Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T11:32:27.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The History of Imperial China. A Research Guide. By Endymion Wilkinson. Harvard East Asian Monographs, 49. Cambridge, Mass.: East Asian Research Center, Harvard University, 1974. xxi, 213 pp. $6.00 (paper).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

N. Sivin
Affiliation:
Technology Studies Program, MIT
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews—China
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Isis, LXIV (1973, publ. 1974), 534–538.

2 Siven, N., “A Simple Method for Conversion of a Year Expressed in Cyclical Characters to the Corresponding Year in the Western Calendar,” Japanese Studies in the History of Science, IV (1966), 132134;Google ScholarGinzel, F. K., Handbuch der mathematischen tind technischen Chronologie (3 vols., Leipzig, 1906–1914).Google Scholar

3 Oppolzer, Th. v., Canon der Finsternisse (Wien, 1887; English translation by Owen Gingerich, Canon of Eclipses, New York, 1962).Google Scholar For finer determinations and for most solar eclipse visibility problems calculation is imperative. In particular, the visual methods used by H. H. Dubs were inadequate and make his writings on eclipses in China practically valueless. The computation technique is explained in Oppolzer and, for lunar eclipses, in Neugcbauer, P. V, Astronomische Chronologie (2 vols., Berlin and Leipzig, 1929).Google Scholar

4 For bibliographical essays on this problem and the one raised in No. 6 below, see Sivin, , Chinese Alchemy: Preliminary Studies (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1968), pp. 272321. A fuller list of recent Chinese taxonomic authorities is given in the review cited in Footnote 1 above.CrossRefGoogle Scholar