Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T12:25:39.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Powerful Sympathy: Terror, the Prison, and Humanitarian Reform in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

Randall McGowen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is felt that men are henceforth to be held together by new ties, and separated by new barriere; for the ancient bonds will now no longer unite, nor the ancient boundaries confine. [J. S. Mill, “The Spirit of the Age” (1831)]

I

“The punishment of death shocks every mind to which it is vividly presented,” wrote Edward Gibbon Wakefield in 1832. It “overturns the most settled notions of right and wrong.” H. G. Bennet announced in Parliament in 1820 that he thought an execution “weakened the moral taste or sensibility of the people.” Such high-minded but platitudinous phrases frequently recurred in the early nineteenth-century debate over the criminal law, though historians have had a difficult time knowing what to make of them. Yet for all their vagueness such expressions do reveal a sensibility whose outline we can trace and whose influence we can measure. In drawing a connection between feeling and morality Wakefield appealed to social assumptions and values that were popular among humanitarians. Criminal law reformers proposed a new and exacting standard for the administration of justice: “Punishment,” argued James Scarlett, “ought to be consonant to the feelings and sympathies of mankind; and … those feelings ought to be enlisted on the side of the administration of justice.” They argued that the heavy reliance on the death penalty was a mistaken policy. The gallows aroused dangerous passions that signaled the existence of intractable social antagonism. They opposed such a spectacle with reforms that aimed at the promotion of a social union founded on shared feeling.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , July 1986 , pp. 312 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wakefield, Edward Gibbon, Facts Relating to the Punishment of Death (London, 1832), p. 103Google Scholar.

2 Parliamentary Dehates (PD), 1820, n.s., vol. 1, col. 236Google Scholar.

3 PD, 1823, n.s., vol. 9, cols. 430–31.

4 PD, 1830, n.s., vol. 24, col. 1033.

5 Parliamentary History, 1788–89, vol. 27, cols. 392–93.

6 PD, 1821, n.s., vol. 5, col. 906.

7 Montagu, Basil, Thoughts upon the Abolition of the Punishment of Death in Cases of Bankruptcy (London, 1821), pp. 6–8Google Scholar.

8 For an introduction to the philosophical and literary background to the idea of sympathy in the eighteenth century, see Fiering, Norman, “Irresistible Compassion: An Aspect of Eighteenth-Century Sympathy and Humanitarianism,” Journal of the History of Ideas 37 (1976): 195–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Engell, James, The Creative Imagination (Cambridge, Mass., 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 On the Effects of Capital Punishment as Applied to Forgery and Theft (London, 1818), p. 17Google Scholar. This publication was a tract issued by the Society for the Diffusion of Knowledge upon the Punishment of Death and the Improvement of Prison Discipline.

10 PD, 1830, n.s., vol. 25, col. 56.

11 PD, 1814, vol. 28, app., col. 104.

12 PD, 1810, vol. 17, col. 197.

13 PD, 1814, vol. 28, app., col. 159.

14 “Report from the Select Committee on Criminal Laws,” Quarterly Review 24 (1820–1821): 211Google Scholar.

15 PD, 1811, vol. 19, cols. 655–56.

16 PD, 1831, 3d ser., vol. 6, col. 1177.

17 PD, 1821, n.s., vol. 5, col. 953.

18 PD, 1832, 3d ser., vol. 14, col. 977.

19 PD, 1830, n.s., vol. 25, cols. 65–66.

20 Dodd, Charles Edward, “Facts Relating to the Punishment of Death,” Quarterly Review 47 (1832): 197Google Scholar.

21 PD, 1811, vol. 19, col. 641.

22 PD, 1811, vol. 19, col. 647.

23 PD, 1811, vol. 19, col. 647. Appropriately enough, it was the Evangelical William Wilberforce who rose to answer Frankland's charge. While Frankland defended the “manliness” of British law, Wilberforce spoke in praise of the mildness of British civilization. He offered an ironical conclusion to Frankland's question: “If the severity of our laws is a test of the liberty of the subject: if freedom is to decline and fall as humanity and kind feeling advance, then are we, indeed, in a progressive state to slavery” (PD, 1811, vol. 19, app., col. 76).

24 PD, 1819, vol. 39, col. 821.

25 PD, 1813–14, vol. 28, col. 182.

26 Memoirs of Joseph John Gurney, ed. Braithwaite, Joseph (Philadelphia, 1849), 1:121–22Google Scholar.

27 PD, 1819, vol. 39, cols. 905–6.

28 PD, 1819, vol. 40, col. 1519.

29 “Howard, and the Police of Prisons,” Philanthropist 2 (1812): 8Google Scholar.

30 The Works of Samuel Parr, ed. Johnston, John (London, 1828), 4:285Google Scholar.

31 Smith, William, Observations on the Laws Relative to Debtors and Felons (London, 1777), p. 6Google Scholar.

32 PD, 1819, vol. 39, col. 82.

33 “On Refinement of Character,” Monthly Repository, n.s., 6 (1832): 188Google Scholar.

34 Allen, William, Life of William Allen (Philadelphia, 1847), 1:129Google Scholar.

35 “Review of Tuke's Description of the Retreat,” Philanthropist 3 (1813): 327Google Scholar.

36 PD, 1819, vol. 39, cols. 799–800.

37 Montagu, Basil, A Brief Statement of the Proceedings In Both Houses of Parliament upon the Several Bills Introduced with a View to the Amendment of the Criminal Law (London, 1811), pp. 36–37Google Scholar.

38 Mill, James, “On the Penal Laws of England,” Philanthropist 1 (1811): 153Google Scholar.

39 “Report on the Criminal Laws,” Parliamentary Papers, 1819, 8(586):63Google Scholar.

40 “Report from the Committee of the House of Commons on the King's Bench, Fleet, and Marshalsea Prisons,” Philanthropist 5 (1815): 290Google Scholar.

41 PD, 1821, n.s., vol. 5, col. 937.

42 Hazlitt, William, “On the Punishment of Death.” Fraser s Magazine 2 (1831): 669Google Scholar.

43 “Strictures on the Right, Expedience, and Indiscriminate Denunciation of Capital Punishment,” Pamphleteer 3 (1814): 122Google Scholar.

44 “Remarks on a Late Execution at Shrewsbury,” Philanthropist 2 (1812): 207–8Google Scholar.

45 PD, 1814, vol. 28, app., cols. 137–38.

46 Mill, James, “On the Criminal Law,” Philanthropist 1 (1811): 154Google Scholar.

47 “Strictures on the Right, Expedience, and Indiscriminate Denunciation of Capital Punishment,” p. 133.

48 “Punishment,” Westminster Review 17 (1832): 54Google Scholar.

49 PD, 1822, n.s., vol. 7, col. 794.

50 Empson, William, “Rossi on Criminal Law,” Edinburgh Review 54 (1831): 238Google Scholar.

51 Montagu, , A Brief Statement …, pp. 36–37Google Scholar.

52 PD, 1824, n.s., vol. 11, col. 1084.

53 “Strictures on the Right, Expedience, and Indiscriminate Denunciation of Capital Punishment,” p. 128.

54 Allen (n. 34 above), 1:129.

55 PD, 1811, vol. 19, app., col. 76.

56 PD, 1810, vol. 17, col. 359.

57 Buxton, Thomas Fowell, An Inquiry Whether Crime and Misery Are Produced or Prevented by Our Present System of Prison Discipline (London, 1818), p. 135Google Scholar.

58 PD, 1819, vol. 39, col. 822; Memoirs of the Life of Sir Samuel Romilly (Shannon, 1971), 3:332–33Google Scholar.

59 Gurney, J. J., “Notes on a Visit Made to Some Prisons,” Pumphleteer 15 (1820): 109Google Scholar.

60 “Buxton's Inquiry into Our System of Prison Discipline,” Philanthropist 7 (1819): 216–217Google Scholar.

61 Buxton, p. 136.

62 Ibid., p. 119.

63 PD, 1819, vol. 39, col. 398.

64 “Capital Punishment,” Edinburgh Review 35 (1821): 352Google Scholar.

65 Fry, Elizabeth, Memoir of the Life of Elizaheth Fry, ed. Fry, Katherine and Cresswell, R. E. (London, 1847), 1:384Google Scholar.

66 PD, 1814, vol. 28, app., col. 186.

67 “Review of Tuke's Description of the Retreat” (n. 35 above), p. 326.

68 “Capital Punishment,” p. 345.

69 Ibid., p. 346.

70 Ibid.

71 PD, 1811, vol. 19, app., col. 69.

72 PD, 1832, 3d ser., vol. 11, col. 951.

73 PD, 1823, n.s., vol. 9, col. 403.

74 SirMackintosh, James, Memoirs of the Life of Sir James Mackintosh, ed. Mackintosh, Robert (London, 1836), 2:396Google Scholar.

75 PD, 1823, n.s., vol. 9, col. 418.

76 PD, 1830, n.s., vol. 14, col. 1033.

77 “Capital Punishment,” p. 315.

78 Mill, J. S., “Civilization,” in Mill's Essaya on Literatitre and Society, ed. Schneewind, J. B. (New York, 1965), p. 162Google Scholar.

79 Ibid., p. 163.

80 Ibid., p. 164.

81 Ibid.

82 Mill, J. S., “Bentham,” in Schneewind, , ed., p. 279.Google Scholar

83 Ibid., p. 277.

84 PD, 1823, n.s., vol. 9, col. 413.