Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T10:18:59.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is the English present progressive unique*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

E. R. Mapstone
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Paul L. Harris
Affiliation:
University of Oxford

Abstract

The ‘problem of the error-free progressive’ (Brown 5973) was reexamined. It was hypothesized that young children make errors with the progressive as part of a developmental process. An experiment designed to elicit present-tense verbs is described, using 36 pictures, illustrating 9 process and g stative verbs. Twenty-two children (4; 2 to 6; 6) were tested: all responded mainly in the present tense, and 10 out of 22 produced over-generalizations of the progressive to stative verbs. It is argued that resistance to the progressive is based on a semantic distinction that is modified subsequently in accordance with adult use.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aitchison, J. (1983). On roots of language. Language and communication 3. 8397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . Metaphysics IX. vi. In McKeon, R. (ed.), The basic works of Aristotle. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of languge. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1970). Psycholinguistics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. London: Allen & Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D. R. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, P. (1979). The development of the verb phrase. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds), Language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. (1963). Actions, emotion and will. London: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. A. (1977). The acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. JVLVB 16. 589600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuczaj, S. A. (1978). Why do children fail to overgeneralise the progressive inflection? JChLang 5. 167–71.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. & Chalkley, M. A. (1980). The internal language of children's syntax: the nature and ontogenesis of syntactic categories. In Nelson, K. (ed.), Children's language, Vol. 2. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1972). A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar