Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T19:37:47.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing General Equilibrium Benefit Analyses for Social Programs: An Introduction and Example

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2015

H. Allen Klaiber  and
V. Kerry Smith
H. Allen Klaiber
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
V. Kerry Smith
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Tempe
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Benefit-Cost analyses of social programs often involve complex interactions between market and non-market goods. In this paper we outline one conceptual framework for incorporating the general equilibrium effects into benefit-cost analyses of changes in social programs. The goal is to develop models that are capable of capturing the interactions that take place between decisions involving marketed goods together with their effects on non-market goods and the reverse –changes in non-market goods that cause induce changes in decisions about marketed goods. These types of feedback effects are likely to result from large changes in social programs. These effects are compounded by the potential for endogenous realized outcomes that arise as a result of household actions taken in response to proposed policies. To demonstrate the importance of our conceptual discussion of these general equilibrium effects, we present an empirical example of our general equilibrium framework using teacher cuts in response to budget pressures in Maricopa County, Arizona. We find substantial differences in willingness to pay measures between models which account for endogenous education outcomes in a general equilibrium setting and those which ignore the linkages between market (housing) and non-market (education) goods in a partial equilibrium setting

Keywords

general equilibriumsocial programseducation
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , 08 May 2012 , pp. 1 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis 2012

References

Banzhaf, H. Spencer and Smith, V. Kerry. 2007. “Meta-analysis in Model Implementation: Choice Sets and the Valuation of Air Quality Improvements.” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(6): 1013–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Patrick, Ferreira, Fernando and McMillan, Robert. 2007. “A Unified Framework for Measuring Preferences for Schools and Neighborhoods.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 115(4) August: 588–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Sandra E. 1999. “Do Better Schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 114(2) May: 577–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockstael, Nancy E. and McConnell, Kenneth E. 2007. Environmental and Resource Valuation with Revealed Preferences (Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.)Google Scholar
Böhringer, Christopher and Rutherford, Thomas F. 2008. “Combining Bottom-up and Top-down” Energy Economics, Vol. 30(2): 574–596.Google Scholar
Boyle, Kevin J., Kuminoff, Nicolai V., Parameter, Christopher F. and Pope, Jaren C. 2010. “The Benefit Transfer Challenges.” Annual Review of Resource Economics, Vol. 2 (Palo Alto, CA: The Annual Reviews) pp. 161–182.Google Scholar
Carbone, Jared C. 2005. “Calibrating Non-separable General Equilibrium Models.” Unpublished Working paper, CEnREP: North Carolina State University, March.Google Scholar
Carbone, Jared C. 2007. “The Properties of Non-Price Equilibria.” Unpublished Working Paper, Department of Economics, Williams College, August 27.Google Scholar
Carbone, Jared C. and Smith, V. Kerry. 2008. “Evaluating Policy Interventions With General Equilibrium Externalities.” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 92(5–6) June: 1254–1274.Google Scholar
Carbone, Jared C. and Smith, V. Kerry. 2010. “Valuing Ecosystem Services in General Equilibrium.” March, NBER Working Paper #15844.Google Scholar
Carbone, Jared C., Carsten, Helm and Rutherford, Thomas F. “The case for international emission trade in the absence of cooperative climate policy” Journal of environmental Economics and management, Vol. 58(3): 266–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chetty, Raj. 2009. “Sufficient Statistics for Welfare Analysis: A Bridge Between Structural and Reduced-Form Models.” Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 1 (Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews): 451–488.Google Scholar
De Mooij, Ruud A. 2000. Environmental Taxation and the Double Dividend, (Amsterdam: North Holland).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Peter A. and McFadden, Daniel L. 1974. “Some Uses of the Expenditure Function in Public Finance.” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 3(1) February: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epple, Dennis and Platt, Glenn J. 1998. “Equilibrium and Local Redistribution in an Urban Economy when Households Differ in both Preferences and Incomes.” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 43(1) January: 23–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epple, Dennis and Sieg, Holger. 1999. “Estimating Equilibrium Models of Local Jurisdiction.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 107(4) August: 645–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epple, Dennis, Romer, T. and Sieg, Holger. 2001. “Interjurisdictional Sorting and Majority Rule: An Empirical Analysis.” Econometrica, Vol. 69(6) November: 1437–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epple, Dennis, Gordon, Brett and Sieg, Holger. 2009. “Drs. Mirth and Mills meet Dr. Tiebout: Integrating Location Specific Amenities into Multicommunity Equilibrium Models.” Unpublished paper prepared for 50th Anniversary Conference of Journal of Regional Science, March.Google Scholar
Espinosa, J. Andrés and Smith, V. Kerry. 1995. “Measuring the Environmental Consequences of Trade Policy: A Nonmarket CGE Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 77(3) August: 772–777.Google Scholar
Farrow, Scott. 1999. “The Duality of Taxes and Tradable Permits: A Survey with Applications in Central and Eastern Europe.” Environmental and Development Economics, Vol. 4(4): 519–535.Google Scholar
Fernandez, Raquel and Rogerson, Richard. 1998. “Public Education and Income Distribution: A Dynamic Quantitative Evaluation of Education-Finance Reform.” The American Economic Review, Vol. 88(4) September: 813–833.Google Scholar
Ferreyra, Maria Marta. 2007. “Estimating the Effects of Private School Vouchers in Multidistrict Economies.” American Economic Review, Vol. 97(3) June: 789–817.Google Scholar
Ferreyra, Maria Marta. 2009. “An Empirical Framework for Large Scale Policy Analysis with an Application to School Finance Reform in Michigan.” American Economic Journal, Economic Policy, Vol. 1(1) February: 147–180.Google Scholar
Freeman, A. Myrick III. 2003. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods, second edition. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Fullerton, Don, Henderson, Yolanda K. and Shoven, John B. 1984. “A Comparison of Equilibrium Models of Taxation.” In Applied General Equilibrium Analysis edited by Scarf, H.E. and Shoven, J.B.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fullerton, Don and Metcalf, Gilbert. 1997. “Environmental Controls, Scarcity Rents and Pre-existing Distortions.” NBER Working Paper# 6091.Google Scholar
Goulder, Lawrence H. and Williams, Roberton C. III. 2003. “The Substantial Bias from Ignoring General Equilibrium Effects in Estimating Excess Burden, and a Practical Solution.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 111(4) August: 898–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulder, Lawrence H., Parry, Ian W.H., Williams, Roberton C. III and Burtraw, Dallas. 1999. “The Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Instruments for Environmental Protection in a Second-Best Setting,” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 72(3) June: 329–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanemann, W. Michael. 1991. “Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?” American Economic Review, Vol. 81(3 June):635–647.Google Scholar
Harberger, Arnold C. 1964. “The Measurement of Waste.” American Economic Review, Vol. 54(1): 58–76.Google Scholar
Harrison, Glenn W. and Vinod, H.D. 1992. “The Sensitivity of Analysis of Applied General Equilibrium Models: Completely Randomized Factorial Designs.” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 74(2) May: 357–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazilla, Michael, and Kopp, Raymond J. 1990. “The Social Cost of Environmental Quality Regulation: A General Equilibrium Analysis.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98(4) August: 853–873.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J. 2006. “Skill Formation and the Economics of Investing in Disadvantaged Children.” Science, Vol. 312(5782) June: 1900–1902.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J. 2008. “Schools, Skills and Synapses.” Economic Inquiry, Vol. 46(3) July: 289–324.Google Scholar
Hoehn, John and Randall, Alan. 1989. “Too Many Proposals Pass the Benefit Cost Test.” American Economic Review, Vol. 79(3) June: 544–551.Google Scholar
Jones, Ronald W. 1965. “The Structure of Simple General Equilibrium Models.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 73(6) December: 557–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, Richard E., Hueth, Darrell L. and Schmitz, Andrew. 2004. The Welfare Economics of Public Policy: A Practical Approach to Project and Policy Evaluation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Klaiber, H. Allen and Phaneuf, Daniel J. 2010. “Valuing Open Space in a Residential Sorting Model of the Twin Cities.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 60(2): 57–77.Google Scholar
Klaiber, H. Allen and Smith, V. Kerry. 20011a. “Quasi Experiments, Hedonic Models, and Estimating Tradeoffs for Local Amenities.” Working Paper, August.Google Scholar
Klaiber, H. Allen and Smith, V. Kerry. 2011b. “Preference Heterogeneity and Non-Market Benefits: The Roles of Structural Hedonic and Sorting Models.” In Bennett, Jeff, ed., The International Yearbook of Non-Market Valuation (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar) pp. 222–253.Google Scholar
Kuminoff, Nicolai V. 2009. “Decomposing the Structural Identification of Nonmarket Values.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 57(2) March: 123–139.Google Scholar
Kuminoff, Nicolai V. and Pope, Jaren C. 2010. “Hedonic Equilibria, Land Value Capitalization, and the Willingness to Pay for Public Goods.” May, Working Paper.Google Scholar
Kuminoff, Nicolai V., Smith, V. Kerry and Timmins, Christopher. 2010 “The New Economics of Equilibrium Sorting and its Transformational Role for Policy Evaluation.” September, NBER Working Paper# 16349.Google Scholar
NechybaThomas, J. Thomas, J. 1999. “School Finance Induced Migration and Stratification Patterns: The Impact of Private School Vouchers.” Journal of Public Economic Theory, Vol. 1(1) January: 5–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NechybaThomas, J. Thomas, J. 2000. “Mobility, Targeting, and Private-School Vouchers.” American Economic Review, Vol. 90(1) March: 130–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, Raymond B. 1992. “Valuing Localized Externalities.” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 31(1) January: 59–68.Google Scholar
Parry, Ian, Williams, Roberton and Goulder, Lawrence. 1999. “When Can Carbon Abatement Policies Increase Welfare? The Fundamental Role of Distorted Factor Markets.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 37(1) January: 52–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perroni, Carlo. 1992. “Homothetic Representations of Regular Non-Homothetic Preferences.” Economics Letters, Vol. 40(1) September: 19–22.Google Scholar
Phaneuf, Daniel J., Smith, V. Kerry, Palmquist, Raymond B. and Pope, Jaren C., 2008, “Integrating Property Value and Local Recreation Models to Value Ecosystem Services in Urban Watersheds,” Land Economics, Vol. 84(3) August: 361–381.Google Scholar
Poterba, James M. 1992. “Taxation and Housing: Old Questions, New Answers.” American Economic Review, Vol. 82(2) May: 237–242.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Thomas F. 1997. “Applied General Equilibrium Modeling with MPSGE as a GAMS Subsystem: An Overview of the Modeling Framework and Syntax.” Unpublished Paper, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, March.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Thomas F. 2002. “Lecture Notes on Constant Elasticity Forms.” Unpublished Paper, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, November.Google Scholar
Scarf, Herbert. 1973. The Computation of Economic Equilibrium (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Shoven, John and Whalley, John. 1992. Applying General Equilibrium (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
SiegHolger, V. Holger, V.Kerry Smith, H.Banzhaf, Spencer and Walsh, Randy. 2002. “Interjurisdictional Housing Prices in Location Equilibrium.” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 52(1) July: 131–153.Google Scholar
SiegHolger, V. Holger, V.Kerry Smith, H.Banzhaf, Spencer and Walsh, Randy. 2004. “Estimating the General Equilibrium Benefits of Large Changes in Spatially Delineated Public Goods.” International Economic Review, Vol. 45(4) November: 1047–1077.´Google Scholar
Smith, V. Kerry and Carbone, Jared C. 2007. “Should Benefit Cost Analyses Take Account of General Equilibrium Effects?” Research in Law and Economics: A Journal of Policy, Vol. 23 edited by Zerbe, Richard O. Jr. (Amsterdam: Elsevier), pp. 247–272.Google Scholar
Smith, V. Kerry, Holger Sieg, H.Banzhaf, Spencer and Walsh, Randy. 2004. “General Equilibrium Benefits for Environmental Improvements: Projected Ozone Reductions under EPA’s Prospective Analysis for the Los Angeles Air Basin.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 47(3) May: 559–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiebout, Charles M. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 64(5) October: 416–424.Google Scholar
Walsh, Randall L. 2007. “Endogenous Open Space Amenities in a Locational Equilibrium.” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 61(2) March: 319–344.Google Scholar
West, Sarah and Williams, Roberton. 2004. “Estimates from a Consumer Demand System: Implications for the Incidence of Environmental Taxes.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 47(3) May: 535–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalley, John. 1975. “How Reliable is Partial Equilibrium Analysis?” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 57(3): 299-310Google Scholar
Whittington, Dale and MacRae, Duncan Jr., 1986, “The Issue of Standing in Cost-Benefit Analysis,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 5(4): 665–682.Google Scholar
Willig, Robert. 1976. “Consumer’s Surplus Without Apology.” American Economic Review, Vol. 66(4) September: 589–597.Google Scholar