Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T02:28:31.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chauvet and Anglican Sacramentology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2018

Michael Niebauer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay demonstrates how Louis-Marie Chauvet’s sacramental theology both coheres with the sacramentology of the Anglican divines and challenges the multitude of sacramental expressions within Anglicanism today. After giving a brief background to the sacramental controversies inherited by both Chauvet and Richard Hooker, the first section of this essay argues that key similarities exist between unitive Anglican sacramental concepts and core components of Louis-Marie Chauvet’s fundamental theology as outlined in his monograph Symbol and Sacrament. After demonstrating that, through these similarities, Chauvet’s theology should be seen as a fruitful conversation partner with Anglican sacramentology, the second section of the essay will focus on two concepts within Symbol and Sacrament (the Eucharist as stumbling block and ritual as symbolic rupture) that hold the potential to enrich sacramentology within Anglicanism today.

Keywords

AnglicanismLouis-Marie ChauvetThomas CranmerRichard Hookermetaphysicspostmodernismsacramentology
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Anglican Studies , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , May 2018 , pp. 50 - 65
Copyright
© The Journal of Anglican Studies Trust 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1.

The Revd Michael Niebauer is a Teaching Fellow in Theology at Duquesne University.

References

2. Abbott, Eric Symes and Geoffrey Francis Fisher of Lambeth, Catholicity: A Study in the Conflict of Christian Traditions in the West, Being a Report Presented to His Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury (London: Dacre Press, 1947), p. 49 Google Scholar.

3. Roughly the beginning of the Archbishopric of Thomas Cranmer in 1532 to the ratification of the 1662 Book of Common Prayer.

4. Lohfink, Gerhard, Does God Need the Church? Toward a Theology of the People of God (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1999), p. 220 Google Scholar.

5. Pretot, Patrick, ‘The Sacraments as “Celebrations of the Church”: Liturgy’s Impact on Sacramental Theology’, in Philippe Bordeyne and Bruce Morrill (eds.), Sacraments: Revelation of the Humanity of God: Engaging the Fundamental Theology of Louis-Marie Chauvet (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2008), p. 28 Google Scholar.

6. See Marion, Jean-Luc, God without Being: Hors-Texte (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991)Google Scholar, pp. 163-67.

7. Marion, God without Being, p. 227.

8. Boeve, Lieven, ‘Theology in a Postmodern Context and the Hermeneutical Project of Louis-Marie Chauvet’, in Philippe Bordeyne and Bruce Morrill (eds.), Sacraments: Revelation of the Humanity of God: Engaging the Fundamental Theology of Louis-Marie Chauvet (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2008), p. 12 Google Scholar.

9. O’Donovan, Oliver, On the Thirty Nine Articles: A Conversation with Tudor Christianity (Exeter: Latimer House; Oxford: Paternoster Press, 1986), p. 14 Google Scholar.

10. O’Donovan, On the Thirty Nine Articles, pp. 13-14.

11. Dix, Gregory, The Shape of the Liturgy (London: Dacre Press, 1945), p. 676 Google Scholar.

12. Cocksworth, Christopher, ‘Eucharistic Theology’, in Kenneth Stevenson (ed.), The Identity of Anglican Worship (Harrisburg, PA: Morehouse Publishing, 1991), p. 52 Google Scholar.

13. Hooker, Richard, Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, Book V (London: J.M. Dent & Sons, 1965), p. 320 Google Scholar.

14. Hooker, Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, p. 325.

15. Hooker, Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, p. 236.

16. Crockett, William, ‘Holy Communion’, in Stephen Sykes and John E. Booty (eds.), The Study of Anglicanism (Philadelphia, PA: SPCK/Fortress Press, 1988), p. 310 Google Scholar.

17. Chauvet, Louis-Marie, Symbol and Sacrament: A Sacramental Reinterpretation of Christian Existence (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1995), p. 112 Google Scholar.

18. Chauvet, Symbol and Sacrament, p. 116.

19. Chauvet, Symbol and Sacrament, p. 140.

20. Boeve, ‘Theology in a Postmodern Context’, p. 10.

21. Crockett, ‘Holy Communion’, p. 309.

22. Crockett, ‘Holy Communion’, p. 310.

23. Vince, Ronald, ‘Richard Hooker on the Eucharist: A Commentary on the Laws V.67’, ATR 89.3 (2007), pp. 421-42 (428) Google Scholar.

24. Vince, ‘Richard Hooker on the Eucharist’, p. 430.

25. Chauvet, Symbol and Sacrament, p. 43.

26. Chauvet, Symbol and Sacrament, p. 45.

27. Chauvet, Symbol and Sacrament, p. 45.

28. Chapman, Mark D., Anglicanism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press: 2006), p. 56 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29. Chapman, Anglicanism, p. 81.

30. Chapman, Anglicanism, p. 84.

31. While I believe Chauvet can be a helpful voice within Anglican sacramentology, issues regarding the divides within the global Anglican Communion as a whole are outside of the scope of this essay. However, two components of what follows may be of some help. First, the hope is that a focus on the sacraments as appropriated within the local congregation can be of some assistance for clergy regardless of their position amidst the Anglican divisions. Second, while Chauvet may not be able to aid in the totality of divisions within Anglicanism today, he can be of great help for those particular divisions that are predicated upon liturgical disagreement.

32. Boeve, ‘Theology in a Postmodern Context’, p. 8.

33. Pretot, ‘The Sacraments as “Celebrations of the Church”’, p. 35.

34. Such adoption is consistent with Roman Catholic theology, which recognizes no particular philosophical scheme as normative for the whole of theology.

35. Chauvet, Symbol and Sacrament, p. 331.

36. Chauvet, Symbol and Sacrament, p. 337.

37. Chauvet, Symbol and Sacrament, p. 339.

38. Chauvet, Symbol and Sacrament, p. 336.

39. Chauvet, Symbol and Sacrament, p. 336.

40. Douglas, Ian, ‘Inculturation and Anglican Worship’, in Charles C. Hefling and Cynthia L. Shattuck (eds.), The Oxford Guide to The Book of Common Prayer: A Worldwide Survey (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 274 Google Scholar.

41. Cocksworth, ‘Eucharistic Theology’, p. 65.