Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:54:18.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Film Noir: The Politics of the Maladjusted Text

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

Richard Maltby
Richard Maltby
Affiliation:
Richard Maltby is Lecturer in Film in the School of English, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QH.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

How are we to situate a movie in history? By now there must be few practitioners of American Studies who would not acknowledge that the products of Hollywood provide a rich seam waiting to be mined by social and cultural historians. As in most mining projects, the difficulty lies in developing the equipment needed to extract the ore. To treat film as a source of cultural history is by no means as simple as that old-fashioned literary approach by which an author's biography could be interwoven with a summary political or social history. The cinema has no author whose individuality can be used to gloss over the absence of method in such a procedure. Or rather, any movie has such a plethora of authors that the attempt to establish evidence of authorial intent is bound to fail, as auteurist criticism has repeatedly demonstrated. The “authors” of an entertainment commodity are not simply its director, writer, producer and studio head of production. They include front office personnel, New York executives and the advertising staff, distributors and theatre managers who “author” the product at the point of its sale to the public. In any case, the historian concerned with popular rather than elite culture is at least as interested in reception as in production, and his or her sphere of interest must extend beyond the limits of the text and its intended meaning to a concern with context and with how the movie was received and understood by its primary audience.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , April 1984 , pp. 49 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, for example, Bergman, Andrew, We're in the Money: Depression America and its Films (New York University Press, 1971)Google Scholar; Dowdy, Andrew, The Films of the Fifties: The American State of Mind (New York: William Morrow, 1973)Google Scholar.

2 See Cahiers du Cinéma editors, “John Ford's Young Mr Lincoln,” Screen, 13, 3 (1972), 5–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Porfiro, Robert G., “No Way Out: Existential Motifs in the Film Noir,” Sight & Sound 45, 4 (1976), 212–17Google Scholar.

4 Johnston, Claire, “Double Indemnity,” in Kaplan, E. Ann, ed., Women in Film Noir (London: British Film Institute, 1978)Google Scholar.

5 See Karimi, Amir M., Towards a Definition of the American Film Noir: 1941–1949 (New York: Arno Press, 1976)Google Scholar; Shadoian, Jack, Dreams and Dead Ends: The American Gangster/Crime Film (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1977)Google Scholar; Durgnat, Raymond, “Paint It Black: The Family Tree of Film Noir,” Cinema (U.K.) 6/7 (1970)Google Scholar; Place, J. A. and Petersen, L. S., “Some Visual Motifs of Film Noir,” Film Comment 10, 1 (1974)Google Scholar; Schrader, Paul, “Notes on Film Noir,” Film Comment, 8, 1 (1972)Google Scholar.

6 “Feature-Length Films, 1944, 1945 and 1946,” Hollywood Quarterly, 2, 3 (1947), 306–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Ceplair, Larry and Englund, Steven, The Inquisition in Hollywood (New York, Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1980), p. 445Google Scholar.

8 Opening credits, The House on 92nd Street, Twentieth Century-Fox, prod. Louis de Rochemont, dir. Henry Hathaway, 1945.

9 Jones, Dorothy B., “The Hollywood War Film: 1942–1944,” Hollywood Quarterly, 1, 1, (1945), 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Maltby, Richard, “Made For Each Other: the Melodrama of Hollywood and the House Committee on Un-American Activities, 1947,” in Davies, Philip and Neve, Brian, eds., Cinema, Politics and Society in America (Manchester University Press, 1981), pp. 82–4Google Scholar.

11 Motion Picture Herald, 28 06 1947, p. 13Google Scholar.

12 Dawson, Anthony H., “Motion Picture Economics,” Hollywood Quarterly, 3, 3 (1948), 217–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Inglis, Ruth A., Freedom of the Movies: A Report on Self-Regulation from the Commission on Freedom of the Press (University of Chicago Press, 1947)Google Scholar.

14 Powdermaker, Hortense, Hollywood the Dream Factory: An Anthropologist Looks at Hollywood (Boston: Little, Brown, 1950)Google Scholar.

15 Wolfenstein, Martha and Leites, Nathan, Movies: A Psychological Study (Glencoe, Ill.; The Free Press, 1950)Google Scholar.

16 Lazarsfeld, Paul F., “Audience Research in the Movie Field,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 254 (1947), 160–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Rosen, Irwin C., “The Effect of the Motion Picture Gentleman's Agreement on Attitudes towards Jews,” The Journal of Psychology, 26 (1948), 525–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Raths, Louis E. and Trager, Frank N., “Public Opinion and Crossfire,” Journal of Educational Sociology, 21 (1948), 345–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 254 (11 1947)Google Scholar, hereafter referred to as Annals.

19 Ramsaye, Terry, “The Rise and Place of the Motion Picture,” Annals, p. 9Google Scholar.

20 See, for example, Kracauer, Siegfried, “Those Movies with a Message,” Harper's 196 (06 1948), 567–72Google Scholar; Kahn, Gordon, “One Psychological Moment, Please,” Atlantic Monthly 178, 4 (10 1946), 135–7Google Scholar; Houseman, John, Vogue, 15 01 1947Google Scholar.

21 Shurlock, Geoffrey, “The Motion Picture Production Code,” Annals, p. 145Google Scholar.

22 Fearing, Franklin, “Influence of the Movies on Attitudes and Behavior,” Annals, p. 71Google Scholar.

23 Quigley, Martin, “Importance of the Entertainment Film,” Annals, pp. 65–9Google Scholar.

24 Powdermaker, Hortense, “An Anthropologist Looks at the Movies,” Annals, p. 81Google Scholar.

25 Ibid.

26 Motion Picture Herald, 1 11 1947, p. 13Google Scholar.

27 Houseman, John, “Today's Hero: A Review,” Hollywood Quarterly, 2, 2 (1947), 163CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Houseman, John, Vogue, 15 01 1947Google Scholar, quoted in Asheim, Lester, “The Film and the Zeitgeist,” Hollywood Quarterly, 2, 4 (1947), 416CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Borde, Raymonde and Chaumeton, Etienne, Panorama du Film Noir Américain, 1941–1953 (Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1955)Google Scholar

30 Hirsch, Foster, The Dark Side of the Screen (New York: Barnes, 1981)Google Scholar.

31 Silver, Alain and Ward, Elizabeth, eds., Film Noir: An Encyclopedic Reference to the American Style (New York: The Overlook Press, 1979), p. 2Google Scholar.

32 Kracauer, Siegfried, From Caligari to Hitler: A Psychological History of the German Film (Princeton University Press, 1947), p. 6Google Scholar.

33 Motion Picture Herald, 22 11 1947, p. 3942Google Scholar. Jewell, Richard B. and Harbin, Vernon, The RKO Story (London: Octopus Books, 1982)Google Scholar.

34 Asheim, Lester, “The Film and the Zeitgeist,” Hollywood Quarterly, 2, 4 (1947), 415CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Ibid., p. 416.

36 Houseman, John, “Houseman Replies to Asheim,” Hollywood Quarterly, 3, 1, 89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Kracauer, , From Caligari to Hitler, p. 8Google Scholar.

38 Deming, Barbara, Running Away from myself: A Dream Portrait of America Drawn from the Films of the Forties (New York, Grossman Publishers, 1969)Google Scholar. (The book was written in 1950, and portions of it were published in the magazine City Lights, 1953–55.)

39 Tyler, Parker, Magic and Myth of the Movies (London, Secker & Warburg, 1971), p. 31Google Scholar.

40 Chamberlain, William Henry, “The American ‘Discovery’ of European Totalitarianism,” in Skotheim, Robert Allen and McGiffert, Michael, eds., American Social Thought: Sources and Interpretations (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley), 2, 318Google Scholar.

41 Gerth, Hans, “Public Opinion and Propaganda,” in Bensman, Joseph, Vidich, Arthur J. and Gerth, Nabuko, eds., Politics, Character and Culture: Perspectives from Hans Gerth (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1982), p. 63Google Scholar.

42 Jowett, Garth, Film; The Democratic Art (Boston: Little, Brown, 1976), p. 321Google Scholar.

43 “Hollywood in Uniform,” Fortune, 25 (04 1942), 92–5, 130–8Google Scholar. Lowe, Herman, “Washington Discovers Hollywood,” American Mercury (04 1945), pp. 407–14Google Scholar.

44 Maltby, Richard, Harmless Entertainment: Hollywood and the Ideology of Consensus (Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press, 1983), pp. 102–5Google Scholar.

45 Larsen, Cedric, “The Domestic Motion Picture Work of the Office of War Information,” Hollywood Quarterly, 3, 4 (1948), 434–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Hans Gerth, p. 66.

47 Wanger, Walter, “OWI and Motion Pictures,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 7, 1 (1943), 108CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Handel, Leo A., Hollywood Looks at its Audience: A Report of Film Audience Research (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1950)Google Scholar.

49 Gorer, Geoffrey, The Americans: A Study in National Character (London: The Cresset Press, 1948), p. 8Google Scholar.

50 Mead, Margaret, The American Character (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1944: originally published in the U.S.A. under the title And Keep Your Powder Dry, 1942)Google Scholar.

51 Ibid., p. 25.

52 Ibid., p. 53.

53 Ibid., p. 155.

54 Quoted in Polenberg, Richard, One Nation Divisible: Class, Race and Ethnicity in the United States since 1938 (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1980), p. 47Google Scholar.

55 Margaret Mead, p. 27.

56 Ibid., p. 126.

57 Geoffrey Gorer, p. 53.

58 Ibid., p. 56.

59 Ibid., p. 80.

60 See, for example, Grinker, Roy R. and Spiegel, John P., Men Under Stress (Blakiston, Philadelphia, 1945)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 See Strecker, Edward R., Their Mothers' Sons (New York: Lippincott, 1946)Google Scholar.

62 Manchester, William, The Glory and the Dream: A Narrative History of America, 1932–1972 (London: Michael Joseph, 1973), p. 425Google Scholar.

63 Motion Picture Herald, 12 July 1947, p. 27.

64 Maltby, Richard, Harmless Entertainment, p. 78Google Scholar.

65 Guback, Thomas, The International Film Industry: Western Europe and America since 1945 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1969), pp. 121–41Google Scholar.

66 Rosten, Leo C., “Movies and Propaganda,” Annals, p. 119Google Scholar.

67 Motion Picture Herald, 1 September 1945, p. 14.

68 Short, K. R. M., “Hollywood Fights Anti-Semitism,” in Short, K. R. M., ed., Feature Films as History (London: Croom Helm, 1981), p. 174Google Scholar.

69 Ibid., p. 173.

70 William Manchester, pp. 405–9.

71 Alain Silver and Elizabeth Ward, p. 73.

72 Pickard, Roy, The Oscar Movies from A–Z (London: Hamlyn, 1978), p. 55Google Scholar.

73 Joan Crawford's Best Actress Award in 1945 for her performance in Mildred Pierce might be regarded as an exception; it does not, however, fall strictly within the period I am discussing, and the movie's status as a film noir is at least debatable.

74 Skouras, Charles P., “The Exhibitor,” Annals, p. 29Google Scholar.

75 William Manchester, p. 426.

76 Riesman, David, The Lonely Crowd, A Study of the Changing American Character (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950), p. 87Google Scholar.

77 Kracauer, Siegfried, “Hollywood's Terror Films: Do They Reflect an American State of Mind?,” Commentary, 2 (1946), 132–6Google Scholar.

78 Pichel, Irving, “Areas of Silence,” Hollywood Quarterly, 3, 1 (1947), 52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

79 Polonsky, Abraham, “The Best Years of Our Lives: A Review,” Hollywood Quarterly, 2, 3 (1947), 260CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80 Kracauer, Siegfried, “Those Movies with a Message,” Harper's, 196 (06 1948), 567–72Google Scholar.

81 Ibid., p. 569.

82 Ibid., pp. 570–1.

83 Agee, James, review of Out of the Past, Time, 15 12 1947Google Scholar.

84 Siegfried Kracauer, “Those Movies with a Message,” p. 572.

85 Woelfel, Norman, “The American Mind and the Motion Picture,” Annals, p. 91Google Scholar.

86 Quoted in Shindler, Colin, Hollywood Goes to War: Films and American Society, 1939–1952 (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979), p. 127Google Scholar.

87 Gorer, Geoffrey, The Americans, p. 187Google Scholar.

88 Ibid., p. 95.

89 Ibid., p. 96.