Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T05:42:33.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How much is one word?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Patricia M. Greenfield
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

Address for correspondence: Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024.

References

REFERENCES

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. London: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Dore, J. (1975). Holophrases, speech acts and language universals. JChLang. 2. 2139.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M., Smith, J. & Laufer, B. (1972). Communication and the beginning of language: the development of semantic structure in one-word speech and beyond. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. & Smith, J. H. (1976). The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. & Zukow, P. G. (in the press). Why do children say what they say when they say it? An experimental approach to the psychogenesis of presupposition. In Nelson, K. (ed.), Children's language. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Howe, C. J. (1977). Review of Greenfield & Smith (1976). JChLang. 4. 479–83.Google Scholar
Miller, M. (1975). Pragmatic constraints on the linguistic realization of ‘semantic intentions’ in early child language (‘telegraphic speech’). Paper presented at 3rd Internationa Child Language Symposium, London.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. London: C.U.P.Google Scholar