Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T21:16:38.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scrutinizing reference: how gesture and speech are coordinated in mother-child interaction*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Chris L. Schmidt
Chris L. Schmidt*
Affiliation:
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
*
Address for correspondence: Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Kennedy Center Rm. 222, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, New York 10461, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Maternal estensive naming was investigated in a cross-sectional study of 12 children aged 0;10, 1;3 and 1;6, and a follow-up study of four children aged 1;3. Display, demonstration and pointing were coded with regard to whether and how co-occurring speech referred to gesture focus. Multivariate log-linear frequency analyses found that mothers' coordination of speech with gesture varied with age and the gesture used. Maternal naming of objects was most frequent with children aged 0; 10. Maternal gesture-speech coordination with children aged 1;3 and 1;6 differed in two related ways: (1) actions were named more frequently than objects; and (2) mothers often combined gesture with complementary speech referring, not to gesture focus, but to an action to be performed with the object indicated. At all ages, pointing was rarely used to name ostensively, and occurred most often in combination with complementary reference. Maternal input was found to be significantly correlated with children's reported receptive vocabulary.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 279 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

My thanks to the families who participated in this project, especially to ‘Lily’ and her mom. I am grateful to Wendy Reddock and Elena Levy for help in coding. Thanks are also due to Katharine Lawson, Elise Masur, Susan Rose, Holly Ruff, Thomas Wickens, my colleagues at the Kennedy Center, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments. Finally, I am grateful to David McNeill and Martin Simone for their advice and encouragement. Portions of this paper were presented at the 1995 biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. This research was supported by NICHD Grant 5T32HD0738404.

References

REFERENCES

Augustine, St (1968). Confessions. (Pine-Coffin, R. S., trans.). Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bakeman, R. & Gottman, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction: an introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, L. (1979). The emergence of symbols: cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, D. (1991). Infants' contribution to the achievement of joint reference. Child Development 62, 875–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L. (1994). The transition from infancy to language: acquiring the power of expression. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Butterworth, G. & Grover, L. (1988). The origins of referential communication in human infancy. In Weiskrantz, L. E. (ed.), Thought without language. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1988). On the logic of contrast. Journal of Child Language 15, 317–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, W. J. (1992). BMDP statistical software. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dunham, P. J., Dunham, F. & Curwin, A. (1993). Joint-attentional states and lexical acquisition at 18 months. Developmental Psychology 29, 827–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P., Pethick, S. & Reilly, J. S. (1993). MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories. San Diego: Singular Publishing.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. & Mazzie, C. (1991). Prosody and focus in speech to infants and adults. Developmental Psychology 27, 209–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A. & Morikawa, H. (1993). Common themes and cultural variations in Japanese and American mothers' speech to infants. Child Development 64, 637–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golinkoff, R. M., Mervis, C. B. & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (1994). Early object labels: the case for a developmental lexical principles framework. Journal of Child Language 21, 125–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenig, P. & Naigles, L. R. (1995). One-word speakers interpret a novel word as a predicate. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Landry, S. H. & Chapieski, M. L. (1989). Joint attention and infant toy exploration: effects of Down syndrome and prematurity. Child Development 60, 103–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lock, A., Young, A., Service, V. & Chandler, P. (1990). Some observations on the origins of the pointing gesture. In Volterra, V. & Erting, C. (eds), From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review 92, 350–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markman, E. M. (1991). The whole object, taxonomic, and mutual exclusivity assumptions as initial constraints on word meanings. In Byrnes, J. P. & Gelman, S. A. (eds), Perspectives on language and cognition: interrelations in development. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Masur, E. F. (1982). Mothers' responses to infants' object-related gestures: influences on lexical development. Journal of Child Langauge 9, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masur, E. F. (1994). Maternal labelling of novel and familiar objects: implications for lexical constraints. Poster presented at the 23rd symposium of The Jean Piaget Society, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Merriman, W. E. & Bowman, L. L. (1989). The mutual exclusivity bias in children's word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 54 (Series No. 220).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mervis, C. B. & Mervis, C. A. (1988). Role of adult input in children's category evolution. I. An observational study. Journal of Child Language 15, 257–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messer, D. J. (1978). The integration of mothers' referential speech with joint play. Child Development 49, 781–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messer, D. J. (1981). Non-linguistic information which could assist the young child's interpretation of adult speech. In Robinson, W. P. (ed.), Communication and development. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Morford, M. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1992). Comprehension and production of gesture in combination with speech in one-word speakers. Journal of Child Language 19, 559–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, K. (1988). Constraints on word learning? Cognitive Development 3, 221–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. (1971). The inscrutability of reference. In Steinberg, D. D. & Jakobovits, L. A. (eds), Semantics: an interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B., Mistry, J., Goncu, A. & Mosier, C. (1993). Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 58 (Serial No. 236).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaffer, H. R., Hepburn, A. & Collis, G. M. (1983). Verbal and nonverbal aspects of mothers' directives. Journal of Child Language 10, 337–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, C. L. (1991). The scrutability of reference. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Schmidt, C. L. (1995 a). Interpreting attention-directing gestures. In Clark, Eve V. (ed.), Proceedings of the 26th Child Language Research Forum. Chicago: CLSI.Google Scholar
Schmidt, C. L. (1995 b). Context and comprehension: individual differences in word-referent recognition at 18 months. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Cale Kruger, A. (1992). Joint attention on actions: acquiring verbs in ostensive and non-ostensive contexts. Journal of Child Language 19, 311–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. & Farrar, M. J. (1986). Joint attention and early language. Child Development 57, 1454–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turkewitz, G. & Mellon, R. C. (1989). Dynamic organization of intersensory function. Canadian Journal of Psychology 43, 286–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wickens, T. D. (1989). Multiway contingency tables analysis for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1971). Philosophical investigations. Third edition (Anscombe, G. E., trans.) New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar