Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T20:31:57.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Rebirth of Shiv Sena: The Symbiosis of Discursive and Organizational Power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2010

Get access

Extract

In rally upon rally over the last half-dozen years, Shiv Sena party supporters have been exhorted to intone, “Say with pride, that we are Hindu” (“Garva se kaho hum hindu hai”). In Hindi, not Marathi. This incantation as a centerpiece of Shiv Sena events would have been scarcely imaginable in the early years of Shiv Sena. Both the stress on a Hindu identity and the use of Hindi in political sloganeering are indicative of a major shift in the politics of regionalism in Western India.

This turn to Hinduism is what seemed to underly the outbreak of violence in Bombay on a scale never before witnessed in the city. In the winter of 1992–93, Bombay experienced the worst Hindu-Muslim conflagration the city has ever known. According to Human Rights Watch, over 1,000 people were killed, and tens or perhaps hundreds of thousands fled the city (1995, 26–27). It is a shift in which the once-local, nativist party in Bombay, the Shiv Sena, now finds itself the dominant political force in the state of Maharashtra, with a ready capacity to incite widespread violence, extract rents, and shape public policy and legislative initiatives (including the decision to first nullify and then renegotiate the Enron power project that recently captured global attention). This article attempts to understand the role of religious nationalism in the ascendancy of Shiv Sena.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

“Suitable Hindutvavadi,” 1995 Times of India, 26 March.Google Scholar
Anderson, John Ward. 1993. “The Flames that Lit an Inferno.” Washington Post, 11 August.Google Scholar
“Anti-Joshi Remarks Upset Alliance.” 1995. Times of India, 29 June.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Sikata. 1995. “Hindu Nationalism and the Construction of Women: The Shiv Sena Organises Women in Bombay.” In Women and the Hindu Right, edited by Sarkar, Tanika, Butali., and UrvashiNew Delhi: Kali for Women.Google Scholar
Bhandare, Namita. 1995. “Courting Trouble.” Sunday, 16–22 April.“Congress(I) Losing Ground.” 1995. India Today, 15 February.Google Scholar
Engineer, Ashgar Ali. 1989. “Anatomy of Shiv Sena's Growth.” Mainstream, 3 September.Google Scholar
Engineer, Ashgar Ali. “Communalis m and Communal Violence in 1995.” Economic and Political Weekly, 23 December.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. Archeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Gupta, Dipankar. 1982. Nativism in a Metropolis: The Shiv Sena in Bombay. Delhi: Manohar Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Hansen, Thoma S Blom. 1995. “Democratisation, Mass-Politics and Hindu Identity: The Communalisation of Bombay.” Paper prepared for the workshop on Political Culture and Religion in the Third World, ECPR Joint Session, Bordeaux, April-May. Hansen is reachable at International Development Studies, Roskilde University, Denmark.Google Scholar
Heuzé, Gerard. 1995. “Cultural Populism: The Appeal of the Shiv Sena.” In Bombay: Metaphor for Modern India, edited by Patel, Sujata and Thorner, Alice. Bombay: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Human, Rights Watch. 1995. Playing the “Communal Card”: Communal Violence and Human Rights. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Joshi, Ram. 1995. “Politics in Maharashtra—An Overview.” In Politics in Maharashtra, edited by Thakkar, Usha, Kulkarni., and MangeshDelhi: Himalaya.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod. 1979. Ethnicity and Equality; Preferential Policies in Bombay. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kulkarni, Sudheendra. 1987. “The Ominous Entry of Shiv Sena in Rural Areas.” Mainstream, 7 March.Google Scholar
Lele, Jayant. 1995. “Saffronisation of Shiv Sena.” Economic and Political Weekly, 24 June. Also reprinted in Patel and Thorner, eds.Google Scholar
Menezes, Saira. 1966. “Sena's History Reversed.” Outlook, 6 November.Google Scholar
Menon, Meena. 1995. “Straight Contest in Worli and Naigaum.” Times of India, 9 February.Google Scholar
Naipaul, V. S. 1991. India: A Million Mutinies Now. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
“Native Appeal.” 1995. India Today. 28 February.Google Scholar
Omvedt, Gail. 1993. Reinventing Revolution: New Social Movements and the Socialist Tradition in India. Armonk, N.Y.: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Patel, Sujata, and Thorner, Alice, eds. 1995. Bombay: Metaphorfor Modern India Bombay: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palshikar, Suhas. 1996. “Capturing the Moment of Realignment.” Economic and Political Weekly, 13–20 January.Google Scholar
Patwardhan, Anand. 1994. Father Son and Holy War. New York: First Run/ Icarus Films.Google Scholar
Phadke, Y. D. 1979. Politics and Language. Bombay: Himalaya Publishing House.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter W., and Dimaggio, Paul J.. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Prabhu, Uma Keni. 1988. “Shiv Sena Riding the Tiger.” Bombay, 7–21 August.Google Scholar
Rahman, M. 1995. “Primed for Battle.” India Today, 15 February.Google Scholar
Rahman, M. with Lekha Rattanani. 1995. “Savagery in Bombay.” India Today, 31 January.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. K. 1993. “The Press Protest.” Frontline, 8 October.Google Scholar
Rattanani, Lekha. 1995. “Paper Tiger.” India Today, 28 February.Google Scholar
Rattanani, Lekha, and Koppikar., Smruti 1995.“Storming the Citadel.” India Today, 31 March.Google Scholar
Sadhu, Arun. 1988. “Not by Jobs Alone.” Free Press Journal, 6 January.Sainath, P. 1993 Video of talk delivered after 1992–93 riots. P. Sainath is a journalist with Blitz. Available with Mary Katzenstein, Department of Government, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Sardesai, Rajdeep. 1989. “Shiv Sena Plays the Hindu Card.” Times of India, 19 June.Google Scholar
Sardesai, Rajdeep. 1995. “The Shiv Sena's New Avatar; Marathi Chauvinism and Hindu Communalism.” In Politics in Maharashtra, edited by Thakkar, Usha, Kulkarni., and MangeshDelhi: Himalaya.Google Scholar
Scott, W. Richard. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
“Sena Strength Spreading.” 1989. Onlooker, 16–30 September.Google Scholar
Setalvad, Teesta. 1995. “The Woman Shiv Sainik and her Sister Swayamsevika.” In Women and the Hindu Right, edited by Sarkar, Tanika, Butalia., and UrvashiDelhi: Kali for Women.Google Scholar
Singh, Anil. 1995. “Dharavi Constituency May Witness Triangular Contest.” Times of India, February.Google Scholar
Singhvi, Vir. 1984. “I Still Believe in Dictatorship.” Illustrated Weekly, 19 February.Google Scholar
“Strategic End to Thackeray Drive.” 1990. Times of India, 26 February.Google Scholar
Thakkar, Usha. 1995. “The Commissioner and the Corporators; Power Politics at Municipal Level.” In Bombay: Metaphor for Modern India, edited by Patel, Sujata, Thorner., and AliceBombay: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
“Uneasy Lies the Head.” 1996. The Telegraph, 20 July.Google Scholar
Vijapurkar, Mahesh. 1989. “Shiv Sena; the Hindu Card.” Frontline, 21 January.Google Scholar
Vora, Rajendra. 1996. “Shift of Power from Rural to Urban Sector.” Economic and Political Weekly, 13–20 January.Google Scholar
Women, Law and the Media Workshop. 1994. “Shifting Boundaries,” Annexure H, Organised by the Centre for Feminist Legal Research in association with the Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development, October 22–28. Jamia Hamdard, Delhi.Google Scholar
Zelliott, Eleanor. 1992. From Untouchable to Dalit: Essays on the Ambedkar Movement. Delhi: Manohar.Google Scholar