Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-11T16:42:24.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Uniformly distributed first-order autoregressive time series models and multiplicative congruential random number generators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

A. J. Lawrance*
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
*
Postal address: School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.

Abstract

The work is concerned with the first-order linear autoregressive process which has a rectangular stationary marginal distribution. A derivation is given of the result that the time-reversed version is deterministic, with a first-order recursion function of the type used in multiplicative congruential random number generators, scaled to the unit interval. The uniformly distributed sequence generated is chaotic, giving an instance of a chaotic process which when reversed has a linear causal and non-chaotic structure. An mk-valued discrete process is then introduced which resembles a first-order linear autoregressive model and uses k-adic arithmetic. It is a particular form of moving-average process, and when reversed approximates in m a non-linear discrete-valued process which has the congruential generator function as its deterministic part, plus a discrete-valued noise component. The process is illustrated by scatter plots of adjacent values, time series plots and directed scatter plots (phase diagrams). The behaviour very much depends on the adic number, with k = 2 being very distinctly non-linear and k = 10 being virtually indistinguishable from independence.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartlett, M. S. (1990) Chance or chaos? (with discussion). J. R. Statist. Soc. A 153, 321347.Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P. and Jenkins, G. M. (1976) Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control. Holden Day, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Chernick, M. R. and Davis, R. A. (1982) Extremes in autoregressive processes with uniform marginal distributions. Statist. Prob. Lett. 1, 8588.Google Scholar
Gaver, D. P. and Lewis, P. A. W. (1980) First-order autoregressive gamma sequences and point processes. Adv. Appl. Prob. 12, 727745.Google Scholar
Rao, P. S., Johnson, D. H. and Becker, D. D. (1992) Generation and analysis of non-Gaussian Markov time series. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc. 40, 845856.Google Scholar
Ripley, B. D. (1987) Stochastic Simulation. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, M. (1979) Linearity and non-linearity in time series. In Proc. 42nd Meeting Internat. Statist. Inst., Manila, 1, 423434.Google Scholar
Tong, H. (1990) Discussion to ‘Chance or Chaos?’ by M. S. Bartlett. J. R. Statist. Soc. A 153, 321347.Google Scholar
Whittle, P. (1963) Prediction and Regulation. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar