Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T06:30:11.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Family growth in Aberdeen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Barbara Thompson  and
Raymond Illsley
Barbara Thompson
Affiliation:
Medical Sociology Research Unit (Medical Research Council), University of Aberdeen
Raymond Illsley
Affiliation:
Medical Sociology Research Unit (Medical Research Council), University of Aberdeen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper reports the findings of longitudinal studies of married primigravidae resident in Aberdeen city:

(1) All 1026 primigravidae delivered in 1949 were followed up 5 years later.

(2) A 1-in-6 random sample of primigravidae delivered 1950–53 (330 women) were studied intensively and followed up at 5 and 10 years.

The findings are biased in favour of families of manual workers because more upper social class families left Aberdeen.

Many primigravidae had no definite ideas on family size but they made up their minds or changed their preferences (sometimes to accommodate to reality) as they gained experience of marriage and motherhood. Most women wanted 2 or 3 children and none wanted more than 4 children.

There were striking differentials in fertility at both 5 and 10 years. Women who were under 20 years of age when they had their first baby, those who conceived prenuptially, and those married to a semi-skilled or unskilled manual worker had the largest families at both 5 and 10 years. At 5 years, although on average such women were having intercourse more frequently, they were the least likely to have been regular users of contraceptives.

Two-thirds of all pregnancies which occurred in the first 5 years were ‘unintended’. Only 15% of couples had used contraceptives regularly from marriage and a further 20% became regular users in the 5 years following the birth of their first child. At the end of the first 5 years, 10% of women already had more children ‘than they felt able to manage without excessive strain’. The number increased in the following years but was modified partly by delegation of responsibility for a few children to other women but more especially by the liberal policy to sterilization pursued in Aberdeen. The repetition of the disadvantages in the childhood environment of the largest families is illustrated. It is argued that ‘the pill’, which was not available to the women in the studies reported, may reduce the number of ‘unintended‘ pregnancies in future, but that sterilization may remain the most satisfactory measure of family limitation in a small group of women whose way of life is not conducive to forward planning and sustained rational behaviour.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , January 1969 , pp. 23 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, D. (1952) Preventive medicine in obstetrics. New Engl. J. Med. 246, 561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baird, D. (1965) A fifth freedom? Br. med. J. ii, 1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, R.M. (1952) The shape and size of the female pelvis. Edinb. med. J. 59, 1.Google ScholarPubMed
Bernstein, B. (1960) Language and social class. Br. J. Social. 11, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, J.W.B. (1964) The Home and the School. MacGibbon & Kee, London.Google Scholar
General Register Office (1951) Classification of Occupations 1950. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Goodman, L.A. & Kruskall, W.H. (1954) Measures of association for cross classifications. J. Am. statist. Ass. 49, 732.Google Scholar
Illsley, R., Finlayson, A. & Thompson, B. (1963) The motivation and characteristics of internal migrants. Parts I and II. Milbank meml Fundq. Bull. 41, 115, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illsley, R. & Kincaid, J. (1963) Social correlates of perinatal mortality. In: Perinatal Mortality, p. 270. Edited by Butler, N.R. & Bonham, D.G.. Livingstone, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Illsley, R. & Thompson, B. (1961) Women from broken homes. Social. Rev. 9, 27.Google Scholar
Nisbet, J.D. & Entwistle, N.J. (1967) Intelligence and family size. Br. J. educ. Psychol. 37, 188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rainwater, L. (1960) And the Poor get Children. Quadrangle Books, Chicago.Google Scholar
Scott, E.M., Illsley, R. & Biles, M.E. (1956) A psychological investigation of primigravidae. III. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Br. Emp. 63, 494.Google Scholar
Scott, E.M., Illsley, R. & Thomson, A.M. (1956) A psychological investigation of primigravidae. II. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Br. Emp. 63, 338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, E.M. & Thomson, A.M. (1956) A psychological investigation of primigravidae. I. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Br. Emp. 63, 331.Google Scholar
Scottish Council for Research in Education (1953) Social Implications of the 1947 Scottish Mental Survey. University Press, London.Google Scholar
Spinley, B.M. (1953) The Deprived and the Privileged. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Swift, D.F. (1965) Educational psychology, sociology and the environment: a controversy at cross-purposes. Br. J. Social. 16, 334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, B. (1954) Housing of growing families in Aberdeen. Med. Offr, 91, 235.Google Scholar
Thompson, B., Durno, D., Macgregor, J.E. & McGregor, M.S.M. (1968) Some aspects of oral contraceptives and married women. Med. offr. (In press).Google Scholar
Thompson, B. & Finlayson, A. (1963) Married women who work in early motherhood. Br. J. Social. 14, 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar