Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-jhxnr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T03:33:31.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LACTATIONAL AMENORRHOEA IN WELL-NOURISHED TOBA WOMEN OF FORMOSA, ARGENTINA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2004

CLAUDIA VALEGGIA
Affiliation:
Reproductive Ecology Labouratory, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
PETER T. ELLISON
Affiliation:
Reproductive Ecology Labouratory, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

Abstract

The proximate causes of the contraceptive effect of lactation are still a matter of productive debate. This study sought to disentangle the relative impact that intense breast-feeding practices and maternal nutrition have on the regulation of ovarian function in nursing women. A mixed-longitudinal, direct-observational, prospective study was conducted of the return to postpartum fecundity in 113 breast-feeding, well-nourished Toba women. A sub-sample of 70 women provided data on nursing behaviour, daily activities, diet quality and urinary levels of oestrone and progesterone metabolites. Well-nourished, intensively breast-feeding Toba women experienced a relatively short period of lactational amenorrhoea (10·2±4·3 months) and a high lifetime fertility (TFR=6·7 live births/woman). Duration of lactational amenorrhoea was not correlated with any of the nursing parameters under study or with static measures of maternal nutritional status. The results indicated that the pattern of resumption of postpartum fertility could be explained, at least partly, by differences in individual metabolic budgets. Toba women resumed postpartum ovulation after a period of sustained positive energy balance. As the relative metabolic load hypothesis suggests, the variable effect of lactation on postpartum fertility may not depend on the intensity of nursing per se but rather on the energetic stress that lactation represents for the individual mother.

Type
Regular Articles
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)