Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-16T19:45:09.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Gini index of random trees with an application to caterpillars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2017

Hrishikesh Balaji*
Affiliation:
Winston Churchill High School
Hosam Mahmoud*
Affiliation:
The George Washington University
*
* Postal address: Winston Churchill High School, Potomac, MD 20854, USA. Email address: hrishikeshbalaji@gmail.com
** Postal address: Department of Statistics, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C. 20052, USA. Email address: hosam@gwu.edu

Abstract

We propose two distance-based topological indices (level index and Gini index) as measures of disparity within a single tree and within tree classes. The level index and the Gini index of a single tree are measures of balance within the tree. On the other hand, the Gini index for a class of random trees can be used as a comparative measure of balance between tree classes. We establish a general expression for the level index of a tree. We compute the Gini index for two random classes of caterpillar trees and see that a random multinomial model of trees with finite height has a countable number of limits in [0, ⅓], whereas a model with independent level numbers fills the spectrum (0, ⅓].

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Ceriani, L. and Verme, P. (2012). The origins of the Gini index: extracts from Variabilità e Mutabilità (1912) by Corrado Gini. J. Econom. Inequality 10, 421443. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] El-Basil, S. (1990). Caterpillar (Gutman) trees in chemical graph theory. In Advances in the Theory of Benzenoid Hydrocarbons (Topics Current Chem. 153), Springer, Berlin, pp. 273289. Google Scholar
[3] Feng, Q. and Hu, Z. (2011). On the Zagreb index of random recursive trees. J. Appl. Prob. 48, 11891196. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Feng, Q., Mahmoud, H. M. and Panholzer, A. (2008). Limit laws for the Randić index of random binary tree models. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 60, 319343. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Flajolet, P. and Prodinger, H. (1987). Level number sequences for trees. Discrete Math. 65, 149156. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Gastwirth, J. L. (1972). The estimation of the Lorenz curve and Gini index. Rev. Econom. Statist. 54, 306316. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Gini, C. (1912). Veriabilità e Mutabilità. Cuppini, Bologna. Google Scholar
[8] Gutman, I. (1977). Topological properties of benzenoid systems. Theoretica Chimica Acta 45, 309315. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Harary, F. and Schwenk, A. J. (1973). The number of caterpillars. Discrete Math. 6, 359365. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Neininger, R. (2002). The Wiener index of random trees. Combinatorics Prob. Comput. 11, 587597. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Schmuck, N. S., Wagner, S. G. and Wang, H. (2012). Greedy trees, caterpillars, and Wiener-type graph invariants. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 68, 273292. Google Scholar
[12] Tangora, M. C. (1991). Level number sequences of trees and the lambda algebra. Europ. J. Combinatorics 12, 433443. CrossRefGoogle Scholar