Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T21:56:43.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uptake efficiency of roots in plants at different ploidy levels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. Cacco ,
G. Ferrari  and
G. C. Lucci
G. Cacco
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural Chemistry, University of Padua, Italy
G. Ferrari
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural Chemistry, University of Padua, Italy
G. C. Lucci
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural Chemistry, University of Padua, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The uptake efficiency of roots for sulphate and potassium was evaluated in wheat, sugar beet, and tomato, at different ploidy levels. At increasing ploidy, wheat and sugar beet showed higher, tomato lower efficiency, the polyploid absorption system being characterized in sugar beet by higher Vmax and Km, in wheat by higher Vmax and unchanged Km, in tomato by lower Vmax and Km. Uptake efficiency of roots appears tightly bound to the evolutionary progress, that is to the level of environment adaptation of plants, and should be susceptible of further improvement by breeding practices.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 87 , Issue 3 , December 1976 , pp. 585 - 589
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowen, J. E. (1973). Kinetics of Zn absorption by excised roots of two sugar cane clones. Plant and Soil 39, 125–9.Google Scholar
Clark, R. B. (1975). Different Mg efficiency in corn inbreds. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 39, 488–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, D. T. (1974). Ion Transport and Cell Structure in Plants, pp. 290–301. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Crowley, P. H. (1975). Natural selection and the Michaelis constant. Journal of Theoretical Biology 50, 461–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Maggio, A. P. & Lambrukos, J. (1974). Polyploidy and gene dosage effects on peroxidase activity in ferns. Biochemical Genetics 12, 429–40.Google Scholar
Epstein, E. (1961). The essential role of calcium in selective cation transport. Plant Physiology 36, 437–44.Google Scholar
Epstein, E. & Jefferies, R. C. (1964). Genetic basis of selective ion transport. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 15, 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, G. & Renosto, F. (1972). Comparative studies of the active transport by excised roots of inbred and hybrid maize. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 105–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hageman, R. H., Lang, E. R. & Dudley, J. E. (1967). A biochemical approach to corn breeding. Advances in Agronomy 19, 46–86.Google Scholar
Murray, B. G. & Williams, C. A. (1973). Synthesis of flavenoids in polyploids of Briza media. Nature 243, 87–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohki, K. & Ulrich, A. (1975). Potassium absorption by excised barley roots in relation to antecedent K, P, N and Ca nutrition. Crop Science 15, 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardee, A. B. & Palmer, L. M. (1972). Regulation of transport system. A mean of controlling metabolic rates. 27th Symposium Society Experimental Biology (Oxford), pp. 133–44.Google Scholar
Petterson, S. (1975). Ion uptake efficiency of sun flower roots. Physiologia Plantarum 34, 281–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, T. R. & De Wit, C. T. (1975). Photosyntate and nitrogen requirements for seed production by various crops. Science 189, 565–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soressi, G. P. (1969). The Genetics of Tomato, pp. 8–9. Bologna: Edagricole.Google Scholar
Spettoli, P., Cacco, G. & Ferrari, G. (1976). Comparative evaluation of the enzyme multiplicity in a diploid, triploid and tetraploid sugar beet variety. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 27 (in the Press).Google Scholar
Thoday, J. M. (1975). Non-darwinian evolution and biological progress. Nature 255, 675–8.Google Scholar