Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Kraus, Joe
2022.
The Encyclopedia of Contemporary American Fiction 1980–2020.
p.
1.
Article contents
Lorrie Moore CollectionWords Are All You Need: Speech Acts in Lorrie Moore's Anagrams
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 August 2012
Abstract
Indulgence in wordplay is a chief marker of Lorrie Moore's prose. No matter the voice or context, her protagonists find refuge in words' multiple meanings, as near-puns, near-anagrams, and other examples of wordplay are strewn throughout her tales. Her characters are often shaped by their language and their response to others' words more than by their responses to events, giving speech acts more import than actual actions. All storytelling can be viewed as a type of speech act between author and reader, but Moore's protagonists use speech acts as a respite from tension and interpersonal conflict, to the extent of using language to invent new characters, such as Georgianne and Eleanor in Anagrams. People in Moore's tales are rarely looking for the “right” – consoling, helpful – words; they instead use language as a bandage to cover the wounds of failing, or failed, relationships. Speech acts ultimately prove fruitless in holding off the inevitable, and her characters are almost always alone at the end of their stories, isolated by the repercussions of their own speech acts. Their facility with language is a consolation in, but often contributor to, their loneliness.
- Type
- Lorrie Moore Collection
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
References
1 Hewitt, Leah D., “Getting into the (Speech) Act: Autobiography as Theory and Performance,” SubStance: A Review of Theory and Literary Criticism, 16, 1 (1987), 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Myers, Victoria, “The Significant Fictivity of Maxine Hong Kingston's The Woman Warrior,” Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 9, 2 (1986), 116–17Google Scholar.
3 Austin, J. L., How to Do Things with Words (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962)Google Scholar; Fish, Stanley E., “How to Do Things with Austin and Searle: Speech Act Theory and Literary Criticism,” MLN, 91, 5 (1976), 983–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Miller, J. Hillis, Speech Acts in Literature (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar.
4 Pratt, Mary Louise, Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977), xv.Google Scholar
5 Barbara Lovenheim, telephone interview with Lorrie Moore, New York Times, 2 Nov. 1986, www.nytimes.com/books/98/09/20/specials/moore-anagrams.html, accessed Dec. 2010.
6 Moore, Lorrie, Anagrams (New York: Knopf, 1986)Google Scholar, 130, original emphasis, hereafter cited parenthetically in the text. See also Alison Kelly's discussion of homonym wordplay in the story “Charades,” wherein a character “creat[es] intriguing slippages in signification and break[s] down the flimsy barriers that distinguish one thing from another.” Kelly, Alison, “Enactment and Performance in Lorrie Moore's Fiction,” Amerikastudien, 55, 2 (2010), 217Google Scholar.
7 John Stewart, “J. L. Austin's Speech Act Analysis,” in Donald G. Douglas, ed., Philosophers on Rhetoric: Traditional and Emerging Views (Skokie, IL: National Textbook, 1973), 194.
8 John R. Searle, Ferenc Kiefer, and Manfred Bierwisch, “Introduction,” in Searle, Kiefer, and Bierwisch, eds., Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1980), viii.
9 Ibid, vii.
10 Ibid, vii.
11 Gaffney, Elizabeth, “Lorrie Moore: The Art of Fiction CLXVII,” Paris Review, 1 April 2001, 76Google Scholar.
12 Chodat, Robert, “Jokes, Fiction, and Lorrie Moore,” Twentieth Century Literature, 52, 1 (2006), 49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 Cohen, Ted, Jokes: Philosophical Thoughts on Joking Matters (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press), 1999, 44–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Chodat, 50.
14 Chodat, 50.
15 Lee, Don, “About Lorrie Moore,” Ploughshares, 24, 2–3 (1998), 224Google Scholar.
16 Lyden, Jacki, “Interview with Lorrie Moore,” NPR: All Things Considered, Washington, DC, 22 Nov. 1998Google Scholar.
17 Daniel Vanderveken and Susumu Kubo, “Introduction,” in Vanderveken and Kubo, eds., Essays in Speech Act Theory (Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing, 2001), 16.
18 Bosco, Francesca M. and Bucciarelli, Monica, “Simple and Complex Deceits and Ironies,” Journal of Pragmatics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language Studies, 40, 4 (2008), 586–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
19 See Grice, H. Paul, “Logic and Conversation,” Syntax and Semantics, 3 (1975), 41–58Google Scholar.
20 Hill, Carol, “Sestinas and Wisecracks,” New York Times, 2 Nov. 1986Google Scholar, www.nytimes.com/books/98/09/20/specials/moore-anagrams.html, accessed Dec. 2010.
21 Chodat, 43, 52.
22 Austin, How to Do Things, 101.
23 Gaffney, “Lorrie Moore,” 64.
- 1
- Cited by