Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T03:31:57.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Series on Church and State Church and State in the Legal Tradition of Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Peter Young
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship between church and state in Australia has been examined on many occasions, though principally by historians and theologians. This article examines how the legislature and courts of Australia have handled problems where there has been a conflict at the interface between secular and religious interests. The article deals with constitutional issues, conflict in education, in town planning and taxation as well as considering what we really mean by ‘church’ and ‘state’ in this context and how problems might manifest themselves in the twenty-first century.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Anglican Studies , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , December 2003 , pp. 92 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © SAGE Publications (Los Angeles, London, New Delhi and Singapore) and The Journal of Anglican Studies Trust 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Morgan, E. S., Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1988).Google Scholar

2. Hon. Mr Justice McPherson, B. H. CBE, ‘The Church as Consensual Compact: Trust and Corporation’, ALJ 74 (2000), pp. 159–74 (159).Google Scholar

3. See Kaye, B.N., They Asked for a King (forthcoming), ch. 4.Google Scholar

4. Act 25 Hen VIII Ch 19 whereby no new church canons were to be passed without the king's assent.

5. Doe, N., Canon Law in the Anglican Communion: A Worldwide Perspective (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Letters on Toleration.

7. See Introduction to Root's Reports Vol 1 (Conn) (1789–1793)Google Scholar (repr. State of Connecticut, 1962), p. xi.

8. Wightman v Wightman (1820) 4Google Scholar Johnson Ch 314.

9. See Border, R., Church and State in Australia 1788–1872: A Constitutional Study of the Church of England in Australia (London: SPCK, 1962).Google Scholar

10. Bennett, J.M., Lives of the Australian Chief Justices–Sir Archibald Burt, Wolff (Western Australia) (Sydney: Federation Press, 2002).Google Scholar

11. See, e.g., Halsbury' Laws of England, Australian Supplement, ‘Ecclesiastical Law’, pp. 4–8Google Scholar, paras, C334, 340 and C345.

12. O'Farrell, P., The Catholic Church in Australia (Melbourne: Nelson, 1968), p. 1.Google Scholar

13. Keir, D. L., The Constitutional History of Modern Britain since 1485 (London: Black, 6th edn, 1960), p. 128.Google Scholar

14. Watson, F. and Chapman, P. (eds.), Historical Records of Australia (9 vols.; Sydney: Library Committee of the Commonwealth Parliament, 1914–1925, 1997), VIII, pp. 336–37.Google Scholar

15. See O'Farrel, , The Catholic Church in Australia, ch. 11.Google Scholar

16. Unreported, but available on Macquarie University's website (hhhp://www.law.mq.edu.au/scnsw).

17. The conflict between Governor Bourke and Bishop Broughton is too complex to be considered here. For details see Shaw, G., Patriarch and Patriot, William Grant Broughton 1788–1853 (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1978)Google Scholar, chs. 4 and following.

18. AG v Wylde (1948) 78 CLR 224, 289.Google Scholar

19. (1861) 2 Legge 1307.

20. (1861) 2 Legge 1307 at p. 1311.

21. (1861) 2 Legge 1307 at p. 1321.

22. (1861) 2 Legge 1307 at p. 1328.

23. The minutes are set out in Clark, H. L., Constitutional Church Government in the Dominions Beyond the Seas and in Other Parts of the Anglican Communion (London: SPCK, 1924), pp. 96–109.Google Scholar

24. 18 Vic No 45.

25. (1948) 78 CLR at pp. 285–86.

26. (1949) 78 CLR at p. 289.

27. (1863) 1 Moore (NS) 411, 460; 15 ER 756, 774.

28. Private Act 30 Victoria.

29. Private Act 1902 subsequently slightly amended by public Acts.

30. 59 Vic No 15.

31. 14 Vic No 31.

32. 43 Vic No 43.

33. [1976] 2 NSWLR 199.

34. Ely, R., Unto God and Caesar: Religious Issues in the Emerging Commonwealth 1891–1906 (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

35. Pannam, C.L., ‘Travelling Section 116 with a US Road Map’, MULR 4 (1963–1964), p. 41.Google Scholar

36. (1892) 143 US 457.

37. Pannam, , ‘Travelling Section 116’, p. 55.Google Scholar

38. Quick, J. and Garran, R.R., The Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth (Sydney: Legal Books, 1976 [1901]), p. 951.Google Scholar

39. Quick and Garran, , The Annotated Constitution, p. 962.Google Scholar

40. (1899) 175 US 291.

41. (1912) 15 CLR 366.

42. (1943) 67 CLR 116.

43. Cumbrae-Stewart, F.D., ALJ 20 (1946), pp. 207–12.Google Scholar

44. (1943) 319 US 105.

45. Attorney-General (Vic), Ex Parte Black v Commonwealth (1981) 146 CLR 559.Google Scholar

46. The Church of the New Faith v Commissioner of Payroll Tax (Vic) (1983) 153 CLR 120.Google Scholar

47. Reynolds v United States (1878) 98 US 145,163.Google Scholar

48. Evans, B.N., Interpreting the Free Exercise of Religion (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997), p. 206.Google Scholar

49. (1992) 27 NSWLR 483.

50. McPherson, , ‘The Church as Consensual Compact’, p. 171.Google Scholar

51. (2000) 48 NSWLR 498.

52. (1989) 37 NSWLR 293, on appeal (1989) 18 NSWLR 291 (CA).

53. SC Vic Byrne J, 27 October 1997, unreported.

54. (2001) 52 NSWLR 641.

55. Churches, Clergy and the Law (Sydney: Federation Press, 1996).Google Scholar

56. (1987) 10 NSWLR 352.

57. See, e.g., Queensland anti-discrimination legislation.

58. ‘Thoughts on Secularity and Friendship Outside a Cathedral’, 2003. A private paper.Google Scholar