Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T14:46:16.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response by sugar beet to various amounts and times of application of sodium chloride fertilizer in relation to soil type

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. P. Draycott  and
Susan M. Bugg
A. P. Draycott
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Susan M. Bugg
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two-thirds of the sugar-beet crop in the U.K. receives sodium chloride as part of the fertilizer programme. It is well known that the crop responds profitably on sandy soils which contain relatively little sodium and potassium, and most of these fields now receive sodium chloride. Few crops on clays, silts and organic soils are treated because the value of sodium chloride has never been clearly defined. Thus 36 field experiments were made over the 5 years 1975–9 on contrasting soil types testing five amounts of sodium chloride, 0, 100, 200, 400 and 800 kg/ha, and at two times, either autumn or spring. All the fields chosen were in continuous arable rotations where potassium chloride was applied regularly and nearly all the soils contained more than 120 mg exchangeable K/l.

Sodium chloride (400 kg/ha costing £12) increased sugar yield on average by about 0·2 t/ha (worth £40) on the mineral soils but no crop responded on organic soil. Exchangeable soil sodium concentration was not a good predictive test of which fields would respond but all the large increases in yield were on fields with less than 20 mg Na/1. A few crops responded on soils with 20–40 mg Na/1 but no crop responded on soil with more than 40 mg Na/1. A survey of sodium concentrations in 800 soils showed that most mineral soils contained less than 40 mg Na/1 so it is suggested that all mineral soils regardless of texture should receive 400 kg sodium chloride/ha. Crops on organic soils did not respond to sodium chloride because the soils already contained sufficient.

Autumn and spring applications of sodium chloride on mineral soils gave similar increases in yield provided the fertilizer was not applied just before sowing, when in 2 years it decreased plant establishment. This effect was particularly damaging on clays and silts where it is frequently difficult for other reasons to obtain good seed beds and full establishment. It is concluded that sodium-containing fertilizers should always be applied well ahead of sowing to allow rainfall and cultivations to incorporate them into the soil. On clays and silts it is suggested that they should be applied before ploughing to avoid soil compaction but on sands there may be advantages in post-ploughing application.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 98 , Issue 3 , June 1982 , pp. 579 - 592
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Draycott, A. P. & Durrant, M. J. (1971). Prediction of the fertilizer needs of sugar beet grown on fen peat soils. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 22, 295–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Durrant, M. J. (1976). Response by sugar beet to potassium and sodium fertilizers, particularly in relation to soils containing little exchangeable potassium. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Durrant, M. J., Davies, D. B. & Vaidyanathan, L. V. (1976). Sodium and potassium fertilizer in relation to soil physical properties and sugar-beet yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 633–642.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Marsh, J. A. P. & Tinker, P. B. H. (1970). Sodium and potassium relationships in sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 568–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, M. J., Draycott, A. P. & Boyd, D. A. (1974). The response of sugar beet to potassium and sodium fertilizers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 427–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggard, K. W. (1979). The effect of plant distribution on yield of sugar beet. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Sugar Beet Research and Education Committee (1980). Sugar Beet - a Grower's Guide, pp. 9–15.Google Scholar
Warren, R. G. & Johnston, A. E. (1962). Barnfield. Report of Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1961, pp. 227–247.Google Scholar