Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T19:15:40.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Illegitimacy in Aberdeen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Rachel Filinson
Rachel Filinson
Affiliation:
MRC Institute of Medical Sociology, Westburn Road, Aberdeen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Since the 1960s, illegitimacy rates in Britain have increased and it is likely that the rise is related to a changing meaning of illegitimacy. Three cohorts of women bearing illegitimate babies in Aberdeen are studied in order to explore the social context of illegitimacy over the period of rising illegitimacy rates. One cohort of women bore their babies in 1954, a second cohort in 1964 and the third cohort in 1974. By using three sources of official data in conjunction—birth registrations, marriage registrations and hospital records—an effort is made to construct the careers of these women and thereby to obtain some insight into the circumstances in which illegitimacy occurs. It is found that there is a continuing pattern of women who bear illegitimate babies being young, single and primiparous, that the rates of marriage and timing of marriage after delivery of an illegitimate child for all three cohorts are similar and that there is no evidence of an increased incidence of cohabitation. More and better types of data on illegitimacy are needed to supplement the existing stock of official data.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 1982 , pp. 141 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © 1982, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashdown-Sharp, P. (1975) The Single Woman's Guide to Pregnancy and Parenthood, Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middlesex.Google Scholar
Berkov, B. & Sklar, J. (1975) Methodological options in measuring illegitimacy and the difference they make. Soc. Biol. 22, 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkov, B. & Sklar, J. (1976) Reply to Ventura's comments on methodological options in measuring illegitimacy and the difference they make. Soc. Biol. 23, 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, M. (1979) Birth Intervals and Family Building Patterns. Population Trends No. 18, pp. 8–16. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. (1980) Why don't sociologists make more use of official statistics? Sociology, 14, 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, I. (1977) Illegitimate births and illegitimate inferences. Scottish J. Sociol. 1, 125.Google ScholarPubMed
Crellin, E., Kellmer Pringle, M.L. & West, P. (1971) Born Illegitimate: Social and Educational Implications. National Foundation for Education Research in England and Wales, London.Google Scholar
Cutright, P. (1976) Why illegitimacy? Fam. Plann. Perspect. 8, 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunnell, K. (1979) Family Formation 1976. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Fairchilds, C. (1978) Female sexual attitudes and the rise of illegitimacy: a case study. J. Interdisciplinary Hist. 8, 627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer Report (1974) Report of the Committee on One-Parent Families. Cmnd 5629, HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Gill, D. (1977) Illegitimacy, Sexuality, and the Status of Women. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hartley, S.F. (1965) The amazing rise of illegitimacy in Great Britain. Soc. Forces, 44, 333.Google Scholar
Illsley, R. (1980) Professional or Public Health. Rock Carling Fellowship, London.Google Scholar
Illsley, R. & Gill, D. (1968) Changing trends in illegitimacy. Soc. Sci. Med. 2, 414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiernan, K. (1980) Patterns of Family Formation and Dissolution. Office of Population Census and Surveys, London.Google Scholar
Leete, R. (1976) Marriage and Divorce. Population Trends No. 3, pp. 3–8. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Leete, R. (1978) Adoption Trends and Illegitimate Births. Population Trends No. 14, pp. 9–16, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1978) Birth Statistics England and Wales. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Registrar General for Scotland (1951-55, 1961–65) Annual Report. HM Stationery Office, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Registrar General for Scotland (1971-77, 1978) Annual Report Part 2, Population and Vital Statistics. HM Stationery Office, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Shorter, E. (1975) The Making of the Modern Family. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Smout, T.C. (1976) Aspects of sexual behaviour in 19th century Scotland. In: Social Class in Scotland: Past and Present. Edited by MacLaren., A. A.Donald, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Smout, T.C. (1977) Illegitimacy: a reply. Scottish J. Sociol. 2, 97.Google Scholar
Teele, J.E. & Schmidt, W.M. (1970) Illegitimacy and race. Milbank memlFundQ. Bull. 48, 127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, B. (1956) Social study of illegitimate maternities. Br.J.prev. soc. Med. 10, 75.Google ScholarPubMed
Tietze, C. & Dawson, D.A. (1973) Induced Abortion—A Fact Book. Reports on Population/Family Planning 14. The Population Council, New York.Google Scholar
Tilly, L.A., Scott, J.W. & Cohen, M. (1976) Women's work and European fertility patterns. J. Interdisciplinary Hist. 6, 447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trost, J. (1977) Sweden. In: Divorce in Europe. Edited by Chester, R.. Martinus-Nijhoff, Leiden.Google Scholar
Ventura, S.J. (1976) Comment on methodological options in measuring illegitimacy and the difference they make. Soc. Biol. 23, 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar