Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T16:30:27.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social class and mobility in male adoptees and non-adoptees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

T. W. Teasdale  and
David R. Owen
T. W. Teasdale
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Kommunehospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, and Department of Psychology, University of Lund, Sweden
David R. Owen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Four hundred and fourteen adoptees were located in a population of 28,879 males born within a 4-year period. For all of these males, two social class ratings were obtained, based upon their occupations at age 25–28 and 35–38. A single rating was obtained for their fathers, based upon occupation at the time of birth of the population males. In the case of adoptees, this rating was obtained for both the biological and the adoptive fathers. The adoptees had, at both ages, an average social class not deviating from that of the population at large. Their biological fathers were, however, below average paternal social class and their adoptive fathers were above it. Positive correlations for social class were found between the adoptees, at both ages, and their biological and adoptive fathers. The social class of adoptees is less well predicted by that of their biological and adoptive fathers, even when these are taken jointly, than the social class of sons in the population is predicted by that of their fathers. Evidence from both the group means and the correlations suggests that the adoptees at age 35–38 came to resemble their biological fathers in social class more than they had done at age 25–28.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 1984 , pp. 521 - 530
Copyright
Copyright © 1984, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bouchard, T.J. & McGue, M. (1981) Familial studies of intelligence: a review. Science, N.Y. 212, 1055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeFries, J.C. & Plomin, R. (1978) Behavioral genetics. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 29, 473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friis-Hasché, E. & Michelsen, N. (1979) Anvendelse af CPR's stillingsbetegnelse til socialgruppeinddeling i socialmedicinske undersøgelser (with English abstract). Ugeskr. Laeg. 141, 535.Google Scholar
Ho, H., Plomin, R. & DeFries, J.C. (1979) Selective placement in adoption. Social Biol. 26, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jencks, C. (1972) Inequality. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Kety, S.S., Rosenthal, D., Wender, P.H. & Schulsinger, F. (1968) The types and prevalence of mental illness in the biological and adoptive families of adopted schizophrenics. Am. J. Psychiat. 128, 302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loehlin, J.C. (1980) Recent adoption studies of IQ. Hum. Genet. 55, 297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munsinger, H. (1975) Children's resemblance to their biological and adopting parents in two ethnic groups. Behav. Genet. 5, 239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philip, J., Lundsteen, C., Owen, D. & Hirschhorn, K. (1976) The frequency of chromosomal aberrations in tall men with special regard to 47, XYY and 47, XXY. Am. J. hum. Genet. 28, 401.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., DeFries, J.C. & Roberts, M.K. (1977) Assortative mating by unwed biological parents of adopted children. Science, N.Y. 196, 449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scarr, S., Scarf, E. & Weinberg, R.A. (1980) Perceived and actual similarities in biological and adoptive families: does perceived similarity bias genetic inferences? Behav. Genet. 10, 445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scarr, S. & Weinberg, R.A. (1979) Nature and nurture strike (out) again. Intelligence, 3, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiff, M., Duyme, M., Dumaret, A., Stewart, J., Tomkiewicz, S. & Feingold, J. (1978) Intellectual status of working-class children adopted early into upper-middle-class families. Science, N.Y. 200, 1503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steiger, J.H. (1980) Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychol. Bull. 87, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svalastoga, K. (1959) Prestige, Class, and Mobility. Gyldendal, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Teasdale, T.W. (1979) Social class correlations among adoptees and their biological and adoptive parents. Behav. Genet. 9, 103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teasdale, T.W. & Owen, D.R. (1981) Social class correlations among separately adopted siblings and unrelated individuals adopted together. Behav. Genet. 11, 577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teasdale, T.W. & Sørensen, T.I.A. (1983) Educational attainment and social class in adoptees: genetic and environmental contributions. J. biosoc. Sci. 15, 509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, E.J. (1959) The comparison of regression variables. J. Roy. statist. Soc. Ser. B, 21, 396.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A., Mednick, S.A., Schulsinger, F., Bakkestrøm, E., Christiansen, K.O., Goodenough, D.R., Hirschhorn, K., Lundsteen, C., Owen, D.R., Philip, J., Rubin, D.B. & Stocking, M. (1976) Criminality in XYY and XXY men. Science, N.Y. 193, 547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed