Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T17:22:04.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Meiotic irregularities in hexaploid oats IV. Hybrids between Avena sativa (spring and winter varieties) A. fatua, A. sterilis, A. byzantina and A. nuda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. B. Joshi
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, School of Agriculture, Cambridge
H. W. Howard
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, School of Agriculture, Cambridge

Extract

1. Pollen mother cells with irregularities of meiosis were rare in the parent species and varieties, being usually less than 0·5% and the highest found being only 1·57% in the variety Grey Winter.

2. F1A. fatua C.S. 473 (from Afghanistan) × Grey Winter had 33·5% of pollen mother cells with irregularities. On the other hand, the F1 hybrids of A. fatua (C.S. 46 (from Asia Minor) × both spring and winter varieties of A. sativa showed between 2·45 and 12·81% of irregular cells and were thus more regular than F1 spring variety of A. sativa × Grey Winter.

3. F1A. sterilis × spring and winter varieties of A. sativa showed between 5·56 and 6·67% of cells with irregularities of meiosis.

4. F1A. fatua C.S.46 × A. sterilis and F1A. nuda × A. sterilis had 5·65 and 7·60% of irregular cells respectively, but F1A. nuda × A.fatua C.S. 46 had 46·05%.

5. All F1 hybrids with A. byzantina as one parent had high frequencies of pollen mother cells (from 59·12 to 88·45%).

6. The commonest irregularity of meiosis was the occurrence of univalents. Multivalents were found at a high frequency only in the A. byzantina hybrids. Bridges and fragments were uncommon, occurring in not more than 2% of cells.

7. The limitations of the cytological results in assessing the relationships between the different hexaploid species of oats are discussed. It would, however, appear that there is a close relationship between A. sativa (both spring and winter varieties), A.fatua (C.S. 46) and A. sterilis, but that A. byzantina is not closely related to that group.

8. The importance of the results to the plant breeder is briefly indicated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Åkerman, A. & Hagberg, A. (1954). Hereditas, Lund, 40, 438.Google Scholar
Coffman, F. A. (1946). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 38, 983.Google Scholar
Coffman, F. A. (1954). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 46, 432.Google Scholar
Coffman, F. A., Parker, J. H. & Quisenberry, K. S. (1925). J. Agric. Res. 30, 1.Google Scholar
Darlington, C. D. (1937). Recent Advances in Cytology, 2nd ed.London: J. and A. Churchill Ltd.Google Scholar
Etheridge, W. C. (1916). Mem. Cornell Agric. Exp. Sta. 10, 85.Google Scholar
Florell, V. H. (1931). J. Agric. Res. 43, 365.Google Scholar
Frankel, O. H. (1949 a). Heredity, 3, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, O. H. (1949 b). Heredity, 3, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haussknecht, C. (1885). Mitt, geogr. Ges. Jena, 3, 231.Google Scholar
Howard, H. W. (1947). J. Agric. Sci. 37, 139.Google Scholar
Howard, H. W. (1948). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 332.Google Scholar
Hunter, H. & Carson, G. P. (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 119.Google Scholar
Joshi, A. B. (1950). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Joshi, A. B. & Howard, H. W. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 45, 380.Google Scholar
Malzew, A. I. (1930). Bull. Appl. Bot., Leningrad, 38, suppl. (English translation, p. 473).Google Scholar
Marquand, C. V. B. (1922). Bull. Welsh Pl. Breed. Sta. Ser. C, no. 2.Google Scholar
Nishiyama, I. (1929). Jap. J. Genet. 5, 1.Google Scholar
Sears, E. R. (1953). Amer. Nat. 87, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thellung, von A. (1912). Vjschr. naturb. Oes. Zürich, 56, 293.Google Scholar
Trabut, L. (1914). J. Hered. 5, 56.Google Scholar