Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-mhpxw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:49:05.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring The Social Opportunity Cost of Labor In Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2015

Sylvia B. Guillermo-Peon
Affiliation:
Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla
Arnold C. Harberger
Affiliation:
University of California - Los Angeles
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper reviews the theory underlying the concept of the social opportunity cost of labor (SOCL), as that concept is used in benefit-cost analysis and in applied welfare economics generally. It then presents in detail the procedures to be followed in estimating the SOCL in real-world cases. Important steps in data processing include calculating gross and net wages from data on “reported” wages. Further economic analysis involves taking account of migration patterns and of labor market duality. Estimates are made for 32 labor market areas in Mexico, covering 21 occupations for males and 19 for females.

Our main results are a) that there are important differences between reported wages and the gross wages paid by employers, and also between both of these and the net wages received by workers, and b) that taking labor market duality into account leads to significant modifications of our SOCL estimates. More important, perhaps, than our specific estimates for Mexico, is the methodological framework that we use. This framework, based on the fundamental principles of applied welfare economics, can serve as a useful starting point for serious estimation of the SOCL for other countries.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis 2012

References

Edwards, Alexandra Cox (1989). “Labor Supply Price, Market Wage, and the Social Opportunity Cost of Labor”. Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 38, No. 1. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
González Marín, Eloy (1995). El Costo de Oportunidad Social de la Mano de Obra Urbana en México. CEPEP. Informe Final. México.Google Scholar
Harberger, Arnold C. (1971a). “Three Basic Postulates for Applied Welfare Economics: An Interpretive Essay”. Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 9, No. 3 (Sept., 1971), pp. 785797. American Economic Association.Google Scholar
Harberger, Arnold C. (1971b). “On Measuring the Social Opportunity Cost of Labor”. International Labor Review, Vol. 103, No. 6. Reprinted in Employment Creation in Emerging Societies, ed. by Wohlmuth, Karl. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1975.Google Scholar
Harberger, Arnold C. (2008). “Introduction to Cost-Benefit Analysis, Part II: Labor Market Issues.” Los Angeles, CA: University of California, December, 2008.Google Scholar
INEGI (2008a). Delimitación de Zonas Metropolitanas de México 2005. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Edición 2008. Biblioteca Digital. Available at: http://www.inegi.org.mx/prod_serv/contenidos/espanol/biblioteca/default.asp?accion=2&upc=702825001537&seccionB=bdGoogle Scholar
INEGI (2008b). Clasificación Mexicana de Ocupaciones (CMO), Vol. I, Marzo, 2008.Google Scholar
INEGI (2008c). Clasificación Mexicana de Ocupaciones (CMO), Vol. II, Marzo, 2008.Google Scholar
INEGI. Glosario de la Encuesta Nacional de Ocupación y Empleo. Available at: http://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/glosario/Default.aspx?ClvGlo=EHENOE&s=est&c=10842Google Scholar
Jenkins, Glenn P. (1995). Economic Opportunity Cost of Labor: A Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Institute for International Development, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Glenn P., Kuo, Chun-Yan and Harberger, Arnold C. (2011). Cost-Benefit Analysis for Investment Decisions. John Deutsch Institute, Queen’s University.Google Scholar