Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T21:55:34.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Milk production in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. S. Falconer
D. S. Falconer
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Lactation was studied quantitatively in a heterogeneous stock of laboratory mice, in order to find out whether the milk production of mice could be satisfactorily evaluated from measurements of the growth of the young; and, if individual differences were proved to be readily detectable, to find out to what extent these differences were heritable.

2. The total weight of the litter suckled, at 12 days of age, was found to provide a convenient measure of milk production.

3. Since the amount of milk given by a mouse is greatly influenced by the number of young suckled, allowance for differences of litter size was made by means of an index of performance which expressed the amount of milk given by a mouse at a particular lactation as a percentage of the average amount given to litters of that size. The index of performance thus evaluated the response of the mouse to a standard stimulus and gave no indication of the maximum productivity of the mouse.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , July 1947 , pp. 224 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth. New York.Google Scholar
Brody, S. & Nisbet, R. (1938). A comparison of the amounts and energetic efficiencies of milk production in rat and dairy cow. Res. Bull. Mo. A.gric. Exp. Sta. no. 285.Google Scholar
Cowie, A. T. & Folley, S. J. (1947). The measurement of lactational performance in the rat in studies of endocrine control of lactation. J. Endocrinol. 5, 9–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crozier, W. J. & Enzmann, E. V. (1935). On the relation between litter size, birth weight, and rate of growth in mice. J. Gen. Physiol. 19, 249–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enzmann, E. V. (1933). Milk production curve of albino mice. Anat. Rec. 56, 345–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 52, 399–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDowell, E. C., Gates, W. H. & MacDowell, C. G. (1930). The influence of the quantity of nutrition upon the growth of the suckling mouse. J. Gen. Physiol. 13, 529–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkes, A. S. (1926). The growth of young mice according to size of litter. Ann. Appl. Biol. 13, 374–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkes, A. S. (1929). Note on the growth of young mice suckled by rats. Ann. Appl. Biol. 16, 171–3.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. B. (1937). A statistical inquiry into the inheritance of milk-yield in three herds of dairy shorthorn cattle. J. Dairy Res. 8, 347–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. D. B. & Donald, H. P. (1937). Weaning weight of pigs and litter sampling with reference to litter size. J. Agric. Sci. 27, 485–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar