Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T21:32:50.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scripture and Society in Modern Muslim Asia—A Symposium Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

John R. Bowen
Get access

Extract

Since the late nineteenth century, Muslim movements for religious and social reform have underscored the value of making scripture accessible to a broad public. Scholars and activists alike have urged ordinary Muslim men and women to study and follow the Qur'ān and the hadīth (the reports of the Prophet Muhammad's words and deeds), and to do so they have rendered these scriptural writings and commentaries on them into the vernaculars of Asia, Africa, and Europe. They have also framed a wide range of appeals—to study the sciences, to modernize society, to stage a revolution—in the language and format of scriptural commentary. Vernacular writings (and, more recently, audio and videocassettes) based on scripture provide the foundations of popular religious education (Shahrani 1991), figure prominently in political movements (Fischer 1980; Kepel 1985), and serve as guides for living for Muslims traveling outside their homelands (Kepel 1987). The modern period has seen an explosion in the range of languages, genres, and contexts in which Muslims have authoritatively deployed scripture.

Type
Introduction
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , August 1993 , pp. 559 - 564
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Ahmed, Rafiuddin. 1988. “Conflict and Contradiction in Bengali Islam: Problems of Change and Adjustment.” In Ewing, Katherine P., ed., Sharī'at and Ambiguity in South Asian Islam, pp. 114–42. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1990. [Orig. 1984]. “Sembah-Sumpah: The Politics of Language and Javanese Culture.” In Language and Power: Exploring Political Cultures in Indonesia, pp. 194–237. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Antoun, Richard T. 1989. Muslim Preacher in the Modern World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun, Frank, J. Korom, and Margaret A. Mills, eds. 1991. Gender, Genre, and Power in South Asian Expressive Traditions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bowen, John R. 1993. Muslims through Discourse: Religion and Ritual in Gayo Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirks, Nicholas, ed. 1992. Colonialism and Culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eickelman, Dale F. 1985. Knowledge and Power in Morocco. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eickelman, Dale F. 1989. “National Identity and Religious Discourse in Contemporary Oman.” International Journal of Islamic and Arabic Studies 6: 1–20.Google Scholar
Federspiel, Howard M. 1970. Persatuan Islam: Islamic Reform in Twentieth Century Indonesia. Ithaca: Cornell University Modern Indonesia Project.Google Scholar
Fischer, Michael. 1980. Iran: From Religious Dispute to Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Michael and Mehdi, Abedi 1990. Debating Muslims: Cultural Dialogues in Tradition and Postmodernity. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Freitag, Sandria B. 1988. “Ambiguous Public Arenas and Coherent Personal Practice: Kanpur Muslims 1913–1931.” In Ewing, Katherine P., ed., Sharī'at and Ambiguity in South Asian Islam, pp. 143–63. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gaffney, Patrick. 1987. “Authority and the Mosque in Upper Egypt: The Islamic Preacher as Image and Actor.” In Roff, William R., ed., Islam and the Political Economy of Meaning, pp. 199–225. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
George, Kenneth M. 1991. “Headhunting, History, and Exchange in Upland Sulawesi.” The Journal of Asian Studies 50.3:536–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladney, Dru. 1991. Muslim Chinese: Ethnic Nationalism in the People's Republic. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. [Orig. 1962]. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Burger, Thomas, trans. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kepel, Gilles. 1985. Muslim Extremism in Egypt: The Prophet and the Pharaoh. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kepel, Gilles. 1987. Les banlieues de l'islam. Paris: Edition du Seuil.Google Scholar
Mardin, Serif. 1989. Religion and Social Change in Modern Turkey. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Messick, Brinkley. 1986. “The Mufti, the Text and the World: Legal Interpretation in Yemen.” Man (N.S.) 21: 102–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, Barbara Daly. 1982. Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband, 1860–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, Barbara Daly. 1990. Perfecting Women: Maulana Ashraf 'Ali Thanawi's Bihishti Zewar. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noer, Deliar. 1973. The Modernist Muslim Movement in Indonesia, 1900–1942. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roff, William R. 1967. The Origins of Malay Nationalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Lawrence. 1988. Bargaining for Reality: The Construction of Social Relations in a Muslim Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shahrani, M. Nazif. 1991. “Local Knowledge of Islam and Social Discourse in Afghanistan and Turkistan in the Modern Period.” In Canfield, Robert L., ed., Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective, pp. 161—88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stoler, Ann Laura. 1992. “‘In Cold Blood’: Hierarchies of Credibility and the Politics of Colonial Narratives.” Representations 37: 151–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar