Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T02:26:37.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the behaviour of cattle and sheep in relation to the utilization of grass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. Pearson Hughes  and
D. Reid
G. Pearson Hughes
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Station, Stratford-on-Avon
D. Reid
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Station, Stratford-on-Avon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The importance of conducting studies on the behaviour of grazing animals has been stressed by several authors. Stapledon & Jones (1927) indicated the need for such work; while more recently Stapledon (1948, 1949) has made further reference to this need.

Adequate reviews of the work conducted prior to 1939 are to be found elsewhere (Castle, Foot & Halley, 1950; Tribe, 1950), and only the more important aspects need be considered here. The main weakness on the part of many of these earlier studies was that they were based on few observation periods, and that few animals were observed during each period. Many workers (Cory, 1927; Hodgson, 1933; Sheppard, 1921) carried out their observations during the daytime only, on the assumption that little or no grazing occurred after dark. In spite of this and the fact that the methods of study adopted varied considerably, some correlation exists between the results reported by the different workers.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , October 1951 , pp. 350 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkeson, F. W., Shaw, A. O. & Cave, H. W. (1942). J. Dairy Sci. 25, 779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, M. E., Foot, A. S. & Halley, R. J. (1950). J. Dairy Res. 17, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, J. L. (1951). Inst. Study Anim. Behaviour. 01. London (Unpublished).Google Scholar
Cory, V. L. (1927). Bull. Tex. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 154.Google Scholar
Doran, C. W. (1943). J. For. 41, 253.Google Scholar
Grassland Research Station (1950). Experiments in Progress, p. 60.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. (1950). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 18, 249.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. & Wallace, N. M. (1947). Rep. 7th Ann. Conf. N.Z. Soc. Animal Prod.Google Scholar
Hodgson, R. E. (1933). J. Agric. Res. 47, 417.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. Pearson & Harker, K. W. (1951). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone-Wallace, D. B. & Kennedy, W. K. (1944). J. Agric. Sci. 34, 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
N.Z. Dairy Prod. Exptr. (1948). 24, no. 2, p. 18.Google Scholar
Nicholls, J. E. (1944). Proc. Brit. Soc. Animal Prod. p. 66.Google Scholar
Rhoad, A. O. & Carr, R. B. (1945). Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. no. 890.Google Scholar
Scath, D. M. & Miller, C. D. (1947). J. Dairy Sci. 30, 921.Google Scholar
Schalk, A. F. & Amadon, R. S. (1928). Bull. N. Dak. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 216, p. 41.Google Scholar
Sheppard, J. H. (1921). Bull. N. Dak. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 154.Google Scholar
Stapledon, R. G. (1948). J. Minist. Agric. 55, 231.Google Scholar
Stapledon, R. G. (1949). J. Minist. Agric. 55, 461.Google Scholar
Stapledon, R. G. & Jones, M. G. (1927). Bull. Welsh P.B.S. Ser. H, no. 5, 42.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. L. (1951). Inst. Study Anim. Behaviour. 01 London (Unpublished).Google Scholar
Tribe, D. E. (1949). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 27, 106.Google Scholar
Tribe, D. E. (1950). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 6, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar