Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T01:19:28.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comprehension of Icelandic pronoun gender: semantic versus formal factors*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Randa Mulford
Randa Mulford
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ability of Icelandic children (aged 4 to 8 years) to identify referents of gender-marked pronouns was tested under three conditions: (i) referents with natural/semantic gender, (ii) familiar referents with grammatical gender, (iii) unfamiliar referents with grammatical gender. Potential formal information about grammatical gender was held constant across all conditions. Children's correct identification of pronoun referents was most highly related to the familiarity of the referents and the availability of natural gender information, not to formal gender information. The results are discussed in light of contradictory findings from German. It is argued that subtle differences in the formal gender systems of.the two languages may underlie the different experimental results and may lead to different developmental patterns.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 443 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berger, W. (1954). Witte Kinderlexikon. Freiburg: Verlag Hans Witte.Google Scholar
Böhme, K. (1983). Children's understanding and awareness of German possessive pronouns. Unpublished dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Böhme, K. & Levelt, W. J. M. (1979). Children's use and awareness of natural and syntactic gender in possessive pronouns. Paper presented to the conference on Linguistic Awareness and Learning to Read,Victoria,British Columbia.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Levy, Y. (1980). The non-interaction of linguistic and cognitive notions of gender in the language of young children. Ms., The Hebrew University, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Levy, Y. (1983). The acquisition of Hebrew plurals: the case of the missing gender category. JChLang 10. 107–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Maratsos, M. P. & Chalkley, M. A. (1980). The internal language of children's syntax: the ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In Nelson, K. E. (ed.), Children's language, Vol. 2. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Meine Erster Brockhaus: Ein Buntes Bilder-ABC. (1963). Wiesbaden: Brockhaus.Google Scholar
Mills, A. E. (in press). The acquisition of German. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mulford, R. & Morgan, J. L. (1983 a). On learning to assign gender to new nouns in Icelandic. Paper presented at the Minnesota Regional Conference on Language and Linguistics,University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Mulford, R. & Morgan, J. L. (1983 b). The role of local cues in assigning gender to new nouns in Icelandic. Paper presented at the Eighth Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.Google Scholar
Pálsdóttir, M. (1982). Hvernig lærist kyn persónufornafna? (How is personal pronoun gender learned?) Ms., University of Iceland, Reykjavik.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1982). A theory of the acquisition of lexical-interpretive grammars. In Bresnan, J. (ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1966). The acquisition of Russian as a native language. In Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (eds), The genesis of language: a psycholinguistic approach. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Smoczyńska, M. (in press). Acquisition of Polish. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar