No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Organic Biography: The Death of an Art
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 January 2014
Extract
The influential Wellek and Warren, in their Theory of Literature, view biography as the servant of a scholarly master. They concede that certain biographies have their own “intrinsic interest,” but the main bias of their work is towards the perception of biography as a quarry from which facts are to be mined and then put to other uses.
There seems to be little doubt that for the majority of biographies Wellek and Warren are correct, and their conclusions readily find support among the most serious surveys of the biographical tradition. Yet a disinterested bystander would surely observe with great curiosity how frequently in our age older and apparently outmoded factual mines are replaced by new ones. Moreover, he would surely be puzzled as he scrutinized the biographical scene more carefully and discovered in the background a number of works written between 1640 and 1851, which retain a perennial fascination and freshness and show no signs of becoming outmoded, despite numerous objections that they are unreliable and generally untrue. These works, which shall be called primary organic biographies, are defined below and include Walton's Lives, Burnet's Life of Hale and his Life of Rochester, Johnson's Life of Savage and his “Life of Thomson,” Goldsmith's Life of Nash, Boswell's Life of Johnson, and Carlyle's Life of Sterling.
Universally regarded as works of art but castigated in varying degrees for the alleged unreliability of their facts and thus for their departure from the straight and narrow path of truth, the primary organic biographies are part of a tradition that critics have consistently failed to understand.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1973
References
1. Wellek, Rene and Warren, Austin, Theory of Literature (New York, 1956), pp. 75–80Google Scholar.
2. We are aware that the starting date of 1640 may seem arbitrary, but space limitations will not allow a consideration of works of an earlier date.
3. A fuller definition will be arrived at below, but it may be important to observe for present purposes that we describe these works as primary because they are written by contemporaries of their subjects, and organic because there is in each a vital inter-relationship between biographer and subject, as well as between the thought and style in the work itself. The Life of Hooker almost becomes a special case in that Walton was only seven when Hooker died.
4. A very recent exception to what we shall suggest to be a general rule is, in terms of its aims, Passler, David L., Time, Form, And Style In Boswell's Life of Johnson (New Haven, 1971)Google Scholar.
5. Nicolson, Harold, The Development of English Biography (London, 1927), p. 8Google Scholar.
6. Garraty, John A., The Nature of Biography (New York, 1957), p. 28Google Scholar.
7. Nicolson, , Development of English Biography, p. 12Google Scholar.
8. Kendall, Paul Murray, The Art of Biography (New York, 1965), p. xiiGoogle Scholar.
9. Stauffer, Donald A., The Art of Biography in Eighteenth-Century England (Princeton, 1941), I, 4Google Scholar.
10. Stauffer, , Art of Biography, I, 396Google Scholar.
11. Tolles, Frederick B., “The Biographer's Craft,” SAQ, LIII (October 1954), 520Google Scholar.
12. Nicolson, , Development of English Biography, p. 65Google Scholar.
13. Stauffer, D. A., English Biography Before 1700 (New York, 1964), p. 115Google Scholar.
14. Ibid., p. 167 (italics added).
15. Nicolson, , Development of English Biography, p. 16Google Scholar (italics added).
15. Longaker, Mark, English Biography in the Eighteenth Century (Philadelphia, 1931), p. 408CrossRefGoogle Scholar (italics added).
17. Altick, Richard D., Lives and Letters: A History of Literary Biography in England and America (New York, 1966), p. xivGoogle Scholar.
18. Ibid., p. 21.
19. Ibid.
20. Williams, Raymond, The Long Revolution (London, 1965), pp. 90–91Google Scholar.
21. Lukacs, Georg, Studies in European Realism (New York, 1964), p. 6Google Scholar.
22. Carlyle, Thomas, Critical and Miscellaneous Essays (London, 1899), III, 90Google Scholar.
23. Edel, Leon, Literary Biography (Toronto, 1957), p. 2Google Scholar.
24. Ibid.
25. Carlyle, , Complete Works (New York, 1897), XIII, 52Google Scholar.
26. Ibid., p. 53.
27. Ibid., p. 52.
28. Ibid.
29. Ibid., p. 55.
30. Altick, , Lives and Letters, p. 22Google Scholar.
31. Walton, Izaak, Lives of Donne, Wotton, Hooker, Herbert, and Sanderson (London, 1927), p. 48Google Scholar.
32. Clifford, James L., From Puzzles To Portraits: Problems of a Literary Biographer (Chapel Hill, 1970), p. 3Google Scholar.
33. Ibid., p. 84.
34. Ibid., pp. 84-89.
35. There have been attempts at creating secondary organic works, one example of which is Lindsay's, JackJohn Bunyan: Maker of Myths (London, 1937)Google Scholar.
36. Johnson, Samuel, Lives of the English Poets, ed. Hill, G. B. (Oxford, 1905), I, 309Google Scholar.