Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:51:33.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changing Perceptions of the New Administrative Class in Anglo-Norman and Angevin England: The Curiales and Their Conservative Critics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

Ralph V. Turner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A complaint among twelfth-century English moralists and chroniclers was that monarchs were choosing “men raised from the dust” to be their ministers and counselors instead of members of old noble families. They charged that the king was choosing as his courtiers or familiares low-born men—plebes, ignobiles, even rustici or servi—allowing them to usurp places that belonged to the aristocracy. This chorus of complaint began in the time of William the Conqueror's sons. Only then did nobiles and curiales begin to divide into two distinct groups, and new administrative posts provided opportunities for new men to rise to greater wealth and influence.

The early twelfth-century monastic chronicler, Orderic Vitalis, wrote that William the Conqueror “raised up the lowest of his Norman followers to the greatest riches.” Often cited is his complaint about Henry I, “So he pulled down many great men [illustres] from positions of eminence …. He ennobled others of base stock [de ignobili stirpe] who had served him well, raised them, so to say, from the dust, and heaping all kinds of favors on them, stationed them above earls and famous castellans.” The author of the Gesta Stephani also complained that Henry I took men of low birth [ex plebeio genere], who had entered his service as court pages and enriched them, endowed them with wide estates, and made them his chief officials. Another chronicler, Richard of Hexham, made a similar comment, although in admiring rather than condemning language, “He oppressed many nobles because of their faithlessness; he elevated to high honors many commoners [ignobiles], whom he found to be upright and loyal to him.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 93 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Vitalis, Orderic, Historia ecclesiastica, 6 vols., ed. and trans. Chibnall, Marjorie (Oxford, 1968–1980), 2:261Google Scholar; similarly, of William Rufus, 5:202–3.

2 Orderic, 6:16.

3 Gesta Stephani, ed. Potter, K. R., Medieval Texts (Edinburgh, 1955), p. 22Google Scholar.

4 Chronicles of the reigns of Stephen, Henry II, and Richard I, ed. Howlett, Richard, Rolls Series (London, 1886), 3:140Google Scholar.

5 Chronicles of Ralph Niger, ed. Anstruther, Robert, Caxton Society, 13 (London, 1851), p. 167Google Scholar: “servos spurios, caligatos cubiculi mensae.”

6 De nugis curialium, ed. and trans. James, M. R., rev. Brooke, C. N. L. and Mynors, R. A. B. (Oxford, 1983), bk. 1, chap. 10, pp. 12–15Google Scholar.

7 Patrologia Latina, vol. 207, col. 300, epistle 95.

8 Gerald of Wales, Topographia Hibernica, ed. Dimock, J. F., in Opera, Rolls Series (London, 1867), 5:199Google Scholar.

9 Jaeger, C. Stephen, The Origins of Courtliness (Philadelphia, 1985), p. 55Google Scholar.

10 Noble, Peter S., “Knights and Burgesses in the Feudal Epic,” in The Ideals and Practice of Medieval Knighthood, ed. Harper-Bill, Christopher and Harvey, Ruth (Woodbridge, 1986), p. 110Google Scholar; Duby, Georges, Les trois ordres ou l'imaginaire du féodalism (Paris, 1978)Google Scholar; citations are from the English translation, The Three Orders (Chicago, 1980), p. 279Google Scholar.

11 Duby, Georges, “Situation de la noblesse en France au début du XIIIe siècle,” Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis 82 (1969): 309–15Google Scholar, translated in The Chivalrous Society, trans. Postan, Cynthia (London, 1977), p. 182Google Scholar. The romance L'escoufle depicts an early Norman count aiding the German emperor in ridding himself of serfs to whom he had handed over control of castles and cities and restoring the proper order of things (ed. H. Michelant and Paul Meyer, Soctétê des anciens textes français [Paris, 1894], pp. 45–49).

12 Chroniques des ducs de Normandie, ed. Fahlin, Carin, Bibliotheca Ekmaniana Universitatis regalis Upsaliensis, nos. 56, 60 (Uppsala, 1951–1954), 2:196–97Google Scholar, line 28,824; Duby, , “Situation,” p. 182Google Scholar.

13 Duby, Three Orders.

14 Southern, R. W., “The Place of Henry I in English History,” in Medieval Humanism and Other Essays (New York, 1970), pp. 208–28Google Scholar.

15 Green, Judith A., “The King's Servants,” chap. 7 in The Government of England under Henry I (Cambridge, 1986), pp. 134–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and tables 4–5, pp. 284–86.

16 Newman, Charlotte A., The Anglo-Norman Mobility in the Reign of Henry I: The Second Generation (Philadelphia, 1988), app. A, pp. 183, 189Google Scholar.

17 Ibid., pp. 138–40, 176.

18 Mason, Emma, “Magnates, curiales and the Wheel of Fortune,” Anglo-Norman Studies (formerly Proceedings of the Battle Conference) 2 (1979): 131–40Google Scholar.

19 Young, Charles R., Hubert Walter (Durham, N.C., 1967), p. 165Google Scholar.

20 Robert de Beaumont, earl of Leicester; William de Mandeville, earl of Essex; and Hugh de Puiset, bishop of Durham, are the three aristocrats. Backgrounds of clerics Roger of Salisbury and William Longchamp are obscure; see nn. 73 and 79 below.

21 Turner, Ralph V., The English Judiciary in the Age of Glanvill and Bracton (Cambridge, 1985), p. 293Google Scholar.

22 Henry of London, a Blund, and Master Ralph of Norwich.

23 James of Potterne, see Turner, p. 142; Walter of Creeping, ibid., p. 144. Most of the nine clerics can be linked indirectly to knightly families, so that they were at least poor relations, unlikely to have been servile in status.

24 For example, Orderic Vitalis (n. 1 above), pagenses milites, 6:26–27; gregarii equites, 3:108–9. Florence of Worcester, Chronicon ex chronicis, ed. Thorpe, Benjamin, English Historical Society (London, 1848–1849), 1:49Google Scholar, uses milites gregarii. Wace, , Le roman du rou, ed. Holder, A. S., Société des anciens textes français (Paris, 1970–1973), 2:123Google Scholar, lines 6,417–22, speaks of barons, chevaliers, vavasors, and soldeiers.

25 Strayer, Joseph R., “The Two Levels of Feudalism” in Life and Thought in the Early Middle Ages, ed. Hoyt, Robert S. (Minneapolis, 1967), pp. 51–65Google Scholar; also Duby, Georges, “Une enquête à poursuivre: La noblèsse dans la France médiévale,” Revue Historique 226 (1961): 1–22Google Scholar. For a survey of the literature, see Bumke, Joachim, “On the State of Research into Knighthood,” chap. 7 in The Concept of Knighthood in the Middle Ages (New York, 1970)Google Scholar, translation of Studien zum Ritterbegriff im 12. und 13. Jahrhundert. For a more recent French research, see Martindale, Jane, “The French Aristocracy in the Early Middle Ages: A Reappraisal,” Past and Present, no. 75 (1977), pp. 5–45Google Scholar; and Bouchard, Constance B., “The Origins of the French Nobility: A Reassessment,” American Historical Review 86 (1981): 501–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For German research, see Freed, John B., “Reflections on the Medieval German Nobility,” American Historical Review 91 (1988): 535–75Google Scholar.

26 Bates, David, Normandy before 1066 (London, 1982), p. 52Google Scholar.

27 Walter of Coventry, Memoriale, ed. Stubbs, William, Rolls Series (London, 1872–1873), 2:220Google Scholar.

28 Coss, P. R., “Literature and Social Terminology: The Vavasour in England,” in Social Relations and Ideas: Essays in Honour of R. H. Hilton, ed. Ashton, T. H., Coss, P. R., Dyer, Christopher, and Thirsk, Joan (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 109–50Google Scholar.

29 Stenton, F. M., The First Century of English Feudalism, 1066–1166 (Oxford, 1932), p. 16Google Scholar.

30 Harvey, Sally, “The Knight and the Knight's Fee in England,” Past and Present, no. 49 (November 1970), pp. 31–34, 42Google Scholar.

31 Koehler, Erich, “Observations historiques et sociologiques sur la poèsie des troubadours,” Cahiers de civilisation médiévale 7 (1964): 31–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar. CompareLoeb, Ariane, “La définition et l'affirmation du groupe noble comme enjeu de la poèsie courtoise? Quelques analyses des textes du troubadour Peire Vidal,” Cahiers de civilisation médiévale 30 (1987): 303–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar. She attacks Köhler's article as “largement tributaire d'une vue simplificatrice des théories marxistes.” She argues that troubadour poetry was part of a process by which great nobles sought to preserve their privileged position and to impose their values on their knights, the reverse of a process by which the aristocracy accepted knightly values. Flori, Jean, “Chevalerie, noblesse et luttes de classes au Moyen Age: À propos d'un ouvrage récent,” Le Moyen Age 94 (1988): 263–66Google Scholar, maintains that the nobiles did not copy the milites in formulating the chivalric code, but rather the reverse.

32 Duby, Georges, “Les origines de la chivalerie,” in Ordinamenti militari in occidente nell'alto medioevo, settimane di studio del centra italiano di studi sull'alto medioevo 15, 2 vols. (Spoleto, 1968), 2:759–60Google Scholar; translated as “The Origins of Knighthood” in Chivalrous Society (n. 11 above), pp. 165–67Google Scholar. Also, Painter, Sidney, “Religious Chivalry,” chap. 3 in French Chivalry, Chivalric Ideas and Practices in Medieval France (Baltimore, 1940), pp. 65–94Google Scholar; and Morris, Colin, “Equestris ordo: Chivalry as a Vocation in the Twelfth Century,” in Religious Movilation: Biographical and Sociological Problems for the Church Historian, ed. Baker, Derek, Studies in Church History (Oxford, 1978), 15:87–96Google Scholar.

33 Policraticus, 2 vols., ed. Webb, C. C. J. (Oxford, 1909), 2:8–58Google Scholar; chap. 6; Painter, pp. 65–94.

34 Le livre des manières, ed. Kremer, J. (Marburg, 1887), p. 129, lines 585–90Google Scholar.

35 Duby, , Three Orders, p. 285Google Scholar; Painter, pp. 7–73.

36 Freed (n. 25 above).

37 Holt, J. C., “Feudal Society and the Family in Early Medieval England: Part 1, The Revolution of 1066,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th ser., 32 (1982): 206CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Holt, pp. 206–7; Mason (n. 18 above), pp. 122–23, 130.

39 Bates (n. 26 above), pp. 104–11, 132.

40 Harvey (n. 30 above).

41 The phrase is from de Poitiers, Guillaume, Histoire de Guillaume le Conquérant, ed. Foreville, Raymonde (Paris, 1952), p. 232Google Scholar. Guillaume in the same passage mentions gregarii.

42 Harvey, pp. 20–21. Barlow, Frank, William Rufus (Berkeley, Calif., 1984), p. 163Google Scholar, notes that in most eleventh-century literary texts, milites seem to be “little more than common soldiers.” R. Allan Brown vigorously disputes Harvey's view: “But it is certain that by the mid-eleventh century Norman knights at least … were a military elite, and therefore a social elite.” See Brown, , “The Status of the Norman Knight,” in War and Government in the Middle Ages, ed. Gillingham, John and Holt, J. C. (Cambridge, 1984), p. 30Google Scholar.

43 Chibnall, Marjorie, Anglo-Norman England, 1066–1166 (Oxford, 1986), pp. 15–16, 32Google Scholar.

44 Chibnall, Marjorie, “Mercenaries and the Familia regis under Henry I,” History 62 (1977): 17–18, 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Ibid., pp. 18–20.

46 Harvey, p. 31; Chibnall, , Anglo-Norman England, p. 220Google Scholar.

47 Dialogus de Scaccario, ed. Johnson, Charles, Medieval Texts (Oxford, 1950), p. 117Google Scholar.

48 Ibid., p. 111.

49 Denholm-Young, Noël, “Feudal Society in the Thirteenth Century: The Knights,” Collected Papers on Medieval Subjects, new ed. (Cardiff, 1969), pp. 83–88Google Scholar.

50 A recent estimate, found in Quick, J., “The Number and Distribution of Knights in Thirteenth Century England: The Evidence of the Grand Assize Lists,” in Thirteenth Century England, Proceedings of the Newcastle upon Tyne Conference, 1985, ed. Coss, P. R. and Lloyd, S. D. (Woodbridge, 1986), p. 119Google Scholar. An older one is found in Treharne, R. F., “The Knights in the Period of Reform and Rebellion, 1258–67: A Critical Phase in the Rise of a New Class,” Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 21 (1946–1948): 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Glanvill, ed. Hall, G. D. G., Medieval Texts (Oxford, 1965), bk. 7, chap. 3, p. 75Google Scholar; bk. 7, chap. 9, p. 82.

52 Ibid., bk. 2, chaps. 10–11, p. 30; bk. 9, chap. 7, p. 111, grand assize; bk. 1, chap. 19, p. 11, viewers of essoiners; Bracton, ed. Woodbine, G. E., trans. Thorne, S. E. (New Haven, Conn., 1968–1970), 4:57Google Scholar, fol. 331b, grand assize: “quatuor legales milites … ad eligendum … duodecim de legalioribus militibus”; viewers of essoiners, 4:113, fol. 353. Quick, pp. 115–16.

53 Curia Regis Rolls, Public Record Office (PRO) (London, 1923–), 3:211Google Scholar, Michaelmas 1204. See also 3:201–2, and 1:203: “duo pauperes, non milites venerunt.”

54 Curia Regis Rolls, 9:157Google Scholar, Trinity 1220.

55 For example, Curia Regis Rolls, 3:129, 224Google Scholar.

56 For example, Curia Regis Rolls, 1:287Google Scholar, milites et probos homines; 6:28, jury discharged and knights ordered summoned to replace them; 9:232, Henry III in 1220.

57 Powicke, F. M., The Thirteenth Century, Oxford History of England, 15 vols. (Oxford, 1953), 4:547Google Scholar; Poole, A. L., The Obligations of Society in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries (Oxford, 1946), p. 4Google Scholar.

58 Treharne, pp. 3–4.

59 Bracton, fol. 5b, 2:32–33Google Scholar.

60 Documents of the Baronial Movement of reform and Rebellion, 1258–1267, ed. Treharne, R. F. and Sanders, I. J. (Oxford, 1973), pp. 108–9Google Scholar; English Historical Documents, vol. 3, 1189–1327, ed. Rothwell, Harry (London, 1975), p. 365Google Scholar.

61 Coss (n. 28 above).

62 Newman (n. 16 above), p. 127.

63 Stubbs, William, ed., Select Charters and Other Illustrations of English Constitutional History, 9th ed. rev. (Oxford, 1913), p. 294Google Scholar.

64 Mason (n. 18 above), p. 130.

65 Türk, Egbert, Nugae curialium: Le régne d'Henri II Plantagaenet (1145–1189) et l'éthique politique (Geneva, 1977), p. 184Google Scholar.

66 Orderic Vitalis (n. 1 above), 2:269.

67 Chronicles of Ralph Niger (n. 5 above), pp. 168–69.

68 Jaeger (n. 9 above), p. 195.

69 Walker, David, “Crown and Episcopacy under the Normans and Angevins,” Anglo-Norman Studies 5 (1982): 220Google Scholar, 54 percent down to 1216.

70 Orderic Vitalis, 4:170–73.

71 Gransden, Antonia, Historical Writing in Medieval England, 550–1307 (Ithaca, N.Y., 1974), pp. 156–57Google Scholar.

72 Orderic Vitalis, 4:170–73.

73 William of Newburgh, Historia rerum anglicarum, ed. Hamilton, H. C., English Historical Society, 2 vols. (London, 1856), 1:35–36Google Scholar; Dialogus de Scaccario (n. 47 above), p. 42.

74 Türk, p. 188; Jaeger, p. 66.

75 Boivin-Champaux, Louis, Notice sur Guillaume de Longchamp, évêque d'Ely, vice-roi d'Angleterre (Evreux, 1885), pp. 6–9Google Scholar; Roger of Howden, Chronia, ed. Stubbs, William, Rolls Series (London, 1868–1871), 3:142Google Scholar; translation from English Historical Documents, vol. 2, 1042–1189, ed. Douglas, David C. and Greenaway, George W. (London, 1968), p. 70Google Scholar; Stubbs, William, Historical Introductions to the Rolls Series (London, 1902), pp. 214–15Google Scholar.

76 Roger of Howden, 3:150, with translation from English Historical Documents, vol. 3 (n. 60 above), pp. 75–77; also Patrilogiae cursus completus: Putres … latinae, ed. Migne, Jacques Paul (Paris, 1844–1855), vol. 207, col. 281Google Scholar.

77 Roger of Howden, 3:72. This passage from Claudian is also quoted by Map, Walter, in De nugis curialium (n. 6 above), bk. 1, chap. 10, pp. 14–15Google Scholar. For a translation, see English Historical Documents, 2:65Google Scholar.

78 Gerald of Wales, De vita Galfridi, ed. Dimock, J. F., in Opera, Rolls Series (London, 1873), 4:418Google Scholar.

79 Stubbs, p. 214; Poole, A. L., From Domesday Book to Magna Carta, 2d ed. (Oxford, 1955), p. 352Google Scholar.

80 Gerald of Wales, De vita Galfridi, in Opera, 4:408Google Scholar, Vita Sancti Remigii, in Opera, 7:38Google Scholar. On Walter's career, see Poggioli, Peter A., “From Politician to Prelate: The Career of Walter of Coutances, Archbishop of Rouen, 1184–1207” (Ph.D. diss., Johns Hopkins University, 1984)Google Scholar.

81 West, Francis, The Justiciarship in England, 1066–1232 (Cambridge, 1966), pp. 37–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Warren, W. L., Henry II (Berkeley, Calif., 1973)Google Scholar, describes Richard de Lucy's background as “the fairly well-to-do knightly class” (p. 261).

82 Histoire des ducs Normandie et rois d'Angleterre, ed. Michel, Francisque, Société de l'histoire de France (Paris, 1840), p. 115Google Scholar.

83 Weiss, Michael, “The Castellan: The Early Career of Hubert de Burgh,” Viator 5 (1974): 235CrossRefGoogle Scholar, n. 1.

84 Burgess, Glyn S., “Social Status in the Lais of Marie de France,” in The Spirit of the Court, Selected Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of the International Courtly Literature Society, ed. Burgess, Glyn S. and Taylor, Robert A. (Woodbridge, 1983), p. 69Google Scholar; Foulon, C., “Les tendances aristocratiques dans le roman de Guillaume d'Angleterre,” Romania 71 (1950): 231CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

85 Sally North, “The Ideal Knight as Presented in Some French Narrative Poems, c. 1090–1240: An Outline Sketch,” in The Ideals and Practice of Medieval Knighthood: Papers from the First and Second Strawberry Hill Conferences, ed. Harper-Bill, Christopher and Harvey, Ruth (Woodbridge, 1986), pp. 125–26Google Scholar; Burgess, pp. 71–72.

86 Duby, , Three Orders (n. 10 above), pp. 278–79Google Scholar.

87 For example, the personnel of the Parlements, about 90 percent of whom had already belonged to the nobility before they bought their offices; see van Caenegem, R. C., Judges, Legislators and Professors: Chapters in European Legal History (Cambridge, 1988), p. 184Google Scholar, n. 15.

88 Duby, Georges, Guillaume le Maréchal (Paris, 1984)Google Scholar, trans. Howard, Richard as William Marshal: The Flower of Chivalry (New York, 1986)Google Scholar.

89 Green (n. 15 above), p. 144.

90 Clanchy, Michael T., “Moderni in Education and Government in England,” Speculum 50 (1975): 681CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

91 Mason (n. 18 above), p. 129.

92 Clanchy, Michael T., From Memory to Written Record, England, 1066–1307 (Cambridge, Mass., 1979)Google Scholar.

93 Murray, Alexander, Reason and Society in the Middle Ages (Oxford, 1978), pp. 195–96Google Scholar.

94 Jaeger (n. 9 above), passim, esp. pp. 39, 43, 58, 96, 101, 152–53, 173–74, 195–97, 201–7, 222.

95 Clanchy, , “Moderni in Education and Government,” p. 679Google Scholar.

96 Baldwin, John W., “Studium et Regnum: The Penetration of University Personnel into French and English Administration at the Turn of the Twelfth and Thirteen Centuries,” Revue des études islamiques 44 (1976): 199–211Google Scholar.

97 Turner, Ralph V., Men Raised from the Dust: Administrative Service and Upward Mobility in Angevin England (Philadelphia, 1988)Google Scholar.

98 Duby, Georges, “Dans la France du nord-ouest au XIIe siècle: Les jeunes dans la société aristocratique,” Annales, vol. 19 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, translated in Chivalrous Society (n. 11 above) as “Youth in Aristocratic Society,” pp. 112–22Google Scholar.

99 Coss, P. R., “Sir Geoffrey de Langley and the Crisis of the Knightly Class in Thirteenth-Century England,” Past and Present, no. 68 (August 1975), pp. 22–28Google Scholar.

100 Powicke, F. M., Cambridge Medieval History, 8 vols. (Cambridge 1924–1936), 6:219Google Scholar, actually referring to nobles, although his words seem more applicable to knights.

101 Newman (n. 16 above), pp. 18, 46, 98.

102 Walter of Coventry (n. 27 above), 2:253; Gransden (n. 71 above), pp. 334, 344.

103 Orr, John, Les oeuvres de Guiot de Provins, poète lyrique et satirique (Manchester, 1915), p. 18Google Scholar, lines 168–76. Orr dates it 1204–9, perhaps 1206 (p. xx).

104 Holt, J. C., “King John,” in Magna Carta and Medieval Government (London, 1985), pp. 106–8Google Scholar.

105 Chronica Majora, ed. Luard, H. R., Rolls Series (London, 1872–1884), 3:388Google Scholar. The king permits “now Poitevins, now Germans, now Provencals, now Romans” to get rich off England. Also Chronica monasterii S. Albani, gesta Abbatum, ed. Riley, H. T., Rolls Series (London, 1867–1869), 1:306–7Google Scholar, on Adam fitz William. See also his obituary of the sheriff of Northumberland, “a hammer of the poor, and a persecutor of the religious orders, William Heron, a most avaricious man” (Chronica Majora, 5:663Google Scholar). Matthew Paris condemned Master Ralph of Norwich's election as archbishop of Dublin because he was “a man wholly secular, and … occupied with custody of the Irish treasury by the king's patronage”; he said nothing of his probable bourgeois background (Chronica Majora, 5:560Google Scholar).

106 For example, Robert Carpenter. See Denholm-Young, Noël, “Robert Carpenter and the Provisions of Westminster” (n. 49 above), pp. 96–110Google Scholar; Meekings, C. A. F., “More about Robert Carpenter of Hareslade,” Studies in 13th-Cenlury Administration (London, 1981)Google Scholar. See also Poole, A. L., Obligations of Society (n. 57 above), pp. 53, 56Google Scholar.

107 Rosenthal, Joel, review of Turner, , The English Judiciary in the Age of Glanvill and Bracton, in Medieval Prosopography 7 (1986): 100Google Scholar.

108 Foulon (n. 84 above), p. 233.