Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T03:46:44.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Yellow River Administration in the Ch'ing Dynasty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Ch'ang-tu Hu
Get access

Extract

Traditionally, Chinese dynasties were characterized by the maintenance of a highly centralized bureaucracy whose prime objective was the preservation of central control over all important aspects of national life. The degree of effectiveness of the bureaucracy determined the degree of central power, the diminution and loss of which invariably led to the weakening and downfall of a dynasty. Since the economy of China was based on intensive farming, regulation of water, either for the positive purpose of irrigation or the Negative purpose of flood prevention, remained throughout Chinese history a matter of utmost importance and a principal concern of the state. The success or failure of a dynasty in handling this vital problem reflected the effectiveness of its bureaucracy, which in turn determined the fate of the dynasty itself.

Type
Special Number on Chinese History and Society
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , August 1955 , pp. 505 - 513
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ming shih (T'ung-wen ed.), 223Google Scholar (Lieh-chuan 111Google Scholar), 19b. By “water benefits” is meant the beneficial results derived from any form of systematic utilization of water, as irrigation.

2 Ch'ing shih kao (Peking, 1928)Google Scholar, Ho-ch'ū chih 1:1–2b.Google Scholar

3 I-shan, Hsiao, Ch'ing-tai t' ung-shih (Shanghai, 1935), 2:365Google Scholar; Hinton, Harold C., “Grain Transport Via the Grand Canal, 1845–1901,” Papers on China (Cambridge, Mass., 1950), 4:45.Google Scholar

4 Feng Kuei-fen , Chiao-pin-lu k'ang-i (Tientsin, 1881), 1:4a.Google Scholar

5 Shih-t'ung (Wan-yu wen-k'u ed., Commercial Press), 75: 8325a.Google Scholar

6 Fu Tse-hung , Hsing-shui chin-chien (first published 1725) (Shanghai, 1936)Google Scholar, ch. 165–166.

7 For figures of river personnel on various levels, see Ta-ch'ing hui-tien, 47:2–7a.Google Scholar

8 Yuan, Wei, Ku-wei-t'ang wai-chi , 4:13b–14a.Google Scholar

9 T'ing-k'ai, Chao, “Ho-kung li-hsiao liu-pi shuo,” in Huang-ch'ao ching-shih-wen hsü-pien (1898), 105:18a.Google Scholar

10 Huang-ch'ao ching-shih-wen t'ung-pien (Shanghai, 1901), 22:23b.Google Scholar

11 Yuüan, Wei, Ku-wei-t'ang wai-chi, 5:1a.Google Scholar

12 Ch'ing shih-lu, under Chia-ch'ing 16.8.12 (1811), 247:19b.Google Scholar

13 Ch'ing-yun, Wang, Hsi-ch'ao chi-cheng (Ning-hsiang, 1888), 3:21a.Google Scholar

14 These military campaigns were conducted by Emperor Kao-tsung in 1755–1757 and 1758–1759 respectively, resulting in the conquest of both areas. For more information, see Hummel, Arthur W., ed., Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing Period (Washington: U. S.Government Printing Office, 1943)Google Scholar, under Amursana and Chao-hui, 9–11, 72–74. Yu Shih-mei , preface to Chou Fu , Chih-shui shu-yao (1922), 1:3.Google Scholar

15 Liu Ch'eng-chung , “Ho-fang ts'o-i” in Huang-ch'ao ching-shihwen wen hsü-pien, 105:51.Google Scholar

16 Yüan, Wei, Ku-wei-t'ang wai-chi, 5:1a.Google Scholar