No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Population Growth and Environment: Some Aspects of the Problem in the United States and the Response
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 January 2009
Extract
Population growth has been traditionally regarded with some satisfaction in the United States, being associated with economic and social benefits and rising standards of living. Population expansion has, inter alia, provided an increasing labour force, larger and more varied markets and a widening range of opportunity for individuals. By 1967, however, as the U.S. population officially passed the 200 million mark, reactions were becoming decidedly ambivalent. Expressions of pride and pleasure, and the anticipation of further economic growth were somewhat soured by the widely publicized views of conservationists and ‘environmentalists’ (a rather newer breed). The old attitude of mind in fact paid little heed to the problems accompanying large population expansion and rapid changes both in patterns of living and in geographical distribution. In the late 1950s and early 1960s, however, concern about these matters began to grow, and the assumed arrival of the 200 millionth American heralded a sizeable campaign concerned with the threat, so called, of ‘over-population’. Stewart Udall, then Secretary of the Interior, writing a Foreword to his Department's report ‘The Population Challenge’, stated flatly ‘The greatest threat to quality of living in this country is overpopulation’. He spoke of the challenge of a soaring population; the shrinking amount of space per head; the gathering storm of conflict on space allocation, on resource utilization and on the preservation of the quality of environment. The headings of various sections of that report – ‘A Rationed Tomorrow’; ‘So Much and No More’; ‘Planning for the Pinch’ – all reflect urgent concern about the size and rate of growth of U.S. population with its growing pressure on land and other resources.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972
References
1 Department of the Interior, Conservation Yearbook No. 2 (1966), p. 3.Google Scholar
2 Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 200 Million Americans (1967), p. 3.Google Scholar
3 Department of the Interior, Study of Strip and Surface Mining in Appalachia. An Interim Report (1966).
4 Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Consumer Income: Series P–60, No. 76, December 1970.
5 Merton, R. K., Social Theory and Social Structure (New York: The Free Press, 1968), pp. 190 and 191.Google Scholar
6 See Clawson, M. and Stewart, C. L., Land Use Information (Resources for the Future, 1965).Google Scholar
7 Clawson, M., Held, R. B., Stoddard, C. H., Land for the Future (Resources for the Future, 1960).Google Scholar
8 Dept. of Agriculture, Major Uses of Land and Water: for 1964, Agricultural Economic Report No. 149 (1968).
9 Clawson, M., Land for Americans (Rand McNally, 1965), p. 16.Google Scholar
10 Elazar, D. J., in Goldwin, R. A. (ed.), A Nation of Cities (McNally, 1968), pp. 104–5.Google Scholar
11 Lindsay, J., The City (The Bodley Head, 1970), ch. 2.Google Scholar
12 Pickard, J. P., ‘Future Growth of Major U.S. Urban Regions’, Urban Land, 26 (02 1967).Google Scholar
13 More recently, Federal funding for pollution control programmes has risen sharply, e.g. relevant budget authorizations rose from $862 millions in fiscal year 1969, to $1,520 in 1970 and $4,813 in 1971.
14 Davies, J. C., The Politics of Pollution (Pegasus, 1970), p. 99.Google Scholar
15 The Council was set up in January 1970, and transmitted its First Annual Report to Congress in August 1970.
16 A brief Interim Report Population Growth and America's Future was published in March 1971; and the main Report is expected in 1972.
17 Cooley, R. A. and Wandesforde-Smith, G., Congress and the Environment, University of Washington Press, 1970, p. 227.Google Scholar
18 See The Environment: A National Mission for the Seventies (The Editors of Fortune, 1971), ch. 13.
19 This article originated as a paper delivered to a Colloquium at the Institute of United States Studies in the University of London in 1971.