Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T22:22:06.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

POLITICAL BOUNDARY VERSUS SOCIAL CONTEXT: DYNAMICS OF SOCIOECONOMIC DIFFERENTIALS IN FERTILITY IN INDIAN STATES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2017

Dharma Arunachalam ,
Kannan Navaneetham  and
Walter Forrest
Dharma Arunachalam*
Affiliation:
School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Kannan Navaneetham
Affiliation:
Department of Population Studies, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana
Walter Forrest
Affiliation:
School of Social Science and Institute for Social Science Research, University of Queensland, Australia ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course, Australia
*
1Corresponding author. Email: dharma.arunachalam@monash.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Using data from India’s first (1992–93) and third (2005–06) National Family Health Surveys (NFHS-I and NFHS-III) this study examined the fertility differentials between major social groups and the extent to which these varied between states and over time. The analysis was based on a sample of 54,030 and 55,369 currently married women aged 15–34 in the NFHS-I and NFHS-III respectively. Reported parity and desired family size were used to assess variations in fertility behaviour. The results show that interstate variation in childbearing patterns within social groups was at least as high as, if not higher than, variation between states (net of other influences) in both periods, 1992–93 and 2005–06. The variations among Hindus, the poor and Muslims were more noticeable than for other groups. These variations did not decline between 1992–93 and 2005–06 and may have even increased slightly for some groups. Further, there was no consistent north–south divide in either fertility behaviour or desired family size. Together, these results may point to the gradual disappearance of the influences that were once unique to southern or northern India, and the simultaneous emergence of social, political, economic and cultural forces that are pan-Indian in their reach.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 49 , Special Issue S1: Low Fertility in Developing Countries: Causes and Implications , November 2017 , pp. S156 - S171
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alagarajan, M. & Kulkarni, P. M. (1998) Fertility differentials by religion in Kerala: a period parity progression ratio analysis Demography India 27(1), 213–228.Google Scholar
Alagarajan, M. & Kulkarni, P. M. (2008) Religious differentials in fertility in India: is there a convergence? Economic and Political Weekly 43(48), 44–53.Google Scholar
Arokiasamy, A. & Goli, S. (2012) Fertility convergence in the Indian states: an assessment of changes in averages and inequalities in fertility. Genus LXVIII No. 1, 65–88.Google Scholar
Basu, A. M. & Amin, S. (2000) Conditioning factors for fertility decline in Bengal: history, language identity, and openness to innovations. Population and Development Review 26(4), 761–794.Google Scholar
Bhat, P. N. M. (1996) Contours of fertility decline in India: a district level study based on the 1991 census. In Srinivasan, K. (ed.) Population Policy and Reproductive Health. Hindustan Publishers, New Delhi, pp. 96–179.Google Scholar
Bhat, P. N. M. & Zavier, F. (1999) Findings of National Family Health Survey: regional analysis. Economic and Political Weekly 34(42&43), 3008–3033.Google Scholar
Bose, A. (2007) Beyond population projections: growing north–south disparity. Economic and Political Weekly 42(15), 1327–1329.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J. C. & Caldwell, P. (1988) Is the Asian family planning program model suited to Africa? Studies in Family Planning 19(1), 19–28.Google Scholar
Das, N. P. & Pandey, D. (1985) Fertility differentials by religion in India: an analysis of 1971 census fertility data. Canadian Journal of Population 12(2), 119–136.Google Scholar
Das Gupta, M. (1995) Fertility decline in Punjab, India: parallels with historical Europe. Population Studies 49(3), 481–500.Google Scholar
Dharmalingam, A. & Morgan, S. P. (2004) Pervasive Muslim–Hindu fertility differences in India. Demography 41(3), 529–545.Google Scholar
Dharmalingam, A., Navaneetham, K. & Morgan, S. P. (2005) Muslim–Hindu fertility differences: evidence from National Family Health Survey II. Economic and Political Weekly, January. 429–436.Google Scholar
Dharmalingam, A., Rajan, S. & Morgan, S. P. (2014) The determinants of low fertility in India. Demography 51(4), 1451–1475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dommaraju, P. & Agadjanian, V. (2009) India’s north–south divide and theories of fertility change. Journal of Population Research 26(3), 249–272.Google Scholar
Dyson, T. & Moore, M. (1983) On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behaviour in India. Population and Development Review 9(1), 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilmoto, C. Z. (2015) The past and future of fertility change in India. In Guilmoto, C. Z. & Jones, G. W. (eds) Contemporary Demographic Transformations in China, India and Indonesia. Springer, Switzerland, pp. 113–132.Google Scholar
Guilmoto, C. Z. & Rajan, S. I. (2001) Spatial patterns of fertility transition in Indian districts. Population and Development Review 27(4), 713–738.Google Scholar
Jain, A. K. & Adlakha, A. L. (1982) Preliminary estimates of fertility decline in India during the 1970s. Population and Development Review 8(3), 589–606.Google Scholar
Mishra, V. (2002) Muslim/Non-Muslim Differentials in Fertility and Family Planning in India. East West Center Working Paper: Population and Health Series No. 112. East–West Center, Honolulu.Google Scholar