No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Family in Modern Chinese Law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 March 2011
Extract
The Civil Code of the Republic of China was published during the years 1929–1931, the Criminal Code in 1935. A great number of other law codes were published before and during this period. Almost all of them have the legal systems of Continental European countries as their basis. The driving power behind this feverish legislative activity was the endeavor of the Republican regime to modernize China and to eliminate every pretext of Western powers to perpetuate extraterritoriality.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1945
References
1 Escarra, Jean, Tcheng-tchong, Liou, Koung-ou, Houx, Jen-kie, Liang, Wen-ping, Hou, Recueil des Sommaires de la Jurisprudence de la Cour Suprême de la République de Chine en Matière Civile et Commerciale, Shanghai and Peking, 1924–1926 (hereafter cited as Recueit), p. 259Google Scholar; Jamieson, G., Chinese family and commercial law, Shanghai, 1921, p. I.Google Scholar
2 Law of Judicial Organisation of February 7, 1910. Article 35.
3 Cf. China Year Book, Tientsin, 1926, p. 760; Yao-tseng, Chang, Rccueil, p. I.Google Scholar
4 For an example see below.
5 For an example see below.
6 Articles 967–970. (Unless otherwise specified, the articles refer to the Civil Code.)
7 Articles 983, 1131 et al.; Criminal Code Article 167.
8 Escarra, Jean, Rccueil, p. 263.Google Scholar
9 Supreme Court, Ricueil, 531—1918, p.261; Suppl., 949—1919, p. 64; 940—1917, p. 65; 873—1919, p. 66. 869—1920, p. 64; 949—1919, p. 64.
10 Supreme Court, Recueil, 1—1913, p. 260.
11 Articles 1072–1083.
12 Thery, François (transl.), Supreme Court, L'Annie judicaire Chinoise, Shanghai, 1934–, 298—1932, p. 10Google Scholar (hereafter cited L'Année).
13 See below.
14 Supreme Court, Recueil, Suppl. 949—1919, p. 64.
15 Ibid., 949—1919, p. 64.
16 Ibid., 1100—1919, p. 64.
17 Ibid., 861—1919, p. 65.
18 Supreme Court, L'Année, 439—1932, p. 143.
19 Ibid.
20 Supreme Court, Recueil, 834—1916, p. 261.
21 Ibid., 861—1919, 940—1917, p. 65.
22 Ibid., 861—1919, p. 65.
23 Supreme Court, L'Année, 251—1929, p. 52.
24 von Moellendorff, P. G., Le droit de famille Chinois, Paris, 1896, p. 73.Google Scholar
25 Cf. Supreme Court, L'Année, 272—1930, p. 73, 291–1932, p. 4, 353—1932, p. 57, 527—1933, p. 41, 593—1933, p. 114.
26 Article 1122.
27 Article 1124.
28 Article 1124.
29 Articles 1125, 1126.
30 Quoted by Riasanovsky, V. A., Chinese Civil Law, Tientsin, 1938, p. 273.Google Scholar
31 Quoted by Hung, William S. H., Outlines of Modem Chinese Law, Shanghai, 1934, p. 192.Google Scholar
32 Cf. Recueil, pp. 268–269.
33 Cf. North China Herald, November 30, 1929, p. 368.
34 Article 1123.
35 Cf. Supreme Court, L'Armée, 280—1931, p. 84, 401—1932, p. 104, 441—1932, p. 146, 593—1933, p. 114.
36 Article 1114.
37 Article 1116.
38 Supreme Court, L'Année, 546—1933, p. 68, 609—1933, p. 126, 651—1933, p. 182.
39 Article 1128.
40 Article 1127.
41 Criminal Code, Article 240 II.
42 Criminal Code, Article 324.
41 Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 167.
44 Supreme Court, L'Année, 282—1931, p. 86.
45 Liu, Francis S., “Adultery as crime in China,” The China Law Review. VII, 1934–5, pp. 144–147.Google Scholar
46 Cf. on the social and legal meaning of the “engagement” in China, Escarra, Jean, Recueil, pp. 278 ff.Google Scholar
47 Article 972.
48 Articles 973, 974, Supreme Court, L'Année, 523–1933, p. 39.
49 Supreme Court, L'Année, 226—1929, p. 33, 289—1932, p. 3, 372—1932, p. 76, 549—1933, p. 80, 594—1933, p. 115, cf. 523—1933, p. 39. The great number of Supreme Court decisions dealing with the question of marriages concluded by parents on behalf of children shows how widespread this custom still is and how little the new law agrees with popular usage.
50 Articles 976–979. In western law codes only women can demand compensation for immaterial damages for reasons based on the natural differences between the parties.
51 Article 975.
52 Articles 980, 981.
53 Article 982.
54 Supreme Court, Recueil, 336—1914, p. 283, 80—1917, p. 283.
55 Cf. Escarra, Jean, Recueil, pp. 278 ff.Google Scholar
56 Supreme Court decisions quoted in Recueil, pp. 278 ff.
57 Supreme Court, L'Année, 343—1932, p. 46.
58 Ibid., 539—1933, p. 60.
59 Articles 1001–1002.
60 Article 1003.
61 Articles 1000, 1060.
62 Criminal Code, Article 239; Francis S. Liu, op. cit., pp. 144–147.
63 Article 1052 II.
64 Criminal Code, Article 245.
65 Article 1053.
66 Francis S. Liu, op. cit., p. 145.
67 E.g. L'Année, 280—1931, p. 84, 401—1932, p. 104, 441—1932, p. 146, 593—1933, p. 114.
68 Article 1067 I.
69 Article 1065.
70 Supreme Court, quoted by Riasanovsky, V. A., op. cit., p. 266.Google Scholar
71 Article 1064.
72 Articles 1049, 1050.
73 Article 1052 IV.
74 Cf. Jamieson, G., op. cit., pp. 53 ff.Google Scholar
75 Articles 1052–1055, L'Année 585—1933, p. 106.
76 Jamieson, G., op. cit., p. 55.Google Scholar