Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-26vmc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:33:19.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relative importance of some different sources of plant-weight variation in drilled and transplanted leeks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

L. R. Benjamin
L. R. Benjamin
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, CV35 9EF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In six experiments the effects of various factors on plant-weight variation (sum of squares of deviation from the mean shoot weight) at harvest were examined. These factors were seed size, sowing depth, time of seedling emergence, size at different stages of development, within-row spacing, density and row position within a bed.

In a drilled experiment, up to 25% of the variation in mature leek size could be attributed to variation in time of seedling emergence. Similarly, in the experiments which used transplants, 15% of the variation in the mature crop could be associated with variation in size shortly after seedling emergence from peat blocks.

Variation in row position within a 4-row bed never accounted for more than 11% of the weight variation at harvest, and variation in within-row spacing never accounted for more than 4% of weight variation. However, the coefficient of variation (c.v.) of leeks growing at 22 plants/m2 was 44% whereas the c.v. of those growing at 50 plants/m2 was 61%.

Using large seeds or sowing deeply gave a quicker emergence and a higher percentage emergence than using small seeds or sowing shallowly. However, these factors each never accounted for more than 7% of the weight variation in mature leeks.

Most of the plant-weight variation could not be attributed to any of the measured factors in any of the experiments. The c.v. of leeks which had emerged on a specific day and had been grown in a uniform environment, was between 50 and 66%, which was similar to the c.v.s observed in the transplant and drilled experiments. However, selecting for large transplants reduced the c.v. to 28% in one experiment; this effect was only partly attributable to the greater mean plant size resulting from this treatment.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 103 , Issue 3 , December 1984 , pp. 527 - 537
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, R. B. & Longden, P. C. (1967). Some effects of seed size and maturity on the yield of carrot crops. Journal of Horticultural Science 42, 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, L. R. (1982). Some effects of differing times of seedling emergence, population density and seed size on root-size variation in carrot populations. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 98, 637–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, L. R. (1984). The relative importance of some sources of root-weight variation in a carrot crop. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berninger, E. & Buret, P. (1967). Study of chlorophyll deficiencies in two cultivated species of the genus Allium: onion A. cepa L. and leek A. porrum L. Annales de l' amélioration des plantes 17, 175–194.Google Scholar
Black, J. N. (1956). The influence of seed size and depth of sowing on pre-emergence and early vegetative growth of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 7, 98–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. N. (1958). Competition between plants of different initial seed sizes in swards of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterranean L.) with particular reference of leaf area and light-microclimate. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. N. & Wilkinson, G. N. (1963). The role of time of emergence in determining the growth of individual plants in swards of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 628–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnet, B. (1976). The leek (Allium porrum L.): botanical and agronomic aspects. Review of literature. Saussurea 7, 121–155.Google Scholar
Brewster, J. L. & Salter, P. J. (1981). A comparison of the effects of regular versus random within-row spacing on the yield and uniformity of size of springsown bulb onions. Journal of Horticultural Science 55, 235–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dragland, S. (1972). Germination of leek seed at different temperatures. Meldinger fra norges landbrukshogskole 51, 1–9.Google Scholar
Gelmond, H. (1965). Pretreatment of leek seed as a means of overcoming superoptimal temperatures of germination. Proceedings of the International Seed Testing Association 30, 737–742.Google Scholar
Gray, D. (1976). The effect of time to emergence on head weight and variation in head weight at maturity in lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Annals of Applied Biology 82, 569–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerton, J. L. (1961). Studies of the effects of soil aggregate size on the emergence and growth of beet (Beta vulgaris L.). I. Seedling emergence. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 56, 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haworth, F. (1961). The yield of leeks as affected byspacing and size of transplant. National Vegetable Research Station Report for 1960, pp. 26–27.Google Scholar
Heydecker, W. (1956). Establishment of seedlings in the field. I. Influence of sowing depth on seedling emergence. Journal of Horticultural Science 31, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, M. L. & McFadden, A. D. (1960). The competitive interaction between barley plants grown from large and small seeds. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 40, 623–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneebone, W. R. & Cremer, C. L. (1955). The relationship of seed size to seedling vigor in some native grass species. Agronomy Journal 47, 472–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolev, N. (1970). Mechanised cluster cultivation of leek for human consumption. Horticultural and Viticultural Sciences 7, 41–44.Google Scholar
Lang, R. W. & Holmes, J. C. (1964). The growth of the swede crop in relation to seed size. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 63, 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovato, A. & Amaducci, M. T. (1965). Examination of the problem of whether dormancy exists in seeds of onion (Allium cepa L.) and leek (Allium porrum L.). II. Effects of temperature, prechilling and light on germination. Proceedings of the International Seed Testing Association 30, 803–820.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1979). Leeks. Booklet2069.Google Scholar
Nuttall, W. F. (1982). The effect of seeding depth, soil moisture regime, and crust strength on emergence of rape cultivars. Agronomy Journal 74, 1018–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M. A. & Harper, J. L. (1972). Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment. Journal of Ecology 60, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, H. A. & Hegarty, T. W. (1979). Sensitivity of seed germination and seedling radicle growth to moisture stress in some vegetable crop species. Annals of Botany 43, 241–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, P. J., Currah, I. E. & Fellows, J. R. (1980). Further studies on the effects of plant density, spatial arrangement and time of harvest on yield and root size in carrots. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 465–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, P. J., Currah, I. E. & Fellows, J. R. (1981). Studies on some sources of variation in carrot root weight. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 549–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweisguth, B. (1970). Preliminary studies for the improvement of leek Allium porrum. L. Proposal for a breeding method. Annales de l'amélioralion des plantes 20, 215–231.Google Scholar
Soetono, & Donald, C. M. (1980). Emergence, growth and dominance in drilled and square-planted barley crops. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 455–470.Google Scholar
Soetono, , & Puckridge, D. W. (1982). The effect of density and plant arrangement on the performance of individual plants in barley and wheat crops. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 33, 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, W. R. (1965). The effect of density on the performance of individual plants in subterranean clover swards. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 16, 541–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagenvoort, W. A. & Bierhuizen, J. F. (1977). Some aspects of seed germination in vegetables. II. The effect of temperature fluctuation, depth of sowing, seed size and cultivar, on heat sum and minimum temperature for germination. Scientia Horticulture 6, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, W. A. D. (1974). The soils of the National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne. National Vegetable Research Station Report for 1973, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. & Fellows, J. R. (1983). The effect of the time of seedling emergence of crisp lettuce on the time of maturity and head weight at maturity. Journal of Horticultural Science 58, 561–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar