Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T16:49:38.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of young children's capacity to judge anomalous sentences*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Diane B. Carr
Diane B. Carr
Affiliation:
Torphichen Education Centre, Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Judgements about the acceptability of anomalous and non-anomalous sentences were elicited from children between the ages of 2; 0 and 5; 0. Generally such judgements have been assumed to be a direct reflection of linguistic competence. Longitudinal study of individual children indicated that developmental changes in children's judgemental capacities were erratic, with sudden regressions in performance as well as sudden improvements. This was especially true of the youngest children, aged between 2; 0 and 3; 6. It appeared that, despite irregularity, certain general developmental patterns could be discerned. It is difficult to reconcile these findings with a view of sentence judgements which assumes that they directly represent linguistic competence. It is suggested that the most satisfactory explanation of the developmental data must rest on the assumption that not simply linguistic factors, but also cognitive/experiential factors are involved in sentence judgements.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1979 , pp. 227 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Donaldson, M. (1972). Preconditions of inference. In Cole, J. K. (ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, M. and McGarrigle, J. (1974). Some clues to the nature of semantic development. JChLang 1. 85–198.Google Scholar
Bonniec, G. Le (1970). Etude génétique des aspects modaux du raisonnement. In Travaux du centre d'étude des processus cognitifs et du langage, Paris.Google Scholar
Bonniec, G. Pieraut-Le (1974). Le raisonnement modal. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
James, S. L. & Miller, J. F. (1973). Children's awareness of semantic constraints in sentences. ChDev 44. 69–76.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1965). Development of the semantic system. Unpub. paper, Center for Cognitive Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1960). The language and thought of the child. London: Routledge.Google Scholar