Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T22:20:55.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of a class of second-order density functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

C. B. Mehr
C. B. Mehr*
Affiliation:
Ohio University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Distributions of some random variables have been characterized by independence of certain functions of these random variables. For example, let X and Y be two independent and identically distributed random variables having the gamma distribution. Laha showed that U = X + Y and V = X | Y are also independent random variables. Lukacs showed that U and V are independently distributed if, and only if, X and Y have the gamma distribution. Ferguson characterized the exponential distribution in terms of the independence of X – Y and min (X, Y). The best-known of these characterizations is that first proved by Kac which states that if random variables X and Y are independent, then X + Y and X – Y are independent if, and only if, X and Y are jointly Gaussian with the same variance. In this paper, Kac's hypotheses have been somewhat modified. In so doing, we obtain a larger class of distributions which we shall call class λ1. A subclass λ0 of λ1 enjoys many nice properties of the Gaussian distribution, in particular, in non-linear filtering.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , November 1967 , pp. 123 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Laha, R. G. (1954) On a characterization of the gamma distribution. Ann. Math. Statist. 25, 784–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Lukacs, E. (1955) A characterization of the gamma distribution. Ann. Math. Statist. 26, 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Ferguson, T. S. (1964) A characterization of the exponential distribution. Ann. Math. Statist. 35, 1199–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Kac, M. (1939) On a characterization of the normal distribution. Amer. J. Math. 6, 726–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Vershik, A. M. (1964) Some characteristic properties of Gaussian stochastic processes. Theor. Probability Appl. (English translation) IX, 353–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Rice, S. O. (1944) Mathematical analysis of random noise. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 23, 282–332; 24, 48–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Mcfadden, J. A. (1966) A diagonal expansion in Gegenbauer polynomials for a class of second-order probability densities SIAM J. Appl. Math. 14, No. 6, 1433–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Barrett, J. F. and Lampard, D. G. (1955) An expansion for some second-order distributions and its application to noise problems. IRE Trans. Information Theory IT-1, 10–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Mehr, C. B. (1964) A class of wide-sense Markov processes. IBM Research Note NJ-66.Google Scholar
[10] Mehr, C. B. (1965) Optimum non-linear filters. IBM Research Report RJ-353.Google Scholar
[11] Nuttall, A. H. (1958) Theory and application of the separable class of random processes. Tech. Report 343, RL–E. M.I.T.Google Scholar