Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T09:29:07.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Age of the First Person Singular”: the Vocabulary of the Self in New England, 1780–1850

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

Louis P. Masur
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of History at the University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.

Extract

If we only considered how near and intimate is the subject of the study of the self, we might suppose that of all studies it would be the most easy. And since it carries us back to the object of our most lively affections, we might think it would be most agreeable, and that we should proceed to it by natural impulse. Yet it is precisely the contrary.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Susman, Warren, “‘Personality’ and the Making of Twentieth-Century Culture,” in Culture as History (New York: Pantheon, 1984), 272Google Scholar. Discussions that place the emergence of the individual in the twelfth century include Bynum, Caroline Walker, “Did the Twelfth Century Discover the Individual?” in Jesus as Mother (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982), 82109Google Scholar and Morris, Colin, The Discovery of the Individual: 1050–1200 (New York: Harper & Row, 1972).Google Scholar

2 Taylor, Charles, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989), 34Google Scholar. The literature on the self in Western thought and culture is vast. In addition to Taylor, consult Shweder, Richard A. and LeVine, Robert A., Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984)Google Scholar, Heller, Thomas C. et al. , (eds.), Reconstructing Individualism (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1986)Google Scholar and the special issue of Social Research entitled “Reflections on the Self,” 54 (Spring, 1987).Google Scholar

3 The best books in this genre have been eye-opening. They include Cawelti, John G., Apostles of the Self-Made Man (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965)Google Scholar, Bercovitch, Sacvan, The Puritan Origins of the American Self (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975)Google Scholar, Greven, Philip, The Protestant Temperament (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1977)Google Scholar, and Lasch, Christopher, The Culture of Narcissism (New York: Norton, 1978)Google Scholar. For a review of the sociological literature see Wilkinson, Rupert, The Pursuit of American Character (New York: Harper & Row, 1988)Google Scholar. For an example of a more recent approach to studies of selfhood see Lears, Jackson, “From Salvation to Self-Realization: Advertising and the Therapeutic Roots of the Consumer Culture, 1880–1930,” in Lears, and Fox, (eds.), The Culture of Consumption (New York: Pantheon, 1983), 138Google Scholar. Extremely influential in recent literary and cultural studies has been Greenblatt, Stephen, Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980).Google Scholar

4 Miller, Perry, “The Shaping of the American Character,” in Nature's Nation (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967), 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Miller's use of the word “identity” in 1954 came just at the moment when the word was becoming a staple of social science discourse. See Gleason, Philip, “Identifying Identity: A Semantic History,” Journal of American History, 69 (03, 1983), 910–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 On the importance of words see Williams, Raymond, Keywords (New York: Oxford University Press, 1976)Google Scholar, and Rodgers, Daniel T., Contested Truths (New York: Basic Books, 1987).Google Scholar

6 Whicher, Stephen E. et al. , (eds.), The Early Lectures of Ralph Waldo Emerson (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1959–73, 2, 174 (hereafter cited as EL).Google Scholar

7 Lieber, Francis, On Civil Liberty and Self-Government (Philadelphia: Lippincott, 3rd edition 1888), 247–48; 21Google Scholar; Jefferson, to Adams, , 12 01 1812Google Scholar, in Cappon, Lester (ed.), The Adams–Jefferson Correspondence (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1959), 2, 291Google Scholar; Madison, James to Jackson, John, 21 12 1821Google Scholar, quoted in McCoy, Drew R., The Last of the Fathers: James Madison and the Republican Legacy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 88.Google Scholar

8 Appleby, Joyce, “The Radical Double-Entendre in the Right to Self-Government,” in Margaret, and Jacob, James, The Origins of Anglo-American Radicalism (London: Allen and Unwin, 1984), 275–83Google Scholar; Stevens, quoted on 27Google Scholar; Jefferson, Thomas to Hartley, David, 2 07 1787Google Scholar in Boyd, Julian (ed.), The Papers of Thomas Jefferson (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1955), 11, 526Google Scholar. Also see Appleby's, Capitalism and A New Social Order: The Republican Vision of the 1790s (New York: New York University Press, 1984)Google Scholar, and Fliegelman, Jay, Prodigals and Pilgrims: The American Revolt Against Patriarchal Authority, 1750–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

9 [Graydon, Alexander], Memoirs of a Life Chiefly Passed in Pennsylvania, Within the Last Sixty Years (Edinburgh: Blackwood, 1822), 425Google Scholar; Lieber, , On Civil Liberty and Self-Government, 338Google Scholar; Ames, Seth (Ed.), Works of Fisher Ames (Boston: Little, Brown, 1854), 2, 359.Google Scholar

10 Fitzpatrick, John C. (ed.), The Writings of George Washington (Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1940), 34, 3.Google Scholar

11 The debate can be followed in The Debates and Proceedings of the Congress of the United States (Washington: Gales and Seaton, 1849)Google Scholar. For Burr, , see 794Google Scholar; for Fitzsimons, , 899; supporters' comments on 904 and 902.Google Scholar

12 Ibid., 910, 902, 900, 914. For reactions outside of Congress see Foner, Philip S. (ed.), The Democratic-Republican Societies, 1790–1800 (Westport: Greenwood Press, 1976).Google Scholar

13 Debates and Proceedings, 915, 921–32.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., 934–35. 943–44.

15 Letters of Mrs. Adams (Boston: Little, Brown, 1840), 1, 146151Google Scholar; Adams, John quoted in Watts, Steven, The Republic Reborn (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987), 33.Google Scholar

16 On Puritan self-denial see Bercovitch, , The Puritan Origins of the American SelfGoogle Scholar, and Greven, , The Protestant Temperament, 7486Google Scholar; Wood, Gordon, The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1969)Google Scholar; Brackenridge, Hugh Henry, Modern Chivalry (New York: American Book Company, 1937), 489Google Scholar. For acute readings of Modern Chivalry see Watts, , The Republic Reborn, 4258Google Scholar and Davidson, Cathy, Revolution and the Word (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), 173–79.Google Scholar

17 Elliot, Jonathan (ed.), Debate in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution (Washington: United States Congress, 1836), 3, 388Google Scholar; de Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America, (New York: Vintage Books, 1945), 2, 130–31.Google Scholar

18 Some recent attempts to move beyond the republican synthesis include Wood, Gordon, “Interests and Disinterestedness in the Making of the Constitution,” in Beeman, Richard et al. , Beyond the Confederation: Origins of the Constitution and American National Identity (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987), 69109Google Scholar; Kloppenberg, James, “The Virtues of Liberalism: Christianity, Republicanism and Ethics in Early American Political Discourse,” Journal of American History, 74 (1987), 933CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Shalhope, Robert E., The Roots of Democracy: American Thought and Culture 1760–1800 (Boston: Twayne, 1990)Google Scholar. For a penetrating discussion of these issues as they were worked out in another time and place see Hirschman, Albert O., The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before its Triumph (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

19 Mayer, J. P. (ed.), Journey to America (Westport: Greenwood Press, 1981 reprint), 218.Google Scholar

20 Channing, William Ellery, Discourses (Boston: C. Bowen, 1832), 167–96Google Scholar. For a superb discussion of New England Unitarianism see Howe, Daniel Walker, The Unitarian Conscience: Harvard Moral Philosophy, 1805–1861 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

21 Ella Herbert: or, Self-Denial (Boston: Crosby and Nichols, 1845), 16Google Scholar. Elaborating on Foucault's, Michel work, Herzlich, Claudine and Pierret, Janine have argued that “in the nineteenth century…the figure of the sick person crystallized existentially and socially, assuming its modern form,” Illness and Self in Society (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987), 29Google Scholar. Also see Baur, Susan, Hypochondria: Woeful Imaginings (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).Google Scholar

22 Harriet Lathrop quoted in Rabinowitz, Richard, The Spiritual Self in Everyday Life (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1989), 119Google Scholar; Theodore Dwight Weld quoted in Walters, Ronald, The Antislavery Appeal (Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1976), 79Google Scholar. Also see the English novelist Brunton's, MarySelf-Control, first published in 1811 (London: Pandora, 1986 reprint).Google Scholar

23 Webster, Daniel, An Address Delivered at the Laying of the Corner Stone of the Bunker Hill Monument (Boston: Cummings, Hilliard & Co., 1825), 39.Google Scholar

24 de Gérando, Marie Joseph, Self-Education (Boston: Carter and Hendee, 1830), 150; 70; 90; 95Google Scholar. In America, Gérando's work carried the byline Degérando. Elizabeth Peabody, at the time William Ellery Channing's secretary and a future member of the Transcendentalist circle, translated the work from the French.

25 Ibid., 226; 239.

26 On Franklin's creation of self see especially Seavey, Ormond, Becoming Benjamin Franklin: The Autobiography and the Life (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1988)Google Scholar. It is worth noting that the autobiography contains surprisingly few compound nouns beginning with “self.”

27 Channing, William Ellery, “Self-Culture,” in The Works of William E. Cbanning (Boston: J. Munroe, 1841), 2, 347411.Google Scholar

28 Ibid., 381.

29 Gilman, William H. et al. , (eds.), The Journals and Miscellaneous Notebooks of Ralph Waldo Emerson (Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960–1982), 3, 70Google Scholar (hereafter cited as JMN); Moore, George, Diary, Harvard University Archives; EL, 2, 174Google Scholar; EL, 2, 191206Google Scholar; EL, 2, 215Google Scholar. On the emergence of popular lecture circuits and Emerson's role in them see Scott, Donald, “The Popular Lecture and the Creation of a Public in Mid-Nineteenth-Century America,” Journal of American History, 66 (1980), 791809CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Cayton, Mary Kupiec, “The Making of an American Prophet: Emerson, His Audience, and the Rise of the Culture Industry in Nineteenth-Century America,” American Historical Review, 92 (1987), 597620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30 The starting point for historically grounded discussions of Emerson and the self is Cayton, Mary Kupiec, Emerson's Emergence: Self and Society in the Transformation of New England, 1800–1845 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1990)Google Scholar; EL, 3, 245–46Google Scholar; EL, 2, 151, 199, 332, 308.Google Scholar

31 Slater, Joseph et al. , (eds.), The Collected Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979), 2, 2751Google Scholar [hereafter cited as CW]. For especially suggestive readings of “Self-Reliance” see Leer, David van, Emerson's Epistemology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 100–42Google Scholar, Cavell, Stanley, “Being Odd, Getting Even: Threats to Individuality,”Google Scholar in Heller, et al. , Reconstructing Individualism, 278312Google Scholar, and Bercovitch, , The Puritan Origins, 174–86.Google Scholar

32 CW, 2, 34, 41, 29, 31–32.Google Scholar

33 The cultural tension between appearance and reality is explored in Halttunen, Karen, Confidence Men and Painted Women: A Study of Middle-Class Culture in America, 1830–1870 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982)Google Scholar; on the history of photography, particularly the daguerreotype, see Trachtenberg, Alan, Reading American Photographs (New York: Hill & Wang, 1989)Google Scholar, Orvell, Miles, The Real Thing: Imitation and Authenticity in American Culture, 1880–1940 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1989)Google Scholar, and Rudisill, Richard, Mirror Image: The Influence of the Daguerreotype on American Society (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1971).Google Scholar

34 Marcus Root (1864) quoted in Orvell, , The Real Thing, 89Google Scholar; Hawthorne, Nathaniel, The House of the Seven Gables (New York: Bantam Classic edition, 1988), 68Google Scholar; JMN, 8, 142.Google Scholar

35 See Trachtenberg, , Reading American Photographs, 3352.Google Scholar

36 JMN, 8, 115–16.Google Scholar

37 Slater, Joseph (ed.), The Correspondence of Emerson and Carlyle (New York: Columbia University Press, 1964), 400, 404Google Scholar; JMN, 9, 382.Google Scholar

38 Everett, Edward, Orations and Speeches (Boston: Little, Brown, 1865), 1, 104Google Scholar; Kateb, George, “Thinking About Human Extinction (II): Emerson and Whitman,” Raritan, 6 (Winter, 1987), 23.Google Scholar