Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-25T11:21:29.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chinese Bandits: The Traditional Perception Re-Evaluated*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Thomas A. Metzger
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Chesneaux, Jean, ed., Popular Movements and Secret Societies in China, 1840–1950 (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1972), p.Google Scholar 17. Not all papers in this important volume reflect the editor's approach, but none focus on the issue of crime.

2 Ibid, p. 20.

3 Ibid, pp. 1–2. Chesneaux insists that the mem bership of the secret societies was drawn from the poorest strata {ibid p. 8), but there is adequate evidence, some even cited by him {ibid, pp. 6–7), that an important part of this membership consisted of military men, merchants and yamen underlings, i.e., some of the very groups typically regarded as oppressing the masses.

4 ibid, p. 2.

5 See p. 483 in Polachek, James, “Secret Societies in China and the Republican Revolution,” The Journal of Asian Studies, XXXII:3 (May 1973), pp. 483487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar