaculate increases proportionally with pH, indicating a strain effect of increasing alkalinity on the population, irrespective of the general stimulation of motility in the region up to pH 7·50.

3. At each pH value the mean velocity decreases with time. Under assumed approximately anaerobic conditions at 37° C. the speed of velocity decrease as a function of pH was found to differ so much between different ejaculates that no generalization could be derived from the available material. The same holds for the effect of pH on the number of normally moving spermatozoa in the diluted ejaculate.

4. The total number of spermatozoa moving normally depends on pH, but the optimum varies with the individual ejaculates.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , June 1960 , pp. 300 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. (1942). J. Agric. Sci. 32, 298.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, A. W. & Emmens, C. W. (1951). J. Physiol. 114, 16.Google Scholar
Davis, H. P., Trimberger, G. W. & Underbjerg, G. K. L. (1940). J. Dairy Sci. 23, 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, H. P., Underbjerg, G. K. L. & Williams, N. K. (1940). J. Dairy Sci. 23, 1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, H. P. & Williams, N. K. (1939). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 32nd Ann. Meet., p. 232.Google Scholar
Groot, B. De (1958). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Henle, G. & Zittle, C. A. (1942). Amer. J. Physiol. 136, 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JrKinney, W. C. & Salisbury, G. W. (1953). J. Dairy Sci. 36, 578.Google Scholar
Lardy, H. A. & Phillips, P. H. (1943). Amer. J. Physiol. 138, 741.Google Scholar
Norman, C., Johnson, C. E., Porterfield, I. D. & JrDunbar, R. S. (1958). J. Dairy Sci. 41, 1803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickard, H. E., Ludwick, T. M., Hess, E. A. & Ely, F. (1957). J. Dairy Sci. 40, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rikmenspoel, R. (1957 a). Experientia, 13, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rikmenspoel, R. (1957 b). Photoelectric and cinematographic measurements of the ‘motility’ of bull sperm cells. Thesis, Utrecht, Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rikmenspoel, R. & Van Herpen, G. (1957). Phys. Med. Biol. 2, 54.Google Scholar
Romijn, C. (1950). Biol. Abstr. (Sect. F) 24, 10.Google Scholar
Schwabe, C. (1953). Fortschritte der pH-Messtechnik. Berlin.Google Scholar